Reply With Quote
awaiting the "Iowa is full of stupid people" tweet
Damn, Bush actually got 3%.
And then Cain with 9%.
awaiting the "Iowa is full of stupid people" tweet
Iowa means nothing. They consistently pick losers.
u complain about cuck sanders, u complain about hillary, u complain about repugsHoly if this election ends up Cruz vs Clinton
what's a preferable ballot to you?
I'd vote the corpse of Eisenhower over any of them
Saw this on HuffBlows:
Cliffs: fair chance Iowa winner gets Party nod but very few go on to win Prez.
Since 1972 only three non-in bent candidates who won Iowa have gone on to win the presidency.
Seven democrats in 10 caucuses who won in Iowa have ended up winning their party's nomination, according to the Des Moines Register. (Two were in bents who ran unopposed.)
Six Republican winners in Iowa, out of nine contests there, have gone on to win the GOP nomination. (Three were in bents who ran unopposed.)
Notables who did not win Iowa:
Ronnie Raygun
Bush Oil n War I
Billy Clinton
True.Truth is she's not that popular anywhere
Hillary always gets overrated and overhyped for no reason other than her being Bill's cuck. She's the worst type of candidate. A candidate that has zero substance, but doesn't have any superficial qualities (likeability, charisma, not having an annoying voice and annoying laugh) to make up for it.
You and me both.
shocked that Cruz pulled it off. To Trump's credit he was far more gracious than I expected.
Very underrated president imo, especially his final MIC speech.
3 man race. Trump and Cruz are gonna split the anti-establishment votes and Rubio will coalesce the establishment/moderate votes of Bush and soon to be dropouts Christie and Kaisch. Carson's votes will probably go to Cruz. Trump needs to hang on until March 15 when it'll be winner take all. Although surprisingly, Trump in NOT polling ahead in New York and California (see http://www.270towin.com/2016-republi...ination-polls/)
The thing for Rubio is, that establishment bump ain't much.
Cruz is dead. He only won in Iowa because he went full evangelical. Like Huckabee, like Santorum. That doesn't fly in other places......especially primary states....... where you don't have to be a registered republican to vote......and where people don't get their marching orders from their pastors.
I agree....it's a two man race in the GOP....Trump and Rubio......I'm starting to think Rubio is the 'establishment' man....
Seeing how Trump has been complaining about his billionaire dark money donors for 4+ months I would tend to agree with you. A lot of the oil money is going with Cruz right now though.
Lol Trump basically took a on Iowa and he still got 2nd place
Shilary basically got gangbanged by the entire state f Iowa and can't even beat a mummy
Eyup. I would venture a guess, but it is hard to figure. My gut says that people are looking for ANYBODY but Trump, until I see the "Trump" signs in neighbor's yards. Texas is a big chunk of delegates.
Nah he's a loser who thought he was going to win Iowa by just talking a big game yet blew it because he wasn't organized and detailed enough. Same reason why his businesses have filed for bankruptcy a few times. Overrated candidate got exposed for being a big talker who got support from the stupid class of his party. Heck his supporters were too lazy to vote for him or they turned on him by voting for the next GW.Lol Trump basically took a on Iowa and he still got 2nd place
Trump is not going to make this a two man race. He has to get through Cruz and that ain't happening cause he's not smart enough to outwit Teddy.
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
“No one remembers who came in second.” - Walter Hagen
2:55 PM - 30 Dec 2013
The war is not over.
He was Neocon before anyone realized Neocon was a thing.
Eisenhower's MIC warning doesn't allow me to identify him as a full fledged neocon.
Unless one person gets over 50% of votes, delegates are allocated proportionally. Trump just has to hope Cruz doesn't get 50%.
Grifter NEWS
Sarah Palin's PAC burning through cash
Alaskan spending money on self, not conservative candidates
the former Alaska governor's own political action committee, once prodigious, is flaming out: Palin's appe e for luxury travel and pricey consultants has depleted its cash reserves to historically low levels, a Center for Public Integrity review of new federal records indicate.
Sure, lots of political committees would love to have the $380,000 that remained in Sarah PAC’s coffers as of Dec. 31.
But not since mid-2009, just after Palin formed SarahPAC following her unsuccessful vice presidential bid, has the group’s cash stash dipped so low. It sat on $1 million as recently as mid-2014.
How’d this happen?
SarahPAC is simply burning through more money than it’s bringing in.
< there's a graph! >
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/01/29/19194/sarah-palins-pac-burning-through-cash?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=watchdog&utm_me dium=publici-email&goal=0_ffd1d0160d-4a3411d141-100106293&mc_cid=4a3411d141&mc_eid=3b8f64cce8
His administration's actions in El Salvador, Guatemala, Cuba and Iran allow me to. Given the times, I can't really see others doing much different, but it's when the US really got used to ing with stuff everywhere.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
