LOL...
"Mr. Benoit... what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
Oh, and did you just run dry on Spurs-related to start new attention- threads about, so now you're posting up Warriors'-related clickbait?
Bravo. Just when I thought you couldn't possibly be any more irrelevant. You're quite the little over-achiever.
You didnt watch 2003 TD, by your own admission.
I'm not the last on the list of getting at apo but it's becoming a bit ridiculous tbh... It's a thread about where curry stands in most dominant player over a season, no need to get upset about it. That's an interesting topic, curry is having so far an historic run that can be yes compared with 91 MJ 11 Lebron 03 Timmy
if they don't ring this year with curry having a sub par POs run you close the debate but as of today he is on track to put one of most dominant run ever.
I don't know why I am even responding to the guy that said Duncan never had a transcendent season but that's what happens when you do it for 20 years. Any one particular season gets lost in the mix. Yep 20 years. Drafted when I was a senior in high school, won a le when I was in college, graduate degree 1, one in graduate degree two, one during my first real job and one 2 or three jobs later. Now I am barring down the barrel of 40. So from my age of 17 to 40 he has been at this level. wrap your mind around that get back with me when curry is lighting it up in 2030. Then we can talk.
And if it were to continue for any substantial length of time we could revisit this as a GOAT discussion.
Your sample size is simply too small right now. It might help if you considered Currys career if it ended today.
He is having a great year! His playoff resume is not all that awe-inspiring. Last year he won against a beat-down Cavs team and didn't look unstoppable by any means. He and his team have a long way to go before matching Tim Duncan and the Spurs- obviously. The only reason you don't constantly hear of people comparing young players to Tim is there is rarely anyone out there you can mention in the same breath and not look stupid. Believe me Curry's coach knows this all too well.
Very true and well said.
He's the most skilled offensive player I've ever seen, but because of his stature, he obviously has a limited impact on the game outside of that, so I'll always place him below Jordan, Duncan, James and O'Neal.
2012 James or 2003 Duncan?
2012 James is the best all around player Ive ever seen. IIRC it was his last year as a two player. 2011 is up there but they didnt ring...
I'm going '03 Duncan slightly over '12 and '13 James.
They were both everything you'd want in a player, the difference was/is, Duncan's superior height/length. James could only have so much of an impact at "big man things", while Duncan could essentially do "guard things", only in a different way.
You are not allowed to play much defense in today's NBA. A great deal of Curry's scoring comes from free throws (bailouts). I think Nate Acrhibald (70s) in his prime was better, but got little love from the refs. Curry is a product of the times.
Jesus Christ
Welcome to upstairs spurstalk, where majority of posters are vanilla fossilized gots. Antiquated opinions are common around here
You're sucking Curry's in the wrong forum tbch. Go back downstairs where you belong.
like advocating basing an offense on a SF posting up
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
