Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 364
  1. #226
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    With the league going smaller, there's going to be a fire sale for most centers.

    There was a recent article that the Thunder are in are trouble because they invested heavily on guys like Adams, Kanter and Collison. Guys that don't translate well to small ball. Thunder was able to catch up with GSW only because they had Ibaka at C and Durant at the 4.

    The main perceived liability for Boban is his lack of quickness in defense. That's going to suppress teams from paying premium for him.

    Boban is an okay player, but he needs good teammates to compensate for his weaknesses and to exploit his strengths. You need players that funnel players to him on defense and are able to pass to him at the right spots in offense.

    There's also something weird about his screens in that the team is just going through the motions and not really using them.
    I have been critical that one of his minuses on offense is that he doesn't set good screens that free up the ball handler at all. It's like he just dances in space. It limits the offense to throwing him lobs and the post ups. He's got a high usage bc if he's playing you almost have to go to him every time or every other time bc he's not that effective setting screens or doing other stuff. I am not sure if the screens or pick setting is rookieshness or not. He's been playing basketball for years and pick and screen setting is a basic big skill.

    I do agree like all rookies he needs reps and to learn from his mistakes. Just some things I am skeptical of him improving bc he's new to the NBA but some things are fundamentals that a 27 yr roleplayer should know. Heck some big s screen and pick setting + rebounding and some defense is all they do.

  2. #227
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    That is assuming they will opt in and retire. I was assuming they don't pick up their options and just retire. If they do the former, the Spurs are kind of screwed, FA wise.

    If they opt in to their 2nd years, I think they will play. And the recent comments of both Tim and Manu wanting to get back on the court tells me they still have passion for the game, which is a good sign. The only change I really see is Bertans taking Bonner spot on the roster.
    Player options are rarely for the team's benefit. They're designed for the player to get money the team doesn't want them to get. Often, that manifests itself in bad players opting in, like RJ did a couple of seasons ago. Philosophically, though they are injury insurance, like Gerald Henderson picking up his option this year. If Tim and Manu wanted to be one and done, then a one-year deal makes the most sense. If they wanted to go one-and-one, then a one-year STILL made more sense, as it would have allowed both sides to maintain flexibility.

    So why did they sign a one-and-one deal? It was because they were undecided on coming back, but I believe the contingencies are the opposite of what you'd expect. If the oldies come back next year, I expect them to opt out, as it would allow for the team to potentially pursue a max free agent or failing that would allow for the Spurs to use their Bird rights to give both guys a nice send-off contract. If they plan to retire, on the other hand, they'll take the money owed to them, which the Spurs would gladly give, seeing as both guys got under-market value on their deals to allow the team to sign LMA.

    I will reiterate that you are correct that it could work out that the opt out to retire or opt in to return. I'm not going to act like my scenario is the only one that could work out. But the former situation is too good to hope for, while the latter would be inefficient. Opting out is better in any scenario in which the Spurs wouldn't try to force Manu or Tim to retire against their wills, which I think is a safe bet to not be the case.

  3. #228
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    I have been critical that one of his minuses on offense is that he doesn't set good screens that free up the ball handler at all. It's like he just dances in space. It limits the offense to throwing him lobs and the post ups. He's got a high usage bc if he's playing you almost have to go to him every time or every other time bc he's not that effective setting screens or doing other stuff. I am not sure if the screens or pick setting is rookieshness or not. He's been playing basketball for years and pick and screen setting is a basic big skill.

    I do agree like all rookies he needs reps and to learn from his mistakes. Just some things I am skeptical of him improving bc he's new to the NBA but some things are fundamentals that a 27 yr roleplayer should know. Heck some big s screen and pick setting + rebounding and some defense is all they do.
    The screen game is two ways and the way guys try to go around him as opposed to fighting through him makes the timing for both ballhandler and screener more difficult. I see what you are talking about but I also see it getting better.

    When Mills or Simmons come off a screen don't look for contact particularly if the defender goes around. Look to see if the ballhandler gets separation or at least with the defender behind them or on their hip. It's definitely a work in progress but he seems to have a sense of space and just needs time to figure out angles and timing. Pop is finding him minutes so things are looking up.

  4. #229
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Anyone else other than Chinook think West and/or Manu would opt-in and retire screwing the clubs cap situation? Particularly after they have already taken less money to help the club? Gerald Henderson's case is great and all but gmfb.

  5. #230
    Wanted: Dead or Alive Cowboys_Wear_Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    2,952
    Player options are rarely for the team's benefit. They're designed for the player to get money the team doesn't want them to get. Often, that manifests itself in bad players opting in, like RJ did a couple of seasons ago. Philosophically, though they are injury insurance, like Gerald Henderson picking up his option this year. If Tim and Manu wanted to be one and done, then a one-year deal makes the most sense. If they wanted to go one-and-one, then a one-year STILL made more sense, as it would have allowed both sides to maintain flexibility.

    So why did they sign a one-and-one deal? It was because they were undecided on coming back, but I believe the contingencies are the opposite of what you'd expect. If the oldies come back next year, I expect them to opt out, as it would allow for the team to potentially pursue a max free agent or failing that would allow for the Spurs to use their Bird rights to give both guys a nice send-off contract. If they plan to retire, on the other hand, they'll take the money owed to them, which the Spurs would gladly give, seeing as both guys got under-market value on their deals to allow the team to sign LMA.

    I will reiterate that you are correct that it could work out that the opt out to retire or opt in to return. But the former situation is too good to hope for, while the latter would be inefficient. Opting out is better in any scenario in which the Spurs wouldn't try to force Manu or Tim to retire against their wills, which I think is a safe bet to not be the case.
    When looking at other teams you're correct, and I would assume the worse. But this is the Spurs we're talking about. I just don't see Manu and Tim opting in and NOT PLAYING, knowing the needs the Spurs have to fill. It's just not them. This whole run of Tim, Manu, and Parker and now Kawhi and LMA has been too good to be true but its because the Spurs players sacrifice more than any players in the league. RJ wasn't Spurs material which is why he got shipped out.

    Spurs would glady give them the money and I wouldn't hate on them whatsoever if they did, but I just don't seeing them doing that. If they take that money and opt in, I would 90% they will be playing next season even if it is at a reduce capacity.
    Last edited by Cowboys_Wear_Spurs; 02-10-2016 at 12:48 PM.

  6. #231
    Wanted: Dead or Alive Cowboys_Wear_Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    2,952
    I have been critical that one of his minuses on offense is that he doesn't set good screens that free up the ball handler at all. It's like he just dances in space. It limits the offense to throwing him lobs and the post ups. He's got a high usage bc if he's playing you almost have to go to him every time or every other time bc he's not that effective setting screens or doing other stuff. I am not sure if the screens or pick setting is rookieshness or not. He's been playing basketball for years and pick and screen setting is a basic big skill.

    I do agree like all rookies he needs reps and to learn from his mistakes. Just some things I am skeptical of him improving bc he's new to the NBA but some things are fundamentals that a 27 yr roleplayer should know. Heck some big s screen and pick setting + rebounding and some defense is all they do.
    If you watch Boban Serbian Highlights, yes was basically Tim Duncan 15 years ago, meaning he lived in the post. Having to set screens and roll sometimes 2/3 times in one possession is something Boban is not accustomed to. The one Euro league that does do this is the Spanish league which is why guys like Gasol, Splitter were more acclimated to the current NBA offenses. That is why I am not surprised he isn't efficient at this point. But his screens are getting tighter and better by the week. So you can notice there is progression there.

  7. #232
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    When looking at other teams you're correct, and I would assume the worse. But this is the Spurs we're talking about. I just don't see Manu and Tim opting in and NOT PLAYING, knowing the needs the Spurs have to fill. It's just not them. This whole run of Tim, Manu, and Parker and now Kawhi and LMA has been too good to be true but its because the Spurs players sacrifice more than any players in the league. RJ wasn't Spurs material which is why he got shipped out.

    Spurs would glady give them the money and I wouldn't hate on them whatsoever if they did, but I just don't seeing them doing that. If they take that money and opt in, I would 90% they will be playing next season even if it is at a reduce capacity.
    Without disputing anything in your post, the question remains:

    Why include second year player options if not to retain the possibility of using them as farewell gifts to Tim and Manu?

  8. #233
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    When looking at other teams you're correct, and I would assume the worse. But this is the Spurs we're talking about. I just don't see Manu and Tim opting in and NOT PLAYING, knowing the needs the Spurs have to fill. It's just not them. This whole run of Tim, Manu, and Parker and now Kawhi and LMA has been too good to be true but its because the Spurs players sacrifice more than any players in the league. RJ wasn't Spurs material which is why he got shipped out.

    Spurs would glady give them the money and I wouldn't hate on them whatsoever if they did, but I just don't seeing them doing that. If they take that money and opt in, I would 90% they will be playing next season even if it is at a reduce capacity.
    The question is really how much this was talked about prior to this season. I feel that PATFO consulted pretty heavily with Tim and Manu on how to structure their contracts. The idea of deferred compensation is kinda like the elephant in the room. I doubt like you that Tim and Manu would screw the team over by retiring and pocketing the money without the team's blessing. But I think that could have been the plan all along. If everyone agreed to sacrifice this season and use next season to balance their books, then this upcoming storm is intentional and probably won't be bailed out.

  9. #234
    MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Post Count
    21,348
    Boban will be in a Spurs jersey next year. He also stated he was only coming to the NBA to play for the Spurs. ing re s.

  10. #235
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    The question is really how much this was talked about prior to this season. I feel that PATFO consulted pretty heavily with Tim and Manu on how to structure their contracts. The idea of deferred compensation is kinda like the elephant in the room. I doubt like you that Tim and Manu would screw the team over by retiring and pocketing the money without the team's blessing. But I think that could have been the plan all along. If everyone agreed to sacrifice this season and use next season to balance their books, then this upcoming storm is intentional and probably won't be bailed out.
    You have any proof at all that is the case other than incredulity that it could be anything else?

  11. #236
    MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Post Count
    21,348
    The level of sleuthing in ST is ridiculously low.

  12. #237
    Wanted: Dead or Alive Cowboys_Wear_Spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    2,952
    Without disputing anything in your post, the question remains:

    Why include second year player options if not to retain the possibility of using them as farewell gifts to Tim and Manu?
    Manu was signed with the BAE, so his 2nd year had to be in the contract. Duncan, I just thought he would play another season after this. With the LMA signing, Kawhi rise to s om, I think both think the Spurs have a shot to win a championship this year and next.

    I got a lot of out an interview I watched from Manu this offseason. He said he had to be truly sure that this was the end for him. He knew that if he hung it up it was for good and there wasn't going to be another shot of playing. So he asked himself, does he is still have the hunger and passion for playing. He told himself, yes. I still see it in him, enough that I see him coming back another season.

    I think the PO was there as a good faith gesture to both. So yeah, its up to them if they want to come back. And its up to them to opt in and retire or not opt in and retire. The ball is entirely in their court as it should be.

  13. #238
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    Without disputing anything in your post, the question remains:

    Why include second year player options if not to retain the possibility of using them as farewell gifts to Tim and Manu?
    To give them the opportunity to come back and play at the same rate. The opt-in and play option.

    I get what those options are normally used for and how agents/clubs conventionally use them in negotiations. Without disputing any of that the point remains: the Spurs are not conventional when it comes to how they do their deals.

  14. #239
    foaming at the nostrils raybies's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    6,472
    Imo Spurs signed him to a one year deal for a reason and that was because they are all in to win this year. Like I have said, he is a situational big. He can play against certain teams and that's it. He would have to grow alot with his positioning and still it would be iffy. For the right price he could be a solid 3rd center. But to pay money for a situational big would be folly. I old his character and work ethic but I would much rather have another big that can pick and roll and defend the room as well as not be a liability on D, whether it be pnr or in the post. I think there are some prospects in the draft in our range that can fit better. He's dominant on offense, I give y'all that but he's unplayable against our top 3 threats and I don't want to invest any money in any guy that's not gonna make a difference when it counts. With our cap situation it's something we can't afford to do.

  15. #240
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    You would think he failed on the pnr every time. You have to wonder how in a pnr league he manages to have a good defensive rating.

  16. #241
    MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Post Count
    21,348
    I've never said to start Boban(Unless duncan is out for some reason...). Just that he will be a Spur next year. Whatever that role is.

  17. #242
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    The LLE/BAE can be for one or two years.

  18. #243
    MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Post Count
    21,348
    2015-16 Real Plus-Minus - Centers


    RK NAME TEAM GP MPG ORPM DRPM RPM WINS
    1 DeAndre Jordan LAC 50 33.8 1.10 5.85 6.95 10.28
    2 DeMarcus Cousins SAC 43 34.2 2.76 3.90 6.66 9.19
    3 Tim Duncan SA 37 25.9 -0.47 6.95 6.48 5.79
    4 Nikola Jokic DEN 51 19.9 2.80 2.84 5.64 5.32
    5 Pau Gasol CHI 48 31.9 0.70 4.70 5.40 8.07
    6 Andre Drummond DET 53 33.6 0.11 4.45 4.56 8.43
    7 Kelly Olynyk BOS 53 20.5 1.41 3.12 4.53 5.30
    8 Zaza Pachulia DAL 50 29.6 0.39 3.95 4.34 6.47
    9 Andrew Bogut GS 44 20.8 -1.41 5.70 4.29 4.32
    10 Dwight Howard HOU 43 32.2 0.36 3.84 4.20 5.94
    11 Jared Sullinger BOS 53 23.3 0.30 3.76 4.06 5.57
    12 Ian Mahinmi IND 43 24.1 -0.97 4.91 3.94 4.62
    13 Rudy Gobert UTAH 31 33.3 -0.50 4.21 3.71 3.83
    14 Mason Plumlee POR 53 25.7 0.27 3.25 3.52 5.57
    15 Ed Davis POR 52 21.4 0.57 2.67 3.24 4.21
    16 Marc Gasol MEM 52 34.4 0.35 2.85 3.20 6.72
    17 Greg Monroe MIL 51 30.4 1.43 1.65 3.08 5.86
    18 Festus Ezeli GS 40 17.8 -0.06 3.10 3.04 2.89
    19 Boban Marjanovic SA 33 8.8 2.29 0.74 3.03 1.06
    20 Brook Lopez BKN 53 33.7 0.61 2.30 2.91 6.71



    Looking good to me for 5th big off the floor for the Spurs.

  19. #244
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    The LLE/BAE can be for one or two years.
    And Manu signed for the room exception, which can ALSO be for one or two years.

  20. #245
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    To give them the opportunity to come back and play at the same rate. The opt-in and play option.

    I get what those options are normally used for and how agents/clubs conventionally use them in negotiations. Without disputing any of that the point remains: the Spurs are not conventional when it comes to how they do their deals.
    They would have had full Bird Rights on both players even if they had signed one year deals with no options.

    I'm not going to pretend to know what went on during the negotiations between the players and the team, but I don't see any reason to dismiss the possibility that those options were included as potential golden parachutes.

  21. #246
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    They would have had full Bird Rights on both players even if they had signed one year deals with no options.

    I'm not going to pretend to know what went on during the negotiations between the players and the team, but I don't see any reason to dismiss the possibility that those options were included as potential golden parachutes.
    I'm not saying discount it. I'm saying there is no reason to insist on it.

  22. #247
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    I'm not saying discount it. I'm saying there is no reason to insist on it.
    Agreed.

  23. #248
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886


    And the way I recall it, they had to sign Manu and Tim and clear their holds before they could complete the LMA deal. They couldn't use their bird rights to pay more at that point as it would have taken away Aldridge's cap money. They slotted LMA and fit right up to the cap. It was masterfully done.

  24. #249
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367


    And the way I recall it, they had to sign Manu and Tim and clear their holds before they could complete the LMA deal. They couldn't use their bird rights to pay more at that point as it would have taken away Aldridge's cap money. They slotted LMA and fit right up to the cap. It was masterfully done.
    They signed Tim first, then LMA. They actually renounced Manu and then used the Room Exception after they used up their cap space. When you include the Leonard and Green signings, as well as the Splitter trade, it truly was masterfully done.

  25. #250
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    They signed Tim first, then LMA. They actually renounced Manu and the used the Room Exception after they used up their cap space. When you include the Leonard and Green signings, as well as the Splitter trade, it truly was masterfully done.
    Renouncing surrenders bird rights no?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •