holy . If Syrian Forces take the airport at the outskirts of ISIS stronghold Raqqa![]()
![]()
holy . If Syrian Forces take the airport at the outskirts of ISIS stronghold Raqqa![]()
![]()
IN OTHER news that will make your LOLz. Saudi Arabia has threatened to send their mighty ground forces into Syria
the same mighty Saudis that can't even control Yemenis fighting them with sticks and stones![]()
Yemen is a proxy war and if by sticks and stones you mean Iranian supplied arms then I agree. The WH has pushing all the Arab states to actually do something as opposed to riding the NATO and Russia's coattails. I doubt they actually do .
PErsonally I think we should depose the Sauds and shut down all the madrassas and similar schools. Actually give them some imperial occupation to about.
Yemen doesn't have an air force built, fueled and supported by USA. They also lack armored land units and even a naval force. Yes its stick and stones
Their guys dont even have boots. Wear sandals or bare feet![]()
Are the Iranians arming them with weapons and supplies or not? Your dodge is cute if typical.
Last time I checked, the Arabs haven't invaded Yemen. They are just bombing the out of it and blockading their ports. I'm not sure how youre supposed to 'control' land without actually sending people in.
"their rockets are too powerful vs our tanks, F16s and our US satellite intelligence"
Arabs have units in Yemen as well as various mercenary armies such as black water.![]()
I get there are all kinds of mercenaries but that isn't what we were talking about. It's a proxy war after all. Now youre dissembling.
Link to Arab state army in Yemen please.
By your logic then Iran is not fighting in Syria.
Or Russia for that matter![]()
Last edited by hater; 02-11-2016 at 02:59 PM.
Is Iran arming/manning Yemen in any way, shape or form?
Sure they are. With the equivalent of sticks and stones vs a squadron on F16s....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...frontline.html
There is the London Telegraph reporting Russian armored divisions in Syria. Please show something similar not from sputnik.com that shows Saudi deployments in Yemen. Quds and Hezbollah have been in Syria for years at this point.
http://www.latimes.com/world/middlee...205-story.html
LOLdon Telegraph
Why don't you just post a link fom MI6 newspress![]()
They gave them SAMs as well as a ton of infantry weapons/munitions. Nice dissemble though.
Btw I still dont see a difference between heavily armored Blackwater troops fighting for and paid by Saudi as opposed to Saudi troops. Same![]()
This coming from sputnik.com's biggest backer on the board. Telegraph is subject to the same AP/UPI verification as most major western outlets.
Now compare and contrast with sputnik.com and Russian state media that you like to cite.
You cannot tell the difference between mercenaries that you have yet to prove are even over there and a state army?
I get your trolling and intentionally obtuse but this is particularly stupid.
Soldiers paid by Saudi = Saudi forces
We can agree to disagree thou. But in my book
Soldier paid and fighting for Saudi = Saudi force
Like for example this opaque source that is not subject to the same vetting process.
Who gives a ? We're talking as third parties and no one who matter thinks that way outside the Krmelin. You go and be that island. I'll stay with objective reality and the west.
Wait so you are saying there is no propaganda coming from western news sources???are you serious?
Are you saying that you your mother????are you serious?!
6 year old meltdown
I win
No it was just to demonstrate that I could ask inane questions too. Stating your desired outcome in the form of an assenting question is easily seen as gratuitous nonsense by such a demonstration because prima facia its absurd.
So far we have me showing that Russia and Iran have their armies in Syria. You back up none of what you say.
People can judge how they please.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)