This. I almost lost my because I thought an offensive foul would have been called.![]()
Can't believe they didn't fall for Fisher's flop in OKC.
This. I almost lost my because I thought an offensive foul would have been called.![]()
It's amazing how a lot of people forget that on the previous possession of that game Ibacka got away with an obvious goaltend that the refs didn't call. I have felt them not calling a foul on that screen was a make up call for screwing up on not calling the goaltend.
The issue here is not the no call. That is bad. It cost a team a win. But for the NBA office to say that was legal, kinda proves one thing - they are protecting their new prize?
Dude looked like prime Larry Allen out there.. props
I ain't never forgetting that ing bull . Or the noncalls when Ibaka was hacking Duncan. Pretty sad when not calling a foul after a flop is a make up, but that's what you gotta deal with in OKC.![]()
I understand I just hate it when people show that clip 50 times in here as a counter to how the spurs get away with illegal screens without even realizing the context of that game which is the spurs got a lot of bs calls that went against them.
Same here.
Its like nobody ing reads what I say. All teams in the league set moving screens. Its just that Golden State shoots so well off their moving screens and so much off of them that they're getting noticed. If no teams in the league set moving screens, Golden State would STILL be the best team in the league.
Moving screens were once screens that just moved.
Gsw therefore didn't have any moving screens.
Two thumbs up...
![]()
![]()
You're being too kind. Look at how Malone rides Stockton's man away here. Like Joe Thomas riding a defensive end past the pocket.
It's been this way for years. It's like you can move your entire body as much as you want as long as you don't stick a particular body part out, like an elbow or a hip.
Again, this falls under the players decide category. Right or wrong, it's always been like that. Draymonds last screen was bad, but I get it.
But the warriors have taken to the it to the next level. The screen Malone set is set by Green all game long. They don't even try to hide it anymore because they clearly get away with it.
Holy , dude. They call illegal screens all the time that are iffy. That was atrocious! It really did look like a zone blocking scheme. It certainly appears as though the conspiracy theorists have a point.
After det 2006 Finals "win" the cHeat bet not say PERIOD.
This is getting really obvious now.
Sean Elliott has gone on record as pretty much saying the same thing. He said Stockton was so dirty with those forearms to the back and Malone was filthy as well.
NBA clearly is unfamiliar with the saying, "Often the cover-up is worth than the act." Just admit the ing obvious for 's sake. This isn't even debatable.
You have absolutely no ing right to complain about any NBA cheating til you've conceded that the Lakers 02 Championship is the biggest sham in league history.
I'm shocked that BBallbreakdown did this. They're sort of an unofficial PR wing for the league.
Horny didn't seem to have any doubt about that shot. Great to see them shutting the Houston crowd up, too.
make up call for Ibaka's missed goaltending
teams need to just elbowing and setting moving screens of their own against Curry. If the refs call it then they pretty much have to start acknowledging GSW screens if not than teams can just beat Curry for the remainder of the season
The Queens controlled their 4th quarter destiny. The closer the clock ticked towards 0:00, the narrower their windpipes became. It happens son - just like in 2000 with the Jail Blazers![]()
Surprised Bballbreakdown said something. He hates the Heat especially Wade.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)