The confounding difference is, Spurs defense vs 2006 Raptors defense.
Not just Green. There's been a lot of funky box scores with the staters. Seems like more than ever, the bulk of scoring is done by 3 starters and the other 2 are off the map completely whether that is Green or Duncan or TP
The confounding difference is, Spurs defense vs 2006 Raptors defense.
good . i hate Detroit, always have for some reason
that's a great in record
If not for the damn Dubs...![]()
Rasheed and his belts by any chance?
thats crazy
can't stand those chodes
Damn Dubs![]()
I still hate OKC worse as people, though
This may very well be the first season in NBA history with two 70-game winners.
Spurs are on pace to finish 70-12. Dubs are on pace to finish 76-6. Crazy.
Thing is, both teams may have their seeds locked up by the final week or so, and play their backups in the last several games.
Raw pace doesn't matter. We're ~75% of the way through the season, and have 3 meetings between the two teams. Adjusting for that, the Spurs are only on pace to win 68.2 games, while the Dubs are on pace to win 73.5.
Like I said, even that may not matter. Those head-to-head matchups at the end of the season may not matter that much, with the Dubs and Spurs locked into the 1 and 2 seeds.
In terms of records though. It will seriously hinder the possibility of both teams (especially the Spurs) getting to 70.
I think 66-67 is a fair prediction for us. 15-7 over our last 22, considering our schedule. We have to lose a couple home games, and we still have road games against both the Thunder and Warriors
What camera is this?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)