Reply With Quote
Cannot lie that is pretty damning.
But all that matters in the end ... Celts 17 Lakers 16.
They are one up on us because we gave one away in '84 and West and Company also failed us in '69? (before my time)
They have scoreboard.
Celtics vs Lakers playoff series.
Celtics 9 Lakers 3.
Since so many Laker posters like the History Channel so much.
Reminisce.
Cannot lie that is pretty damning.
But all that matters in the end ... Celts 17 Lakers 16.
They are one up on us because we gave one away in '84 and West and Company also failed us in '69? (before my time)
They have scoreboard.
In 1395 the Blankenheim Lakers defeated the Coevorden MooseHeads.
They took a round stone and saw who could throw it thru a bread carrying basket more times.
It wasn't really basketball, but close enough by Laker standards to count it. Go for it!
OP
Funny. But dont act like you wont count all 5 of the Spurs les 20 years from now ...heck the one from 1999 is old enough to drive to work and get legally married in some places.
Same city Sparky.
And the league had more then 4 teams of all white guys.
Salty.
How is that salty? All les are legit i didnt even * 1999. My point is your le is your le. If you are the same franchose even if you move it doesnt matter. Raiders have 2 in oakland iirc and 1 in LA they have 3 lombardis not just 2..
You the genius that cited the 9-3 which goes back before we were both born ...amirite? But geography matters here?
That's it and that's all tbh
Oh, , they were pissed in '85. in' livid. Stockton & Heinsohn stood there ashen faced, speaking in hushed tones like somebody had died.
We're not ing Rocket fan.
Boston Celtics 17 - Los Angeles Lakers 11.But all that matters in the end ... Celts 17 Lakers 16.
Celtics are a great franchise...its sad how they've only won once in the last 25 years tbh. Lakers V Celtics in the finals 4 life :'(
Yep. Only a moron Laker fan would actually count the ones from the Minneapolis days... that's like saying the Thunder have a ring because the Sonics won one in the 1970s.
The ownership group of the 90's was not very good.
No, Len Bias happened. Then Reggie Lewis happened...but then Lurch gave them ers Prime KG. SMDH
Well that was the difference between continuing the dynasty and not; but that was before the ownership group I spoke of, which was pretty bad.
Ok, this is amazingly good
Verdad. Repeating is a foreign language to Spur Fan
Big shots drafting him to play PG like Magic.
tee, hee. No more big shots.
Kills me every time
Kobe has as many rangs as the Spurs
it's the same franchise ... team name hasnt changed only the city ...genius.Yep. Only a moron Laker fan would actually count the ones from the Minneapolis days... that's like saying the Thunder have a ring because the Sonics won one in the 1970s.
BTW I saw your High IQ musings on the Cowboys message boards the other day ... the quality of your takes ...were equally insightful.
NBA Championships: Summary of Winners
This is a list with all the NBA teams that have won at least one NBA Championship.
With the Dallas Mavericks and their first le in 2010-11, seventeen franchises have won at least one NBA Championship. Three of them (Lakers, Warriors and 76ers) did it in different cities.
Only 5 teams, Celtics, Lakers, Bulls, Spurs and Warriors have won more than 3 championships, totaling between them 70 percent of the les.
les Teams Years
17
Boston Celtics
2007-08, 1985-86, 1983-84, 1980-81, 1975-76, 1973-74, 1968-69, 1967-68, 1965-66, 1964-65, 1963-64, 1962-63, 1961-62, 1960-61, 1959-60, 1958-59, 1956-57
16 Los Angeles Lakers
2009-10, 2008-09, 2001-02, 2000-01, 1999-00, 1987-88 , 1986-87, 1984-85, 1981-82, 1979-80, 1971-72 (as Los Angeles Lakers)
1953-54, 1952-53, 1951-52, 1949-50, 1948-49 (as Minneapolis Lakers)
6 Chicago Bulls 1997-98, 1996-97, 1995-96, 1992-93, 1991-92, 1990-91
5 San Antonio Spurs 2013-14, 2006-07, 2004-05, 2002-03, 1998-99
From NBA.com
http://www.nba.com/lakers/history
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
