i would say lance rentzal is mentally weak.
you agree?
translation
Show off a little bit for us Avante, ok? Show us something only you can do ok?
Sure.
NFL 1000 yard rushers out of USC.
Mike Garrett
O.J.Simpson
Charles White
Marcus Allen
Ricky Bell
Sm Cunningham
Reggie Bush
Lendale White
Yep, multi talented
i was just using old school football guys that you can relate to.
what other football players compare to you and lance?
translation
Wow!
Give me USC 's fantasy 4x1 team?
Cool~~~~
leading off...Lennox Miller...Jamaica, an Oly silver.bronze at 100m
second..Andre DeGrasse...Canada, the school 100m record holder and their first sub10.00. Won the bronze(tied) ay the 2015 Worlds in the 100m
third..Don Quarrie...Jamaica, an Oly 200m champ (what ya want on the curve) silver in the 100m
anchor...James Sanford...top ranked in the world at 100m back in the day.
what makes them like you and lance?
translation
Amazing~~~~
So what about that UCLA fantasy 4x1?
Cool~~~
leadoff...Mike Marsh....Oly 200m gold
second...Ato Boldon...Oly 100m bronze, Trinidad
third,...Millard Hampton..Oly 200m silver
anchor...Warren Edmonson...NCAA Champ
Getting back to evolution.
What current creature was the last to evolve into what we now see? Remember it's always been evolving.
So when did the lion, tiger, cheetah, jaguar break off into what they would become today? Obviously since we all came from the same ancesters they must have all been the same cat sometime...right? So what happened there? Why do we need a jaguar?
Now, we have the spider, ant, potato bug, roach, what's the deal there? So they came from the same ancesters as the frog?
Hmmmm?
How'd we get the camel? And where are all those ...going to be the camel...at? And how do we explain the amazing hummingbird? Why do we have them?
Last edited by Avante; 03-17-2016 at 12:37 AM.
False assumption. Your understanding of evolution is so bad.
But you've got it figured out the way you want, why waste time when there's a music YouTube out there for you to watch
So all living things on earth can trace their ancesters back back back back to the same glob of goo at the bottom of the ocean....right?
What exactly is your theory.
My theory is we will never really know how this all came about. As we all know science has been wrong so many times we can't really rely on that and the rest of us are clueless. So like religions we pick the one we like best.
To think we got all these totally different life forms from a common ancester is stupid. To think some al powerful being just....zap~~~ life.....is also pretty lame. Then we have....did Aliens.....hmmm? But that is no more far fetched than the other two.
Like you and everyone else I don't know how this came about.
So all three theories you have are lame? You really can't come up with a good one?
Haha so limited.
How can anyone with even half a brain think this glob of goo on an ocean bottom, all of a sudden.........
ZAP~~~~ LIFE
They came from OUTER SPACE.
You got one?
Bored with that.
Let's talk about you, so who do ya listen to and why? Favorite author?
So what exactly was this glob of goo on the ocean bottom, where did it come from and why did it need to do anything?
So this glob of goo evolved into a shark, a whale, a jellyfish, a sea snail, a squid.....why?
Hmmmm?
Questions about life’s origin are as old as Genesis and as young as each new morning. For scientists, there are no definitive answers. But if no one has yet pinned down the secret, it hasn’t been for lack of trying. Those investigating the origin of life are a rambunctious, scrappy group, in which no two people see things quite the same way; and it doesn’t help that it’s awfully tough to prove or disprove any particular contention. After all, how can you really know what happened when Earth formed 4.6 billion years ago? Two things these scientists can agree on, however, are that the first kinds of life, whatever they were, must have been able to reproduce themselves and must have carried information.
Hmmmm?
by Jim Schicatano
The earliest evidence of life on planet Earth may date as far back as 3.85 billion years ago.1 At that time the first simple, single-celled organisms called "prokaryotes" may have appeared. The exact scientific process that led to the creation of prokaryotic life still eludes scientists today. Whether these early organisms metabolized energy through the process of photosynthesis (utilizing light) or by another method, such as chemosynthesis (utilizing chemicals), is also unknown.
The origin of life on planet Earth has long baffled the scientific community. Although many theories have been proposed, there is no consensus as to how life first originated on the Earth. Science believes that the Earth's early atmosphere consisted of gases such as methane, hydrogen, ammonia, and steam. These gases may have combined with electrical discharge from lightning (other energy sources are also possible) to produce organic compounds. Organic compounds, which include A group of 20 different kinds of small molecules that link together in long chains to form proteins. Often referred to as the "building blocks" of proteins.amino acids, are recognized as the building-blocks of life.
Scientists acknowledge that even simple single-celled organisms are far more complex than the organic compounds that could have been formed from the pre-biotic conditions of ancient Earth. Yet, the origin of life is believed to have begun from some similar natural process and progressed through many steps over the span of millions of years, until the first singled-celled life was created.
There are many scientific problems with this scenario, but the timing involved may prove most problematic. Before 3.8 billion years ago scientists believe that the Earth's surface was still in a state of considerable upheaval, as the last of the nebular debris bombarded the Earth. The appearance of life at that time is puzzling to many scientists, since it is not believed that the precursors of life could have survived such an inhospitable environment. Yet, life managed to make its appearance at the conclusion of that turbulent time and survive. This allows an almost a negligible time-frame for the building-blocks of life to progress naturally into living organisms.
The natural processes that scientists have theorized to explain the origin of life are far too complex to be explained here. But from a Biblical perspective all of these theories contradict the Biblical Genesis. If life can only propagate "according to their kinds" as proclaimed by the Bible, it would be unacceptable to embrace the concept of life arising from non-living matter. Even if the change occurring within each individual step of the transformation was so minuscule and so gradual that such steps could be argued as acceptable Biblical propagations, the overall transformation from lifeless matter to living creatures over time cannot be accepted.
And it goes on and on,.....
Nobody really knows, and it's obvious.
Last edited by Avante; 03-17-2016 at 02:53 PM.
It's time to start talking about you little guy.
So who do ya listen to and why?
Notice how all this midget wants to do is talk about others?
Last edited by Avante; 03-17-2016 at 03:54 PM.
So what do ya do for a living slick? And, what hobbies do ya have?
Pretty sad little guy, no personality at all...none~!
To answer your question:
Arguing on the internet, reading, gaming.
You do that for a living?
That was the hobbies.
If you want to know what I do for a living, you could... check my profile.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
