inb4 1000 pages
Take it with a grain of salt.
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/eye-on-...e-kevin-durant
500 pgs mega thread with five bannings
Last edited by BatManu20; 03-17-2016 at 12:44 PM.
Can't have three max contracts. Don't wanna lose Aldridge. Not gonna happen.
It doesn't make much sense. Just between Aldridge, Leonard, Parker, and Green they're at $62.6 million committed. With an $89 million cap Durant's going to be looking at $31 million starting, and the Spurs would already have a payroll $4.6 million too high between those four players to accomodate Durant. And they're not going to tell West to go himself after the huge paycut he took to come here, nor should they. Durant is really only doable if the Spurs salary dump Parker in the offseason, assuming Duncan and Ginobili both retire. It's one thing to salary dump Splitter for an Aldridge who looked like he was out of Portland for sure, but to dump Tony when Durant has always shown a lot of loyalty to OKC?
pipe dream, but yeah (as the article states) a front court of Leonard, Aldridge and Durant would be mind blowing.
Welp, lets get this on the road...
Would Durant be a better PG than Porker?
Should Leonard be taking more shots than Durant?
Was Durant worth it?
Can Durant play backup SF?
I think a much more realistic target (and someone I'd love to have if Timmy retires) is Al Horford. Would be a perfect fit alongside LMA.
Quite far fetched from a dollar perspective, but yep that would be a nasty nasty front court.
No ing way dude goes to GSW, not after what he saw with Lebron going to Miami![]()
Not that I'm all for gutting the team to sign Durant, but they could always backload it. Plus, they showed little regard for the luxury tax this Summer, and I gotta think Manu and Tim would be all for returning one last year if they made this happen (on potentially minimum deals).
Because Parker is borderline useless on offense and a liability on defense and botches clutch free throws.
No they can't.
You can't get into the luxury tax when you're signing a new free agent (i.e. from a different team) with a larger contract than the MLE.
The Spurs will never trade or cut Parker tbh. They are loyal to a fault unfortunately and will see his contract fully over the next two years as his production continues to decline.
Don't want that whiny got loser on the Spurs.
Don't really know the system like Chinook tbh, was just a thought.
Yeah, they can. Just not would just cost a couple of rotation players with not real means of replacing him. Though, I guess it's possible for the Spurs to get enough if they just trade Parker...![]()
Meh. I hate Durant but dude, we'd win like 5 les in 5 years.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)