Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Veteran InRareForm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    8,644

  2. #2
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    6,573
    I wanted beach front property at one time, but was told at a real estate office of the wet sand rule where you can't really own the land the tide might touch. Rather not have hippy heads a few feet from my property with a bond fire

    Rules are rules, home owners should back off tbh.

  3. #3
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    I think it would be re ed to go to a beach right in front of the Geffen's home and I would never do it, but I appreciate that the law keeps cities from selling off their beaches. What a travesty if you had to pay an entrance fee to go to a beach in the LA area if everything became privately owned.

  4. #4
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    they benefit if beach recedes, got more land

    now if high tides and increase in water then they lose out, even with erosion on the sand banks biting up their land away they still lose out and ask council tax payer funded to fix that bull

  5. #5
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    6,573
    they benefit if beach recedes, got more land

    now if high tides and increase in water then they lose out, even with erosion on the sand banks biting up their land away they still lose out and ask council tax payer funded to fix that bull
    you get drunk before posting here, bro?

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,009
    I think it would be re ed to go to a beach right in front of the Geffen's home and I would never do it, but I appreciate that the law keeps cities from selling off their beaches. What a travesty if you had to pay an entrance fee to go to a beach in the LA area if everything became privately owned.
    here in chile, law says its illegal but rich s bribe/strong arm their way to get "special" rights over sections of coast, which they mostly use to build resorts/ luxury condos. Even when people catch on and protest and city council members whistle blow, they still manage to pull it off most times. the law is a joke. no entrance fee, but absurd parking rates basically amount to one.

  7. #7
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    Here in the Jersey shore, most counties charge a fee for beach access between May and September... Mostly because it gets full of Bennies...

    But they should really not charge if you show a local DL, tbh...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •