So you gave up on him?
It's about time.
He gave up 31 points to a guy who averages 9 in the D-League
Basketball is a team sport. On Berry's first three, Jimmer rotated to cover the open three shooter in the corner and the next guy didn't make his rotation.So you gave up on him?
It's about time.
He gave up 31 points to a guy who averages 9 in the D-League
FACE
Jimmer gave up some of the easiest buckets ever in transition because he completely lost his man and did not even consider the driving lanes. He just ran to the ball like he was going to get a chance to shoot it. It's like he just started playing the game.
Basketball is indeed a team sport. Jimmer lets his team down on D regularly. That is reason #1 or 2 he is not in the NBA
He should get KA's minutes in the playoffs. Let's face it, fathead is not ready and pop has shown some signs of that thinking.
You don't have to trash Jimmer to cover up for the fact that you're a closet Jimmer fan. You're in a safe zone, bruh.Jimmer gave up some of the easiest buckets ever in transition because he completely lost his man and did not even consider the driving lanes. He just ran to the ball like he was going to get a chance to shoot it. It's like he just started playing the game.
Basketball is indeed a team sport. Jimmer lets his team down on D regularly. That is reason #1 or 2 he is not in the NBA
Jimmer is not an NBA player. Nothing against him personally. Seems like he might be a , but that wouldn't keep him from being in the NBA.
That'd be racism as you already postulated.
Man, I struck a nerve.
No, that'd be his play breaking and complete defensive inep ude as he demonstrated tonight.That'd be racism as you already postulated.
I don't know how you'd figure that. It's not a secret that you're a bit of a .
Well, you certainly walked back your original theory by claiming that racism doesn't exist in the inner city
More emoticons? Yep. Nerve: sruck.I don't know how you'd figure that. It's not a secret that you're a bit of a .
Funny, I never made such a claim at any time -- but you must be feeling the pressure to make something up at this point. You never proved your claim that racism is prevalent in the inner city.Well, you certainly walked back your original theory by claiming that racism doesn't exist in the inner city
Go ahead and prove it now.
I have a feeling I have struck another nerve.
Like you say, "desperate times." Just another sad series of reaches by you. How can that not be funny? But I'll show how 'un-nerved' I am by withholding said emoticon on this on.
You were quite definitive in your assertion that racism isn't prevalent in the inner city. Is that where you're splitting hairs; that I over-stated the fact? Funny how you couldn't just say that. Yea, I wouldn't want to have to stand by that sh***y take either.
You're at zero percent on struck a nerve calls; sort of a funny reality given the manner in which you announced yourself to this thread.
lol now you're changing your behavior because of something I posted? Damn.
My assertion is that you didn't prove your claim that racism is prevalent in the inner city.You were quite definitive in your assertion that racism isn't prevalent in the inner city. Is that where you're splitting hairs; that I over-stated the fact? Funny how you couldn't just say that. Yea, I wouldn't want to have to stand by that sh***y take either.
Your claim remains unproved.
Since you can't prove your claim, there is no reason for me or anyone to accept it as true.
Do you understand now or do you need to have your claim further explained to you?
And feel free to post any, and I do meant any evidence to back up your claim. You have yet to do so.
I figure my challenging you to prove your claim will strike yet another nerve as you will do nothing to prove your claim but start some other rant or diversion tactic.You're at zero percent on struck a nerve calls; sort of a funny reality given the manner in which you announced yourself to this thread.
What's there to prove? You said racism isn't prevalent in the inner city in a shameless attempt to surmise that Jimmer never faced racism in the NBA. That's all on the record.
Your claim that racism is prevalent in the inner city.
You failed to prove it.
Now you have another chance to prove it.
So prove it.Nope. I said you didn't prove your claim that racism is prevalent in the inner city. That's all on the record.You said racism isn't prevalent in the inner city in a shameless attempt to surmise that Jimmer never faced racism in the NBA. That's all on the record.
Feel free to go back and look.
I don't think he carved up any role. He did enough to merit being another regular season rotation player next season, and hopefully improve. Look, I'm not hating, he's show glimpses of potential to be more than what he is, but he's not been consistent in that. Your argument is that he should keep on getting minutes to clean that up, and I agree, but next season. Right now, IMO, what the team needs is to give minutes to players Pop is most likely to play in the playoffs, and I don't think Kyle is really high on that list. I could certainly be wrong about that.
The Jimmer Thread is now a franchise:
Jimmer Thread II.
Son of Jimmer Thread.
Revenge of Jimmer Thread.
Soon to be a series on Netflix.
Guess what, Spurt? At this point, even Jimmer knows he doesn't belong in the NBA. You're the only holdout.
I'm trying to guess how much Spurt gets paid for each positive Jimmer post and whether he works for Jimmer or Jimmer's agent or the LDS Church.
Oh, the possibilities. Today, I could prove racism in the inner city. Tomorrow, I could prove the sky is blue....
Why can't you prove that racism is prevalent in the inner city?
You've had every opportunity to do so, yet you continuously fail.
Well Pop testing players certainly meant your priorities are not his. By you he wouldn't be playing.
Well, no. What I mean is that his role should be starting to diminish at this point, and if Pop is thinking going with KMart on a more ample role for the playoffs, then his minutes should increase.
I could very well be wrong, and that might not happen, but we'll see.
I think you are just refusing to acknowledge that Kyle has been a useful player that has helped us win games and who adds good things to our team, bc of that you see no point in playing him at this stage, when the reality is different. He's helped us win a lot of games and had a few stretches playing without Manu that Tony himself said he was probably playing better than any of them in the team. He was scoring efficiently, but I doubt that is what it was about bc so were other ppl. More than anything, he was executing defensively.
I think if Kmart was able to execute what Pop wants defensively then it would be a clear cut decision for Pop, but he hasn't and its not. Him scoring a few in garbage time doesn't tilt the scales more in his direction than Boban doing it. If he can't execute the defensive scheme Pop wants and you can't hide him he won't play.
Won't debate everything else bc we have been through it. You know the roles KA has played and how good he's been in them.
Fathead has a negative RPM. Dude isn't winning us .
Tldr if u think kyle is a scrub then ur not acknowledging sumthing or is a trollFathead has a negative RPM. Dude isn't winning us .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
