Reply With Quote
Thank you for supporting my case.
That's true. Even when he's married, he always cherishes woman.
Thank you for supporting my case.
lol lies
Give me a break.
why, because it happens to be inconvenient for the candidate you support?
he berates women all the time, but then follows it up with a backhanded compliment by commenting on how attractive they are, reducing them to their appearance. happens all the time, even did it on in stage to carly fiorina
Last edited by spurraider21; 04-04-2016 at 11:38 PM.
Carly is really a nasty person. I don't like to say that about anyone but she gets very nasty. Melania, on the other hand, is a smart woman and I like that she is more than looks. She would make a great first lady.
wow. that literally has nothing to do with anything i said
that was a trump-esque dodge. i'm surprised you didnt brush it off by talking about political correctness then change the topic about how we have so many problems, trade with china, etc
So it's cool to suggest a woman is on her period when the questions get too tough?
He cherishes women...
Jesus...
No, it has something to do with what you said. Point is he's a counter-puncher. He counter-punches women... No wait, that sounds bad, but he does not discriminate when defending himself. If you attack, he attacks back and the people who he supposedly "berates" weren't just totally innocent... so let's drop this silly narrative that he doesn't respect woman and is just looking to harass them.wow. that literally has nothing to do with anything i said
that was a trump-esque dodge. i'm surprised you didnt brush it off by talking about political correctness then change the topic about how we have so many problems, trade with china, etc
What? You're a deviant for even thinking that's what he meant! Sick!
what about when he told a female reporter that she "only has her job because she's beautiful"
what about when he told a woman that "she must have looked good on her knees"
You are an idiot if you did not.
I'm not familiar with those instances. I need context.
You're the idiot. Clearly.
NO ONE is stupid enough to say that. And to be honest, I didn't think that when I first heard it. If you did, that's on you and the other sickoes.
DMX trollin fools left and right.
Thats illegal at this hour.DMX trollin fools left and right.
And he Fkn knows this.
Play by the rules.
DMX is a liberal at heart.
And yet, some in Priebus’ party can’t seem to let go of their dream. Politico reported this morning there are still “top” Republican insiders talking up the idea of nominating House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.).
On the eve of the Wisconsin primaries, top Republicans are becoming increasingly vocal about their long-held belief that Speaker Paul Ryan will wind up as the nominee, perhaps on the fourth ballot at a chaotic Cleveland convention.
One of the nation’s best-wired Republicans, with an enviable prediction record for this cycle, sees a 60 percent chance of a convention deadlock and a 90 percent chance that delegates turn to Ryan – ergo, a 54 percent chance that Ryan, who’ll start the third week of July as chairman of the Republican National Convention, will end it as the nominee.
The piece, from Politico’s Mike Allen, added that the Wisconsin congressman is “more calculating and ambitious than he lets on.” It added that Ryan “is running the same playbook he did to become speaker: saying he doesn’t want it, that it won’t happen. In both cases, the maximum leverage is to not want it – and to be begged to do it.”
The Speaker happens to be in Israel right now, but he called into Hugh Hewitt’s conservative radio show this morning to once again he rejects the speculation. “I think you need to run for president in order to be president,” Ryan said. “I’m not running for president, so, period. End of story.”
Except, it’s probably not the end of the story.
The Republicans and pundits keeping these embers burning have been quick to note, accurately, that Paul Ryan made similar comments after John Boehner’s retirement, saying he wouldn’t be a candidate for Speaker. The Wisconsin Republican, we now know, can be talked into accepting great power when it’s offered to him on a platter – which means the speculation will continue, probably until the convention itself.
But so long as the chatter continues, let’s keep a few relevant details in mind.
The first is the simple fact that if Republicans hold 50+ nominating contests over a six-month period, and then nominate someone who did not run for president – and has said repeatedly that he does not want to be president – the prospect of party-wide chaos shouldn’t be dismissed too quickly.
Second, the assumption that Paul Ryan represents electoral magic for the GOP continues to be wrong. The Speaker was on the Republican ticket four years ago – when he failed to win his home state – and recent polling suggests the American mainstream doesn’t share the Beltway’s affection for the GOP House leader.
Finally, let’s say for the sake of conversation that all of the obvious hurdles simply disappear.
Let’s imagine convention delegates were willing to embrace Ryan without controversy; the Speaker decided he wouldn’t mind being president after all;
the party wouldn’t fracture; and polls turned in his favor.
Even then, the idea would be dubious on the merits:
The Republican Party would find itself in late July with a presidential nominee who has no campaign infrastructure, no platform, no stump speech, no staff, and no money.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow
Repugs are so ed, no matter which extremist s bag they nominate.
Bovada removed the odds on trump to win repub.
oddschecker has a little over even money for trump to win repub.
cruz down to 2 to 1
The next few weeks the US populace will take one good long look at Ted Cruz and come running back to Trump
Classic case of we ed up but we should stick to the guy not possessed by Satan
I love how Cruz revels in his victory as if the people who voted for him actually like him.
here's the kind of authoritarian, violent bully attracted to Trump
"So the fix is in. If Trump does not run the table on the rest of the primaries and the caucuses, we’re looking at a very, very narrow path in which the kingmakers go all out to cheat, to steal, and to snatch this nomination from the candidate who is overwhelmingly selected by the voters, which is why I have urged Trump supporters:
come to Cleveland.
March on Cleveland. Join us in the Forest City.
We’re going to have protests, demonstrations. We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in the steal.
If you’re from Pennsylvania, we’ll tell you who the culprits are.
We urge you to visit their hotel and find them.
You have a right to discuss this if you voted in the Pennsylvania primary, for example, and your votes are being disallowed."
http://wonkette.com/600397/trump-pal-roger-stone-promises-anti-trump-rnc-delegates-room-service-with-fists
"right to discuss"
news?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
