Reply With Quote
It's always hilarious when you butt in as an authority of some kind.
TSA is correct that the standard US military magazine is 30 rounds.
It's always hilarious when you butt in as an authority of some kind.
"....The term high capacity ammunition magazines (sometimes called large capacity magazines or high capacity ammunition feeding devices) generally refers to gun magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. But statutory definitions vary. A 1994 congressional ban on magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition expired in 2004 and was not renewed. Consequently, high capacity ammunition magazines are legal unless banned by state or local governments. Connecticut does not regulate the magazines.
Six states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) currently ban or restrict large capacity magazines. Maryland defines a “large capacity magazine” as a magazine capable of accepting more than 20 rounds.*New Jersey defines it as one capable of accepting more than 15 rounds, and California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, and D.C. define it as a magazine capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. (On January 15, 2013, the NY Legislature amended its law. Beginning March 16, the law defines high capacity magazines as magazines capable of firing more than seven rounds..........."
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/rpt/2013-R-0039.htm
https://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.h...&f=17&t=492379
Seems like your favoritewebsite said it
What part of "standard capacity for the firearm Adam Lanza used" are you having trouble comprehending?
What does California's definition of magazine capacity have to do with anything? Are California's 10 round magazines called standard or limited? Why would California make a law to define something already considered standard?
Everyone seems to be calling more than 10 rounds high capacity
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lawmakers...ty-magazines-0
Lanza used ar 15 with 30 round capacity.
No idea where you're getting "standard capacity" from unless it's military language
"*U.S.*+
Gun sales drive demand for high capacity magazines
February 24
*
LAS VEGAS
America's zeal for guns is driving sales of one of the industry's most controversial accessories: high capacity magazines.
High capacity magazines that carry 10 or more rounds, have been banned in eight states. But sales are strong where they're still legal, fueled by fears that they'll soon be subject to tighter regulations.
The popularity of the magazines prompted Jarret Mock to launch the startup TorkMag last year in Fort Myers, Florida. His startup makesmagazines that hold 35 or 50 rounds. The magazines, which sell for $22 or $40,*are for AR-15s.
....
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/24/smal...ity-magazines/
I always look to the MSM when trying to find proper gun terminology"clips"
I'm starting to get it....gun strokers want to make sure it's called "standard capacity" so that it doesn't sound so evil.
It's called standard capacity because it's the standard capacity. Ill informed people like yourself and the MSM call them high capacity in an attempt to make them sound evil. Same way you refer to the modern sporting rifle AR15 as an assault rifle even though less than 1% of them are used in firearm homicides.
Yeah, I get it already. You and other gun ers want to make sure that everyone knows it's called standard capacity. I even found a T shirt for sale on amazon saying that.
30 round standard capacity is a high capacity. That's the point.
muh gun
If you call a 30 round mag high capacity, what capacity do you call 100 round mag?
High.
Ask me about a 1000 round capacity
She needed a gun here, imo
Doesn't exist.
How many rounds are in a standard capacity AR15 magazine?
A high amount.
It's always hilarious when your ignorance is totally exposed.
I asked for a number. How many rounds are in a standard capacity AR15 magazine?
Meh, yours is funnier.
Looks like 30.
Who labels it as "standard"?
What's standard capacity for a B52 bomber
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
