Reply With Quote
ing pathetic.
ing pathetic.
You guys wanted a reduced Parker role and you got it. Good luck!
It would be nice if Pork could at least stay on his feet on D.
This is f'in pathetic.
Lol Spurs. Barely a top 15 team at this point.
No playoffs for you (again).
They should be ashamed.
the sad part is that i could see this happening 2 or 3 times in a series..in the past two months alone, we probably had 5 games when both combined for such disgusting points haul..
The crew will be along shortly to call this a deflection thread.
Seriously, you can't make those numbers up. It would be a fluke if it was one game but it's happened quite a bit this season.
CIA Pop tbh. He sends Tony/Danny to stink the place.
When Pop shows his hand they'll score 40-50 per game combined.
Backcourt?
Curry + Klay = 51pts
DWest(4) + Danny(2) + Porker(4) + Paddy(7) + Gino(8) + KMart(9) + Kyle(4) + Boban(4) = 42pts
No chit.
For all of his *experimenting* wtf could they not have had a couple games with Anderson running the point.
Pop showed his hand last night Kmart, KA, and Boban in the 4th. Why did he let them know the secret plan? Why Pop??!!
You guys didn't want Tony Parker to shoot the ball so much.
As long as those 2 or 3 ty games also occur when the rest of the roster is have a ty night or when Wardell is going off then it shouldn't matter since they would lose the game anyways. Porker/Danny just have to show up in 4 out of 7 games thus they can play as ty as they want for 2 or 3 games.
Parker's role ain't reduced...he's just sucking. He's still on the court, just not doing .
Geesh...lol
If that's Porker's reduced role, just imagine how badly he'd have been blown the out in an expanded role.
ing terrible
You do realize that this is why people don't want Porker shooting so much, right?
Porker fluffers are either really dumb, really bad trolls, or both.
[QUOTE=Mul roll;8525293][/QUOTE
]
Not a Lakers fan, but at least they were able to beat the Warriors by a decisive amount.
Code:2016-17 2017-18 Tony Parker 33 $14,445,313 $15,453,126
You're gonna need to explain this to me.
The Spurs' backcourt is badly outscored, Danny Green is the worst shooter on the entire team from both 2 and from 3, and your solution is for the guy shooting 49 percent from the floor to ... shoot less.
Does it cancel out losing by 48?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
