Fabbs leaving no doubt about his hate of religious freedom
Originally Posted by Mul roll
Blake hates seeing plans involving nail bombs and machine gunning and explosives killing innocents get thwarted.Neighborhoods they are in should have been swept ages ago.
Fabbs leaving no doubt about his hate of religious freedom
Blake hates seeing the *religious freedoms* of UnIslamic terrorists be curbed.
He'd rather they have the freedom to blow up innocents such in Paris, Belgium, New York City, San Bernadino etc .
Blake loves it when terrorists the world wide globe over to have freedom to murder.
So censoring the French Presidents comments is not "gubmit" interference? boutons, do you consider that polite? and decent?vy65
Now, if it bothers you that it culturally might reflect poorly on your persona, then that's entirely your problem.
I think most conservatives would classify their criticism as a cultural/social one. I don't think that they're claiming the gubmint is mandating political correctness.
White House censors French president for saying ‘Islamist terrorism’
http://nypost.com/2016/04/02/white-h...rrorism-quote/
Really, would you mind telling that to your Liberal buddies that refuse to let others say something they disagree with? Like "Black Lives Matter" and college students who have refused to let some people speak at their colleges. You are full of it. You know I am right, pure and simple. And even our glorious President who censors the leaders of other nations. Grow up.
you conflated POTUS with BLM? the race delusion is as bad as the god delusion.
No, you have a problem with comprehension. The subject was PC and Free Speech. Both the BLM and President were censoring the speaker. BLM to the point, in one instance, of taking over the podium of a candidate for President. And how many instances have there been where college students(?) have shouted down or rushed the stage of Conservative speakers. Refusing to let them speak.
Gp bacl and read my answers in my post.
So what exactly do you propose to do about Islam in America?
Nothing, except ask for more cooperation in identifying the extremists. UnIslamic terrorism?
Act on intelligence. Neighborhoods that are hot beds such as the Beligium hood that housed the bombing gots should be turned upside down. Rights of innocents to live >>>>>>>>>>>> outweighs you getting upset because Abdeslams underwear drawer was upset in a search that thwarts a bombing.
The Wahhabi movement started the idea of incorporating the Hadiths as the word of God. In my opinion, if a wahabbi is spotted anywhere, he should be either stabbed or shot on sight.
America doesn't have the same problem as Belgium or European. There no extremist neighborhoods breeding terrorists because Muslims have been scrutinized as much as anyone in this country since 9/11.
So everyone in the neighborhood gets their underwear drawers turned over?
If intelligence shows potential bombers like the Belgium s, done.
I don't care if you are in the room sniffing them at the time of the search.
Prove it.
The first Hadith were created by Abu and the Damascenes before the 7th century was even over. They set up their court system and the like based on it. They have been touted as the words of the prophet since the beginning.
But grandiose rhetoric like "Political Correctness will be death of our country" is ridiculous. You don't agree with cultural changes? That's fine, you're far from the first person to feel that way, and how you feel is entirely your problem.
You supplied individuals while I asked for specific neighborhoods that were considered breeding ground for terrorism.
Hadiths have always been touted as the words of Mohammad, but the Wahabbi movement in the 18th-19th century made it mandatory to follow all Hadiths and made them equal to the Koran.
NOW, we get to the issue here. Those "some people" you refer to can speak freely, but the fact that either there's no audience or that the audience disagree with the message is what really bothers you. Again, this is YOUR problem.
There's nothing stopping anybody from being xenophobes, Islamophobic, racists, make gross generalizations... nothing. Whether there's an audience for that is a completely different story.
Generally speaking, we've largely moved on from those things culturally as a society for a while now, for a number of reasons (among them, logically speaking, there's a lot to lose for taking those positions, whereas there's nothing to lose by not adopting them).
In the end, you either adapt to the times we're living, or you'll probably die a bitter man.
The FBI page gave some neighborhoods. Here are more:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/galleri...-capitals.html
If Donny Trump gets elected we'll be shaking down these breeding grounds.
2. Little puss asses like Zuckerberg at Facebook and the Apple got will cooperate or be jailed.
I'm not even a big fan of everything PC, but I completely understand why it happens. ie: why companies boycott states with this BS "religious freedom" laws which are really a not-so-subtle attempt to go after the LGBT community.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)