Reply With Quote
Living rent free made easy.
i dno, Reck seems pretty passionate...
Living rent free made easy.
http://bluenationreview.com/speaker-...cratic- s/
Sanders people have a surrogate problem. They're always saying the stupidest .
Amateurs.
So what do you think of his surrogates? Agree or disagree they need to vet who speaks before going out and embarrassing Bernie?
This is just one more thing he has to defend. Dollars to donuts this comes up in tonight's debate.
the irony
What is? I could say the same about you and the Bernie bros. You're always semen shielding for the dude.
Suddenly is a one way street in which you can defend him to your heart content but when someone takes the opposite position is a no no. Lol re ed.
Swing and a miss.
Not really. You just don't want to admit you're doing the same.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...ZSAPEC2TAP0RGD
Bernie supporters getting creepy and stalkish.
z0sa your thoughts? Or are you going to keep ducking my questions?
Like college kids can't be duped?
Feelin the burn definitely has the hipster vote. And it is very difficult not to like the guy because of the other 3 major candidates. So he is your safer vote when talking to a stranger. Burn is much easier to defend on a cursory level.
Hillary Clinton Rakes in Verizon Cash While Bernie Sanders Supports Company’s Striking Workers
Verizon paid Hillary $225,000 for speech and poured money into Clinton Foundation. Executives give to her campaign
Hillary Clinton, a Wall Street-backed multimillionaire, served for six years on the board of directors of Walmart, the world’s largest company based on sales. She remained silent at a time when the mega-corporation was viciously cracking down on workers’ attempts to unionize.
Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, has been unflinching in his support of the labor movement. Sanders has spoken passionately in support of striking Verizon workers on multiple occasions.
The Hillary Clinton campaign, meanwhile, has received tens of thousands of dollars from Verizon executives and lobbyists.
That’s not all. For a May 2013 speech, the corporation paid Clinton a whopping $225,000 honorarium, according to her tax records.
Verizon has also given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation, which investigative journalist Ken Silverstein has referred to as a “so-called charitable enterprise [that] has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.”
Moreover, the Clinton Foundation has partnered directly with Verizon, which is notorious for its vehement opposition to unions. The corporation is a partner in the Clinton Health Matters Initiative, and said it is “proud to partner with the Clinton Foundation.”
http://www.commondreams.org/views/20...panys-striking
"on the same page" ??
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-14-2016 at 09:38 AM.
Why the Panama Papers Could Catapult Bernie Sanders to the White House
Bernie Sanders saw this coming from a mile away. On October 12, 2011, Sen. Sanders took the Senate floor to denounce the Panama trade pact, shooting down the conventional arguments in favor of the deal.
“Panama’s entire economic output is only $26.7 billion per year, or about two-tenths of one percent of the US economy,” Sanders said at the beginning of his speech. “No one can legitimately claim that approving this free trade agreement will significantly increase American jobs.”
Then, Sanders warned of the widespread corruption that would follow should the pact become official.
“Panama is a world leader when it comes to allowing wealthy Americans and large corporations to evade US taxes by stashing their cash in offshore tax havens.
The Panama free trade agreement will make this bad situation much worse.
Each and every year, the wealthiest people in this country and the largest corporations evade about $100 billion in taxes through abusive and illegal offshore tax havens in Panama and in other countries.”
As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was on the complete opposite side of the issue.
In an official statement issued by the US Department of State on October 13, 2011 (one day after Sanders’ floor address), Clinton congratulated President Obama for passing the trade pact, citing the very same job creation arguments Sen. Sanders shot down a day earlier. Clinton made no mention of Panama’s reputation as a tax haven, and even invoked “working families” in her statement:
“These initiatives are the leading edge of a job-creating trade agenda that will open markets, level the playing field for our businesses and workers, and champion America’s working families in an age of tough global compe ion. They deserve the historic and widespread support they received in Congress tonight. We will continue our work to rebuild an American consensus on trade.”
http://usuncut.com/politics/panama-papers-bernie-sanders-white-house/
Bernie Sanders Wins TIME 100 Reader Poll
http://time.com/4292589/bernie-sande...0-poll-winner/
Bernie Sanders has won the Time Magazine reader poll of who should appear on its annual list of the 100 most influential people in the world -- topping not only Hillary Clinton (he received more than 3 times as many votes as she did), but also President Obama, Pope Francis, Burmese leader Aung San Suu Kyi, Pakistani activist Malala Yousafzai, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, and Leonardo DiCaprio. -- Reich/FB
Just another of the literally 100 (plus) more things than Bernie Hillary supporters have to defend before they can even attempt to attack BernieHillary Clinton Rakes in Verizon Cash While Bernie Sanders Supports Company’s Striking Workers
Verizon paid Hillary $225,000 for speech and poured money into Clinton Foundation. Executives give to her campaign
Hillary Clinton, a Wall Street-backed multimillionaire, served for six years on the board of directors of Walmart, the world’s largest company based on sales. She remained silent at a time when the mega-corporation was viciously cracking down on workers’ attempts to unionize.
Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, has been unflinching in his support of the labor movement. Sanders has spoken passionately in support of striking Verizon workers on multiple occasions.
The Hillary Clinton campaign, meanwhile, has received tens of thousands of dollars from Verizon executives and lobbyists.
That’s not all. For a May 2013 speech, the corporation paid Clinton a whopping $225,000 honorarium, according to her tax records.
Verizon has also given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation, which investigative journalist Ken Silverstein has referred to as a “so-called charitable enterprise [that] has served as a vehicle to launder money and to enrich family friends.”
Moreover, the Clinton Foundation has partnered directly with Verizon, which is notorious for its vehement opposition to unions. The corporation is a partner in the Clinton Health Matters Initiative, and said it is “proud to partner with the Clinton Foundation.”
http://www.commondreams.org/views/20...panys-striking
"on the same page" ??
Is Hillary going to blame gun violence in New York on Vermont in tonight's debate? Did you see the look in her eyes and the tone of her voice when she told everyone Vermont is to blame?
Now she is resorting to fear-mongering. Bernie is head and shoulder better than her.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/14/politi...ore/index.html
Good on Bernie.
He had to. The point was still made though.
But it goes back to what I posted last night that he would have to defend this. It's not the first time one of his surrogates bits more than they can chew. Time to rein them in abit. Vet who gets to speak.
A new Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday shows Bernie Sanders beating Hillary Clinton by one point with registered Democratic voters.
Read more: http://usuncut.com/politics/bernie-s...national-poll/The survey of 1,680 registered voters, 635 of whom identified as Democrats, was conducted between April 9 and April 13. Among all Democrats and Democratic-leaning independent voters, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton by a 47-42 margin, with 11 percent of respondents saying they wouldn’t vote for either candidate. Sanders beats Clinton by a narrow margin of 49-48 among registered Democrats, and he demolishes Clinton by 16 points among self-identified independents. The poll’s margin of error is 2.7 percent.
Among all respondents, 36 percent identify as Democrats, 28 percent affiliate with the Republican Party, and 12 percent listed themselves as independents, with 9 percent leaning toward Democrats, 5 percent toward Republican, and 7 percent favoring a third party. Finally, only 2 percent of those surveyed said they were unsure of their party affiliation.
This latest poll is the third to show Sanders leading Clinton this month. A poll conducted by the Public Religion Research Ins ute and the Atlantic between March 30 and April 3 showed Sanders beating Clinton by one point, along with a McClatchy/Marist poll conducted between March 29 and March 31 that had Sanders up by two points.
Doubtful........but who knows?
^ That's talking about nationally though. There have been a few polls out that show him ahead by 1 or 2 points. Within the margin of error.
Btw, how does this come into play? If someone is leading nationally, what exactly does this do for you in terms of winning the democratic nomination?
The Dem lie is that Bernie is unelectable.
Of course, polls are wonderfully useless as many people refuse to particpate, so recent polls before recent elections have been badly inaccurate.
Maybe Bernie is even MORE electable than is indicated.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-15-2016 at 08:43 AM.
A lot of the mainstream outlets are claiming Shillary won last nights debate.
Not by a ton, but they keep the narrative that she came across as the Skank with a Plan whereas Bernie talks about problems but has not presented workable solutions.
Anyone watch and have a view?
I thought they both had their moments. Overall though I think he did better but did either changed hearts and mind? Nah.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions