Yeah a 67 win team is going to get swept. Something that has never happened before in NBA history.
Yeah a 67 win team is going to get swept. Something that has never happened before in NBA history.
got OP covering all his bases.
it is a possibility, tbh...Spurs offensive troubles in this matchup are pretty alarming.
Bad omen: the last 60+ win team to get swept by another +60 win team was the 1996 Magic (60-22) by 1996 Bulls (72-10)![]()
I thought it'd be GSW's offense to do the trick, not the defense, but here we are.
Bruh, 2001 Spurs were the equivalent of the 2007 Cavs.
Besides, the Duds are more similar to the 2010 Suns than '01 Lakers.
You really need to work on your thread les.
Laker fan troll doing her thing...
Spoken like a true fake fan.
I think it's part of his shtick tbh.
No Sherlock.
No shame in losing to a 73 win team that has pretty much every position a matchup advantage vs you.
No shame at all.
If spurs can get to WCFs and win two games vs worriers. I'll be a happy camper.
The sonics won 64 games and lost in 6 to the bulls. You guys are reaching in the sense that when it comes to nba history no team that has won 64 plus games has ever been swept. I don't see the spurs making that type of history.
Spurs are basically a 70 win team, considering they coasted to end the regular season.
With that kind of dominance in a season, I still wonder if the league has become that top heavy, or the Spurs are just unlucky that they have such a good team and will likely get outmatched by a 6'3" PG who just has too much range.
Getting swept <> getting 2001 Lakers'd
And acts like one in 2016
So Lamarcus Aldridge is going to be taken out by a flagrant 2 before the Spurs meet the Warriors?
lol our #2 option isn't Derek ing Anderson anymore so I think we'll be fine. some of y'all are such weenies![]()
Pop's been keeping the Warriors secret formula bottled all season...I feels it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)