Bathroom Access For Transgender Student Sparks Debate

[Blake]

Your question needed no reply. I already said gender neutral, which means anyone can use it, and gender specific which means that gender can use it. You continuously dismiss people who may feel uncomfortable sharing a bathroom with a transgender. Why does the comfort level of a transgender take precedent over a non-transgender's comfort level?

If you want to be totally fair to all parties who might feel uncomfortable single occupancy bathrooms for all.

You guys are acting like it's equal discomfort.

But yeah, single occupancy bathrooms for all would be fine

[Blake]

it's just a weird double standard that we have to accommodate trans people who feel weirded out, but non trans people who feel weirded are expected to "deal with it" or "get used to it"

i think its also a bit misguided to call this some big civil rights issue, as this has to do with somebody's subjective iden y and not an objective trait like race, sex, etc

Oh so you're in the it's a choice camp.

Noted.

[spurraider21]

Oh so you're in the it's a choice camp.

Noted.

strawman

noted

[Blake]

The women will be the first to complain about gender neutral bathrooms and they'll complain loudly. It won't be due sharing the bathroom with transgenders it will be due to having to use the stall after men and their disgusting bathroom etiquette.

Funny, it's been guys that I've seen complaining first.

Both on this board and in the political arena.

[Blake]

strawman

noted

If it's straw, it's yours. You brought it up being subjective iden y vs objective, not me.

I'm just making a mental note for later

[spurraider21]

If it's straw, it's yours. You brought it up being subjective iden y vs objective, not me.

i never called it a choice, moron

that's what makes it a strawman, you introduced an argument i never made

it is subjective because it's a matter of how the person feels

[Blake]

i never called it a choice, moron

that's what makes it a strawman, you introduced an argument i never made

Then explain what you mean by subjective vs objective, professor

[TheSanityAnnex]

You guys are acting like it's equal discomfort.

But yeah, single occupancy bathrooms for all would be fine

Who are you to judge someone's discomfort?

Remodeling all the bathrooms in the United States for .3% of the population sounds like an excellent use of tax dollars.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Funny, it's been guys that I've seen complaining first.

Both on this board and in the political arena.

Both are dominated by men are you surprised? You still haven't explained why you think it is okay to force a certain group of people to feel uncomfortable to appease another group of people who felt uncomfortable.

[TheSanityAnnex]

This could be a very positive step to see ties on a daily basis. Now that a woman can just go in the men's bathroom because she identifies as a man can she also walk around with no shirt on because she identifies as a man? And if so what would stop women who identify as women but just want to go topless from going topless and just saying they identify as a man? Bring on the ties right Blake?

[Blake]

Who are you to judge someone's discomfort?

Remodeling all the bathrooms in the United States for .3% of the population sounds like an excellent use of tax dollars.

You want to equate the discomfort of looking at a trans to being ridiculed, stared at, harassed, for trying to use the bathroom of the gender they look like, I won't stop you. I'll lolsmh at you tho.

[spurraider21]

Then explain what you mean by subjective vs objective, professor

i'm not a professor, but here's a dictionary definition of subjective. tell me more about how gender iden y isn't a personal feeling

based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.

[Blake]

Which one of you asked for his at the men's room door and then kicked him out

[Blake]

i'm not a professor, but here's a dictionary definition of subjective. tell me more about how gender iden y isn't a personal feeling

based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.

Right, you're saying it's their opinion.

Is it fact that they can be born that way or not? Stop dancing so we can move to next point

[spurraider21]

Right, you're saying it's their opinion.

Is it fact that they can be born that way or not? Stop dancing so we can move to next point

i'm not dancing. i have never even implied the opinion that it's a choice. you're just trying to build a nice big strawman so you can slay it and feel good about yourself

[TheSanityAnnex]

You want to equate the discomfort of looking at a trans to being ridiculed, stared at, harassed, for trying to use the bathroom of the gender they look like, I won't stop you. I'll lolsmh at you tho.

Wait...you think all transgenders look like the sex they identify with? smh

[TheSanityAnnex]

This could be a very positive step to see ties on a daily basis. Now that a woman can just go in the men's bathroom because she identifies as a man can she also walk around with no shirt on because she identifies as a man? And if so what would stop women who identify as women but just want to go topless from going topless and just saying they identify as a man? Bring on the ties right Blake?

Please chime in Blake.

[boutons_deux]

British officials warn travelers about anti-LGBT laws in the US



one of our closest allies feels the need to warn some of its citizens about possibly facing discrimination while visiting the United States. The Washington Postreported yesterday:

The British Foreign Office has released an advisory warning travelers to be aware of controversial new laws in North Carolina and Mississippi before visiting the United States.

The travel advisory update – directed to members of the country’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community – was posted on the Foreign Office’s website Tuesday.

The travel advisory, which is available online here, reminds British travelers, “The US is an extremely diverse society and at udes towards LGBT people differ hugely across the country. LGBT travelers may be affected by legislation passed recently in the states of North Carolina and Mississippi. Before travelling please read our general travel advice for the LGBT community.”

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow

USA giving the worst possible example as the dominant planetary empire.

Thanks, Repugs

[baseline bum]

michael moore is a got

True, but even fat gots can be right some of the time.

[TheSanityAnnex]

British officials warn travelers about anti-LGBT laws in the US

one of our closest allies feels the need to warn some of its citizens about possibly facing discrimination while visiting the United States. The Washington Postreported yesterday:

The British Foreign Office has released an advisory warning travelers to be aware of controversial new laws in North Carolina and Mississippi before visiting the United States.

The travel advisory update – directed to members of the country’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community – was posted on the Foreign Office’s website Tuesday.

The travel advisory, which is available online here, reminds British travelers, “The US is an extremely diverse society and at udes towards LGBT people differ hugely across the country. LGBT travelers may be affected by legislation passed recently in the states of North Carolina and Mississippi. Before travelling please read our general travel advice for the LGBT community.”

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow

USA giving the worst possible example as the dominant planetary empire.

Thanks, Repugs

The LGBT Brits must be so heart broken they won't be able to take a piss where they want in two states they'd never visit.

[Blake]

i'm not dancing. i have never even implied the opinion that it's a choice. you're just trying to build a nice big strawman so you can slay it and feel good about yourself

Yeah, saying it's subjective is implying choice, but ok, whatever.
Will leave it there until you're ready to answer and move to the next point.

[Blake]

Wait...you think all transgenders look like the sex they identify with? smh

Of course not. But I posted a picture of one that looks really manly but forced to use the womens restroom because of your discomfort. So there's that.

[Big Dog]

Just have unisex restrooms already. people complain and whine about trivial . There are more things going on in the country and in the world to be focused on issues like this.

At the white knighting by our resident cuck sjw though, lolsmh spending hours on end on a ing basketball forum arguing transgender politics and pimping a leftist agenda

[Blake]

This could be a very positive step to see ties on a daily basis. Now that a woman can just go in the men's bathroom because she identifies as a man can she also walk around with no shirt on because she identifies as a man? And if so what would stop women who identify as women but just want to go topless from going topless and just saying they identify as a man? Bring on the ties right Blake?

Please chime in Blake.

Fine with me. Does it make you uncomfortable?

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...cities+topless

[TheSanityAnnex]

Fine with me. Does it make you uncomfortable?

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...cities+topless

Why would something I said would be positive make me uncomfortable? I don't have kids and ties are ties. The outcome would be hilarious. Gay men offended, mothers offended for their children, Muslim men offended and not able to control themselves even more etc. The left will have pit its special snowflake groups against each other. Personally, I look forward to it.