These guys just don't get it......
"Clinton targets young voters with new fundraising group" -Join "for as low as $250" LOL!
Wonder what one would get for their lowly $250?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKCN0XI2TBU.S. Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton launched a bid on Thursday to draw young voters and small donors to her campaign, targeting the strengths of her rival, Bernie Sanders, as she looks ahead to the general election.
Dubbed "for45" - for Clinton as the 45th president of the United States - the group will offer associate level membership for as low as $250, according to an invitation seen by Reuters for an April 25 Philadelphia event.
The group includes two other tiers, according to an information sheet seen by a "member" level with minimum fundraising of $2,500 and an "advisor" level for raising at least $10,000.
Wonder what kind of access 250 will get you?
Here's a pretty girl trashing Hillary's establishment cred, her neoconnery, her neoliberalism, her war mongering, and her corruption via her foundation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV_PLCC6jeI
Hilariously, she's still somewhat better than any Repug Pres backed by a Repug SCOTUS and Repug Congress. Although Hillary is mostly a Repug and not to close to the center.
It's funny hearing you talk about Hillary when you used to bend over backward (or maybe forward) to defend Bill on this forum.
Above average looking chick who looks and sounds like part of the bitter mostly white Faux News female brigade.
Not that I am defending Shillary, I'm not.
Dude was defeding her the other day about the Benghazi and email .It's funny hearing you talk about Hillary when you used to bend over backward (or maybe forward) to defend Bill on this forum.
There's nothing funny about it. We have to choose between two ty candidates (Hillary and the GOP nominee) in the general election. The only question is do we young voters (AKA Bernie supporters) vote Trump to send our party a message that we're not accepting this bull . If the GOP nominee is Cruz, then I simply won't vote.
meh. i have no problem with a defense attorney being a defense attorney.
in fact, if a lawyer didnt do her best job for her client based on political beliefs, then thats a ty ing attorney who should be disbarred. being a defense attorney in a rape case doesn't mean you support rape. that's just dumb
That was your entire takeaway from the video?
a majority of that video seemed to be scolding hillary for being a lawyer
the stuff about bill is legit tho
Crooked Hillary, tbh
Is that really sticking? Not a lot of people picking it up imo.
Not that we didn't already know she was crooked. 99% of politicians are.
It's sticking, but he hasn't had a chance to really spread it. He had lyin' ted for a while, it only caught fire after that colorado debacle.
I hate election season. I simply hate voting for the most viable 2nd worse candidate so the worst has a lesser change of screwing us.
on the messenger, but you have nothing to say about her unoriginal, well-known message.
I was proud to vote for Obama in 2008 (and don't regret it). Kerry was good enough for me. But Hillary sucks.
When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.
Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.
Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.
Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
Many younger votes will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours. Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House.
Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.
Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the #$%$ eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle were: - She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones. - She refused to release the Whitewater do ents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. - After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.
Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.
Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.
After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.
What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type of low-life mess?
Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next.
But to her loyal fans (supporters) - I guess in her own words “what difference does it make?”
Hey Mitch, so much for using crooked.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donal...ry?id=38685355
Hard to call someone crooked when you're on the same boat.
Hey Mitch, so much for using crooked.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donal...ry?id=38685355
Hard to call someone crooked when you're on the same boat.
Nobody is claiming trump isn't crooked tho, he is a businessman. difference is he's a crooked businessman, hillary is a crooked politician
And the difference is?
Nobody is claiming trump isn't crooked tho, he is a businessman. difference is he's a crooked businessman, hillary is a crooked politician
That's like saying I'm a thief, but I only rob people that have it coming.
Difference is that you have to really spin the trump university thing since even the prosecurtor decided to drop out of the case, but there's nothing to spin about hillarys emails, benghazi, super pacs, etcAnd the difference is?
That's like saying I'm a thief, but I only rob people that have it coming.
Everything is spinnable.
If he has to go testify, how is that overlooked? LOL
My point is that you don't have to spin hillary's , just say it straight up and people will question her.
If he has to testify he will just end up clearing his name again, tbh. rich people don't get found guilty over little things like fraud or sending classified emails over public channels
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
