Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 58
  1. #26
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    26,183
    Yeah I didn't see this show up on Realclear. They usually agregate all polls. Somehow this one's missing.

    Did they just phoned republicans or something?
    They didn't push leaners, hence 38/38

  2. #27
    Believe. Dirk Oneanddoneski's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    1,110
    . I wouldn't be surprised if there's a low turnout.
    .
    Maybe for the dems


    With his five blowout wins Tuesday night, Donald Trump has passed Mitt Romney’s popular vote total from four years ago and is on a trajectory that could land him more Republican votes than any presidential candidate in modern history – by a lot.
    Trump surged to more than 10 million votes, according to totals that include Tuesday’s preliminary results across the Northeast. That’s already about 250,000 more than Romney earned in the entire 2012 primary season and 153,000 more than John McCain earned in 2008.


    Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/twelve...#ixzz47Azdf4yY
    Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    20,700
    A few days before the 2012 election, Rasmussen guaranteed a Bishop Gekko win in a blowout.
    lol going after Scott Rasmussen because you don't like the results of this poll... ing idiot!

  4. #29
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    6,573
    Meaningless until a debate or two is had, tbh

  5. #30
    Grab 'em by the pussy Splits's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    26,183

  6. #31
    Believe.
    My Team
    Oklahoma City Thunder
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    520
    Trump will narrowly win the White House and when he does it will be some ery at a glorious level.

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    Meaningless until a debate or two is had, tbh
    Meaningless until 1-2 months of the general elections.

    It's hard to imagine Trump is somehow going to morph into a know it all by then. He'll just continue his insults, no details on policy and so on imo.

  8. #33
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,150
    I don't think a socialist can get elected president in this nation. As soon as barrages of tv ads start appearing with that word he's ed in a general election.
    It's starts with educating the American people about what socialism actually is -- at least Bernie's brand of "democratic socialism". That word used to be a bad word even within the democratic party but not so much anymore. The people who voted for Bernie were not the fringe and most of them knew exactly what they were voting for. Things are changing.

  9. #34
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    6,573
    Meaningless until 1-2 months of the general elections.

    It's hard to imagine Trump is somehow going to morph into a know it all by then. He'll just continue his insults, no details on policy and so on imo.
    Debates seem to do the most for the end-results, tbh. Gore lost because he was a jackass to Bush in the debates

  10. #35
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Pretty much. LOL when people make fun of the Republicans and their quest for ideological purity and then say they're Bernie or bust.
    ideological purity is only right if we're the ones pursuing it

  11. #36
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    It's starts with educating the American people about what socialism actually is -- at least Bernie's brand of "democratic socialism". That word used to be a bad word even within the democratic party but not so much anymore. The people who voted for Bernie were not the fringe and most of them knew exactly what they were voting for. Things are changing.
    The young population think Che Guevara is/was cool.

    They dont know .

    They may not be a fringe anymore but they also disregard most of the bad connotations of something that is viewed negatively and think its just so cool.

  12. #37
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    I don't think a socialist can get elected president in this nation. As soon as barrages of tv ads start appearing with that word he's ed in a general election.
    You stupid s always, ignorantly, slanderously repeat that Bernie's socialism as Marxist socialism, communism

    which of his items are text-book classic socialism, and esp Marxist socialism?

    https://berniesanders.com/issues/ ???

    Bernie is a social democrat, where the govt and society are "of the people, by the people, for the people", instead of the US's current "of the capitalists, by the capitalists, for the capitalists" and of course the capitalists are protected by the militarized NatSec/police state.

    Capitalism is a great system ... for capitalists. As the ed-up US show now, it capitalism FAILS for, SCREWS, impoverishes non-capitalists.



  13. #38
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    You stupid s always, ignorantly, slanderously repeat that Bernie's socialism as Marxist socialism, communism

    which of his items are text-book classic socialism, and esp Marxist socialism?

    https://berniesanders.com/issues/ ???

    Bernie is a social democrat, where the govt and society are "of the people, by the people, for the people", instead of the US's current "of the capitalists, by the capitalists, for the capitalists" and of course the capitalists are protected by the militarized NatSec/police state.

    Capitalism is a great system ... for capitalists. As the ed-up US show now, it capitalism FAILS for, SCREWS, impoverishes non-capitalists.


    When the did I call him a communist you ing got?

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Labels aside, if my money is gonna be taken from me and redistributed, what incentive is there for me to risk investing, opening a business, inventing anything, excelling at anything if it doesn't profit me? I might as well do nothing, and I won't be much worse off than someone who knocks themselves out trying to get ahead. I know this is a simplistic example, but as basketball fans, how do we think that these fantastic players who excel at certain skills, perform at a high level and command such attention/excitement shouldn't get paid accordingly and/or then taxed at some absurd rate?

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    When the did I call him a communist you ing got?
    you ing got, what's your definition of socialism, if not Marxist socialism, which how all idiots in the USA consider "socialism"? you know, USSR, Iron Curtain, Lenin, etc, etc.

  16. #41
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    you ing got, what's your definition of socialism, if not Marxist socialism, which how all idiots in the USA consider "socialism"? you know, USSR, Iron Curtain, Lenin, etc, etc.
    Go your mother

  17. #42
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    I'm voting for Trump. Hillary is a joke.
    Trump is hilarious, his con job is WINNING! , exposing the low-wage, low-info, low-education assholes, his base, as gullible ignoramuses.

  18. #43
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,881
    Labels aside, if my money is gonna be taken from me and redistributed, what incentive is there for me to risk investing, opening a business, inventing anything, excelling at anything if it doesn't profit me? I might as well do nothing, and I won't be much worse off than someone who knocks themselves out trying to get ahead. I know this is a simplistic example, but as basketball fans, how do we think that these fantastic players who excel at certain skills, perform at a high level and command such attention/excitement shouldn't get paid accordingly and/or then taxed at some absurd rate?
    Basketball is a bad example, it's not even close to a free market. In a free market LeBron would be making $50 million a year and the Knicks, Lakers, and Clippers would buy up all the talent while small market teams like the Spurs, Jazz, Thunder, and Pelicans would probably fold because no one would care about a league where most teams got to be the Washington Generals in perpetuity.

  19. #44
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "if my money is gonna be taken from me and redistributed"

    BigCorp and BigFinance are already doing it to you. What's your problem?



  20. #45
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Basketball is a bad example, it's not even close to a free market. In a free market LeBron would be making $50 million a year and the Knicks, Lakers, and Clippers would buy up all the talent while small market teams like the Spurs, Jazz, Thunder, and Pelicans would probably fold.
    I did say it's a simplistic example. I'm thinking more Danny Green type player - someone who has a limited period to earn his money for the rest of his life. His $10+million would have a tax rate of about 70% under Bernie's plan ($2-10 million at 66% iirc). Lebron gets most of his via endorsements and (like MJ) will continue to a long time after his career is over.

  21. #46
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    Basketball is a bad example, it's not even close to a free market. In a free market LeBron would be making $50 million a year and the Knicks, Lakers, and Clippers would buy up all the talent while small market teams like the Spurs, Jazz, Thunder, and Pelicans would probably fold because no one would care about a league where most teams got to be the Washington Generals in perpetuity.
    Truth nukes

    Can you imagine a salary cap in the real world? that would basically be communism.

    Actually good ol Bernie Sanders is trying to implement a Soft salary cap. Which would make the world a fair place. But of course Bernie has no chance vs the corporations.

  22. #47
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "Can you imagine a salary cap in the real world? that would basically be communism."

    New Rules Curbing Wall Street Pay Proposed

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/new-rule...ced-1461247600

  23. #48
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Most NBA players are "like" Danny Green - limited time to earn money. Lebron is the exception.

  24. #49
    The Wemby Assembly z0sa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    15,772
    Most NBA players are "like" Danny Green - limited time to earn money. Lebron is the exception.
    limited time to earn more at the veteran's minimum in one year after taxes than the entire median household earns in 10 -15 years... oh how sad we are for these ball players and their limited prospects

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    limited time to earn more at the veteran's minimum in one year after taxes than the entire median household earns in 10 -15 years... oh how sad we are for these ball players and their limited prospects
    What do you think they should earn? Don't you think that someone with special talent/skill should earn more than the median household? in 5-10 years then? in < 5 years? What specifically and who should decide that? The basketball players shouldn't be allowed to form their union? to negotiate their salaries?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •