Way to go Austin...

[johnsmith]

If there's already a thread about this, I apologize. What do you guys think of the people of Austin and their collective decision to drive Uber and Lyft out of town? I know it's those companies choice to leave but they did deliver the ultimatum, so everyone knew it could potentially happen.

I for one am angry as and don't understand why we thought we needed to over regulate such a simple concept. everyone!

[boutons_deux]

Uber is the bully (We Don't Need No Steenkin' Regulations) while Lyft is content to ride Uber's wake.

Uber and Lyft will be back in Austin, there will be fewer drivers due to the regulatory hassles, which means the drivers who do go through the fingerprinting, whatever will be very happily busy as .

Austin was already a vastly superior market for rideshare drivers compared to podunk SA's rideshare market.

The real problem was the puny turnout by Uber and Lyft riders, was just about as ridiculous a turnout as SA muni elections.

Uber Preparing to Leave Houston if City Keeps Existing Rules


https://www.texastribune.org/2016/04...ting-regulati/

[pgardn]

If there's already a thread about this, I apologize. What do you guys think of the people of Austin and their collective decision to drive Uber and Lyft out of town? I know it's those companies choice to leave but they did deliver the ultimatum, so everyone knew it could potentially happen.

I for one am angry as and don't understand why we thought we needed to over regulate such a simple concept. everyone!

The people's choice. Welcome to a democracy where the people decided they wanted qualified drivers. They fingerprint so many public servants now. Ya think teachers need to be fingerprinted? The void will eventually be filled. As a frequent user of both Uber and Lyft due to travel I personally don't care. But I know a lot of women in Austin who do.

[Spurminator]

More overreach disguised as concern for the public's safety against an imaginary boogeyman, IMO.

[Pelicans78]

Doctors have to be fingerprinted, but I do worry about over-regulation continuing to stagnant the economy.

[boutons_deux]

Doctors have to be fingerprinted, but I do worry about over-regulation continuing to stagnant the economy.

bull , there aren't enough regulations, and the ones in place aren't enforced.

the economy is stagnant, 40M+ on public assistance, because BigCorp/1% have sucked $Ts out of circulation into the BigFinance casino, leaving consumers with much less to spend in the 70% consumer economy.

"over regulation" is one the HUGE PROPAGANDA LIES from the VRWC that wants to be free of all regs so they rape, pillage, loot people and planet "legally"

[boutons_deux]

btw, nearly all the comments in the uber drivers forum, Austin section, are against Uber and for Austin. Uber gets no sympathy and solidarity from the drivers.

[Chinook]

More overreach disguised as concern for the public's safety against an imaginary boogeyman, IMO.

Um, I wouldn't peg you for being against government regulation of business quality. Personally, I think it's a great idea to regulate this more, especially in a huge (physically) city that has poor public transportation and an active social scene. In fact, I'm surprised they don't have some type of public version of this. Seems like a way to accomplish everyone's goals (except the companies) until they can get something permanent worked out. That's even more true if Uber and Lyft keep to their pledge to stay out of the city. If Austin showed a public option is viable, then they could set a huge precedent.

[Spurminator]

Um, I wouldn't peg you for being against government regulation of business quality. Personally, I think it's a great idea to regulate this more, especially in a huge (physically) city that has poor public transportation and an active social scene. In fact, I'm surprised they don't have some type of public version of this. Seems like a way to accomplish everyone's goals (except the companies) until they can get something permanent worked out. That's even more true if Uber and Lyft keep to their pledge to stay out of the city. If Austin showed a public option is viable, then they could set a huge precedent.

I just think the business quality aspect is built into the functionality. Drivers are reviewed and rated. I'd welcome a public option as well, if it can compete.

[Winehole23]

The people's choice. Welcome to a democracy where the people decided they wanted qualified drivers. They fingerprint so many public servants now. Ya think teachers need to be fingerprinted? The void will eventually be filled. As a frequent user of both Uber and Lyft due to travel I personally don't care. But I know a lot of women in Austin who do.

spent $8-10M and lost. voters didn't want em to write their own rules.

[Winehole23]

good riddance to smelly garbage. opportunity for someone else.

[Winehole23]

hard to believe they'll bail on Austin more than temporarily

[boutons_deux]

hard to believe they'll bail on Austin more than temporarily

See my link above. Uber has beens working under Houston's strict rules, but is now threatening to leave.

I agree that Uber and Lyft, both bother to have offices in Austin, will not stay out of such an ideal (youngish, techy, educated, relatively high per capita income) and lucrative market, but now that the Austin govt has won, Austin govt ain't gonna back down. Houston didn't.

If will take more than a few TX cities (out of the 100s, or 1000s of other permissive cities) kicking them out for Uber and Lyft to back down.

The challenge for Lyft/Uber from TX cities is to prevent other cities from imposing the same restrictions.

"Only two cities require fingerprint checks for ride-hailing drivers -- Houston and New York City -- but there’s a push to do so in others, including Atlanta, Boston, Los Angeles and San Francisco."

http://www.governing.com/topics/publ...rprinting.html

Assuming cities start imposed fingerprinting, FBI b/g checks, I see that as a big plus for the drivers who pass the b/g checks.

Fewer drivers, and some cities are over-supplied, means less dead time and more rides. For riders, it will probably mean longer wait times, which ruthless Uber may try to compensate for by reducing rates even further, already way way below taxi rates, knocking back drivers' income.

some charts, and how ruthlessly Uber has screwed drivers by reducing fares, forcing Lyft to follow:

"Fernando Chiara, a 26-year-old working full time in the insurance industry in Los Angeles, began driving nights and weekends for Uber to make extra cash in the summer of 2013. At the time, he said, he regularly made $700 to $900 a week, before expenses, working 20 to 30 hours.

“It was great; there were not a lot of fares, but the prices were a lot higher, and that compensated,” said Chiara, who gave rides in his Toyota RAV4. As Uber has done in many cities, it then began to lower fares and the rate drivers earn per mile.

“A fare that used to be 40 bucks started to be 30 bucks, then 28 bucks and 25 bucks,” he said.

“Now you can do the same fare in 15 to 16 dollars. For me, it’s not worth it for that.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...king%E2%80%8B/

Can't find it now, but one analyst figured that Uber was making about $0.19/ride in USA.

[mrsmaalox]

spent $8-10M and lost. voters didn't want em to write their own rules.

I wonder how much the cab drivers spent to win? And those pesky tow truck operators whose bread and butter are the folks Uber/Lyft are separating from their vehicles?

[tlongII]

I wonder how much the cab drivers spent to win? And those pesky tow truck operators whose bread and butter are the folks Uber/Lyft are separating from their vehicles?

Bingo. Cab companies can't stand Uber/Lyft. The fact is Uber/Lyft serves a niche that cabs don't.

[boutons_deux]

Bingo. Cab companies can't stand Uber/Lyft. The fact is Uber/Lyft serves a niche that cabs don't.

The turnout was very low. The niche is riders who want to pay 50% or less of what taxis charge. Pretty big niche.

Price-leader Uber's fares are so low they easily beat taxis, so their screw-the-drivers low-fare pricing strategy is to create and sustain new riders, while keeping Lyft's income down (lyft had to cut their fares by 20% in early April to compete).

[johnsmith]

I don't care the politics, I don't care about the government, I don't care about Uber's feelings. I just know that the only "winner" in this is the 475 taxi's that currently serve a city of a million ing people....there's not enough ing cabs.

I also care that I no longer will be able to use Uber in Austin, which I absolutely loved using.

No when the DUI numbers go up, as well as drinking related vehicle crashes increase, all those that voted for this thing can celebrate that they helped kill someone!

[boutons_deux]

I don't care the politics, I don't care about the government, I don't care about Uber's feelings. I just know that the only "winner" in this is the 475 taxi's that currently serve a city of a million ing people....there's not enough ing cabs.

I also care that I no longer will be able to use Uber in Austin, which I absolutely loved using.

No when the DUI numbers go up, as well as drinking related vehicle crashes increase, all those that voted for this thing can celebrate that they helped kill someone!

Have DUI incidents declined in Austin since Uber + Lyft arrived? and they were identified as contributing?

only 55K voters in Prop 1 vote, in a city of 900K, probably less than a 10% turnout.

[tlongII]

The turnout was very low. The niche is riders who want to pay 50% or less of what taxis charge. Pretty big niche.

Price-leader Uber's fares are so low they easily beat taxis, so their screw-the-drivers low-fare pricing strategy is to create and sustain new riders, while keeping Lyft's income down (lyft had to cut their fares by 20% in early April to compete).

Uber/Lyft rates vary with demand. As demand increases, so do their rates. The niche they fill is related to rapid response time.

[boutons_deux]

Uber/Lyft rates vary with demand. As demand increases, so do their rates. The niche they fill is related to rapid response time.

Uber surges have been greatly reduced. Surge fares up to 9x non-surge fares REALLY pissed off riders. My friend in Austin rarely see surge zones above 2x.

The consensus among drivers is that you don't go chasing into a surge zone, because when, or before, you get there
a) the surge zone is gone or
b) you don't get a rider.

The almost constant surge zone in SA in the east side at night, and that's for only a surge rate of 2x or less. Uber tries to lure drivers into a high crime area at night. Drivers mostly refuse.

[boutons_deux]

My Austin rideshare friend just emailed me that his investigation using Uber rider app and Lyft in rider mode to move around his pickup points outside of Austin city limits shows an abundance of uber and lift drivers outside of Austin.

[boutons_deux]

Credit: Austin Monitor

[InRareForm]

ride your bike

[Spurminator]

No when the DUI numbers go up, as well as drinking related vehicle crashes increase, all those that voted for this thing can celebrate that they helped kill someone!

Good point. Is public safety really better served by the reduction of easy options for getting home without driving?

[boutons_deux]

Good point. Is public safety really better served by the reduction of easy options for getting home without driving?

is public safety increased by rideshare?

are drunk people driving themselves home because taxis are too expensive, but rideshare isn't?

The bigger question is why TX and US alcohol limits are so high compared to other countries where BigAlcohol doesn't make the law.