Hillary's emails

[TheSanityAnnex]

Clinton aide Cheryl Mills leaves FBI interview briefly after being asked about emails

Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off-limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.
Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said.


Investigators consider Mills — who served as chief of staff while Clinton was secretary of state — to be a cooperative witness. But the episode demonstrates some of the tension surrounding the criminal probe into possible mishandling of classified information involving the leading Democratic presidential candidate. In the coming weeks, prosecutors and FBI agents hope to be able to interview Clinton herself as they work to bring the case to a close.

The incident was described to The Washington Post by several people, including U.S. law enforcement officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing and those involved could face professional consequences for discussing it publicly.


It is not completely unknown for FBI agents and prosecutors to diverge on interview tactics and approach, and the people familiar with the matter said Mills answered investigators’ questions. Mills and her lawyer, Beth Wilkinson, also asked for breaks more than once to confer, the people said.


The questions that were considered off-limits had to do with the procedure used to produce emails to the State Department so they could possibly be released publicly, the people said. Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...6261&tid=ss_tw

[rmt]

So what state is this in? And is the governor a republican or democrat?

[CosmicCowboy]

One thing to keep in mind is that they never ask a question that they don't already have the answer to.

[Mitch]

The GOP started out in the hole, now the DNC let themselves slide into one.

[Reck]

The GOP started out in the hole, now the DNC let themselves slide into one.

By doing what? Are you talking about the emails? You know this is a dead end, right? Has been for a long time.

[CosmicCowboy]

You are like the re ed version of that ing re boutons. No offense to sucker cowboy who has equally qualified number of missing chromosomes. Also an atta girl to rmt for still being the stupidest person in the world.

It is truly amazing you can dress yourselves. Thank God for granimals, as long as you mutants remember the zebras go with zebras.

The people that these morons that think for you told you to put in charge just spent the past 6 years wastefully spending millions of your tax dollars trying to nail corrupt Hillary.

We will first acknowledge what hypocritical pieces of you are for throwing temper tantrums about the government spending money feeding and helping people in need, which makes you all truly awful ty people. Which of course you are.

But all of that dog and pony stuff, which of course was done in lieu of the actual jobs they were supposedly elected for, came up with nothing. So rather than admit defeat, even though a few have let it slip that they used your stupidity to perform this ing wasteful stunt, the that tells you all what to think and parrot doubles down with more claims they won't ever finish proving.

You ing mogoloids are the epitome of the "shiny object" form of journalism that has helped to destroy this country. I'd say you pieces of should be ashamed, but you have to be a thinking being for that.

off loser. You are the throwing monkey of the forum.

[tlongII]

Strong. Did you get that from hannity or rush? You obviously have no original thoughts or opinions of your own because you are so ing stupid, and need to be spoon fed your "ideas" by the folks that depend on you being a ing mongoloid so they can use you to steal oxygen from thinking people.

The best thing you could do for the planet right now is to stop breathing. It would be your first positive contribution to society ever. It is way past the time for you stop ruining the planet with your existence.

[Reck]

bonerrific owning heads.

[CosmicCowboy]

bonerrific owning heads.

Two monkeys in love.

[Reck]

Two monkeys in love.

I dont even know the guy. I just thought his long ranting post was funny as .

[mrsmaalox]

[TheSanityAnnex]

By doing what? Are you talking about the emails? You know this is a dead end, right? Has been for a long time.

Such a dead end that the FBI is doing two separate investigations

[TheSanityAnnex]

You are like the re ed version of that ing re boutons. No offense to sucker cowboy who has equally qualified number of missing chromosomes. Also an atta girl to rmt for still being the stupidest person in the world.

It is truly amazing you can dress yourselves. Thank God for granimals, as long as you mutants remember the zebras go with zebras.

The people that these morons that think for you told you to put in charge just spent the past 6 years wastefully spending millions of your tax dollars trying to nail corrupt Hillary.

We will first acknowledge what hypocritical pieces of you are for throwing temper tantrums about the government spending money feeding and helping people in need, which makes you all truly awful ty people. Which of course you are.

But all of that dog and pony stuff, which of course was done in lieu of the actual jobs they were supposedly elected for, came up with nothing. So rather than admit defeat, even though a few have let it slip that they used your stupidity to perform this ing wasteful stunt, the that tells you all what to think and parrot doubles down with more claims they won't ever finish proving.

You ing mogoloids are the epitome of the "shiny object" form of journalism that has helped to destroy this country. I'd say you pieces of should be ashamed, but you have to be a thinking being for that.

Solid rant bro, not sure why you brought up Republicans though as this investigation is being done by Obama's DOJ and FBI.

[Reck]

Such a dead end that the FBI is doing two separate investigations

Did you get that off Breitbart?

Get me a link where there is a second investigation on her. And how come this hasn't been mentioned by anyone?

This sounds more like a witch hunt and fantasy from you nut cases out there that want to see her badly in chains.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Did you get that off Breitbart?

Get me a link where there is a second investigation on her. And how come this hasn't been mentioned by anyone?

This sounds more like a witch hunt and fantasy from you nut cases out there that want to see her badly in chains.

Are you ing serious? Utterly stupid questions like this are why sometimes I think you are trolling. The classified emails and her receiving illegal donations through her foundation are separate investigations, both being done by the FBI.

[Reck]

Are you ing serious? Utterly stupid questions like this are why sometimes I think you are trolling. The classified emails and her receiving illegal donations through her foundation are separate investigations, both being done by the FBI.

So no links then.

Also answer the question.

[TheSanityAnnex]

So no links then.

Also answer the question.

Tired of holding your hand TBH. You've already been given the link, and I actually gave you one showing three ongoing investigations, but now down to two since the FBI told the State Department to halt theirs.
Do you think the classified emails sent/received over a non-secure server and the illegal contributions to her foundation are an investigation one in the same?

[Reck]

Tired of holding your hand TBH. You've already been given the link, and I actually gave you one showing three ongoing investigations, but now down to two since the FBI told the State Department to halt theirs.
Do you think the classified emails sent/received over a non-secure server and the illegal contributions to her foundation are an investigation one in the same?

Oh my. Now we're up to 3 separate investigation. Poor lady cant catch a break.

[Reck]

Tired of holding your hand TBH. You've already been given the link, and I actually gave you one showing three ongoing investigations, but now down to two since the FBI told the State Department to halt theirs.
Do you think the classified emails sent/received over a non-secure server and the illegal contributions to her foundation are an investigation one in the same?

OK, I googled..

"It is also not clear who is the “target” of the grand jury. In a Monday interview with Fox News, Clinton insisted she was not a target of the Justice Department or of a grand jury. Clinton, however, could be the “subject” of an investigation, but not a target.

A “target” is when a prosecutor or a grand jury has substantial evidence to link a person to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a defendant. While a “subject” of an investigation is a person whose conduct is within the scope of a grand jury’s investigation but may not have committed a crime."

"Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer, also said that empaneling a grand jury does not mean guilt.
“Even if a grand jury is impaneled, it doesn’t mean culpability,” Zaid told TheDCNF."

"The Justice Department cautions that convening a grand jury in itself is not the equivalent of an indictment."

http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/09/cl...al-corruption/

Sooo they dont even know who the target is? Umm ok, you're just choosing to believe she's the target. Big difference there.

[TheSanityAnnex]

OK, I googled..

"It is also not clear who is the “target” of the grand jury. In a Monday interview with Fox News, Clinton insisted she was not a target of the Justice Department or of a grand jury. Clinton, however, could be the “subject” of an investigation, but not a target.

A “target” is when a prosecutor or a grand jury has substantial evidence to link a person to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a defendant. While a “subject” of an investigation is a person whose conduct is within the scope of a grand jury’s investigation but may not have committed a crime."

"Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer, also said that empaneling a grand jury does not mean guilt.
“Even if a grand jury is impaneled, it doesn’t mean culpability,” Zaid told TheDCNF."

"The Justice Department cautions that convening a grand jury in itself is not the equivalent of an indictment."

http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/09/cl...al-corruption/

Sooo they dont even know who the target is? Umm ok, you're just choosing to believe she's the target. Big difference there.

Thank you for an article from March

Do you think the classified emails sent/received over a non-secure server and the illegal contributions to her foundation are an investigation one in the same?

[Reck]

Thank you for an article from March

Do you think the classified emails sent/received over a non-secure server and the illegal contributions to her foundation are an investigation one in the same?

I think that you are looking too much into nothing.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I think that you are looking too much into nothing.

Looking too much into nothing does not produce a 9+ month investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. If there was nothing it would have been dead on arrival for the FBI. This isn't like the Benghazi bull that can be dragged out for years by congress for political reasons. Pull your head out of your ass.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I think that you are looking too much into nothing.

Reck

Hillary’s Latest Scandal: She And Bill Siphoned $100 Mil From Mideast Leaders


candal: A new investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton took in at least $100 million from Middle East leaders. Can such a financially and ethically compromised candidate truly function as our nation’s leader?The investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation has uncovered a disturbing pattern of the Clintons’ raising money for the Clinton Foundation from regimes that have checkered records on human rights and that aren’t always operating in the best interests of the U.S. By the way, the $100 million we mentioned above doesn’t appear to include another $30 million given to the Clintons by two Mideast-based foundations and four billionaire Saudis.
All told, it’s a lot of money.
“These regimes are buying access,” Patrick Poole, a national security analyst who regularly writes for PJ Media, told the DCNF. “You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE (United Arab Emirates). There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension.”
Well, maybe not, given that Clinton, during her four-year tenure as secretary of state, used a clearly illegal private email server which is now under investigation by the FBI. Her open e-mail system likely was hacked by Chinese, Russian and perhaps other spy agencies, say cyberespionage experts. Such negligence would seem to disqualify her from ever holding a sensitive foreign policy post in the government again.
Meanwhile, former U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova told the Caller that he believes the FBI has launched a second, possibly more serious investigation into possible political corruption involving the Clinton Foundation. This is potentially explosive, given that the Clintons seem to have run their charity in a way that lines their own pockets.
The question is an open one: Did the oil-rich Mideast nations give lavishly to the Clinton Foundation in an effort to influence future U.S. policy? And what about Bill Clinton’s business partnership with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Dubai’s authoritarian ruler, from 2003 to 2008? Clinton took away some $15 million in “guaranteed payments” from the deal, his tax records show.
A picture of extraordinary greed is emerging from both Clintons in the years after they hold the highest posts in the U.S. government.
In just the past three years, after her stint as the nation’s top diplomat, Hillary Clinton spoke to dozens of deep-pocket firms on Wall Street, typically charging $250,000 a pop to hear her wit and wisdom — despite her bitter condemnations of Wall Street during her campaign.
All told, she took in an estimated $22 million from these speeches — an extraordinary amount, given the growing consensus among foreign-policy thinkers that Clinton was one of the worst secretaries of state ever.
So why would Arab potentates and Wall Street magnates alike pony up so much money for the Clintons? Is it because they believe so strongly in the philanthropic mission of the Clinton Family Foundation? Or is it that they hoped to have influence on a future Hillary Clinton presidency, which would of course feature First Gentleman Bill Clinton?
Remember, a Hillary Clinton presidency once looked like a sure thing. Now, given the growing possibility that she could be charged for criminal negligence for putting secret material on a private server, or perhaps even be charged with corruption, Clinton has far more serious problems than just getting elected. Her biggest problem may be staying out of prison.

http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hillarys-latest-scandal-she-and-bill-siphoned-100-mil-from-persian-gulf-leaders/


http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/11/ex...y-100-million/

[Warlord23]

Hillary is as corrupt as you're gullible, TSA. This article offers zero new evidence, and posits several "open questions". Did the Clintons use their influence to get money? Of course they did ... Just like 90% of current or former politicians. Did the Saudis back Bush's businesses because they though he was a misunderstood Warren Buffet? Did Israeli PACs bankroll Chuck Schumer and Tom Cotton because they felt they were doing a great job of representing their states in the Senate?

Welcome to American politics, where bribery is legal and unchecked. Do you really think it takes a billion dollars per candidate to run an election campaign?

Also, an "investigation" by the "Daily Caller News Foundation"? What's next, the Breitbart fact checking ins ute? The Hannity centre for fairness in reporting?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Hillary is as corrupt as you're gullible, TSA. This article offers zero new evidence, and posits several "open questions". Did the Clintons use their influence to get money? Of course they did ... Just like 90% of current or former politicians. Did the Saudis back Bush's businesses because they though he was a misunderstood Warren Buffet? Did Israeli PACs bankroll Chuck Schumer and Tom Cotton because they felt they were doing a great job of representing their states in the Senate?

Welcome to American politics, where bribery is legal and unchecked. Do you really think it takes a billion dollars per candidate to run an election campaign?

Also, an "investigation" by the "Daily Caller News Foundation"? What's next, the Breitbart fact checking ins ute? The Hannity centre for fairness in reporting?

You ruined my Reck setup thanks a lot pal