Reply With Quote
You stumped me with the word 'realistic' Is that possible with Trade options for Tony?
Everyone wants to trade Tony..dump his guaranteed money..send him to Milwaukee?? really? Give me your best Trade Tony Option....what you got? Remember it's gotta be realistic...
You stumped me with the word 'realistic' Is that possible with Trade options for Tony?
He is not getting traded, nor should he be. He has played, and earned the right to finish his career in this uniform.
That's what I want to find out.......now, by realistic I mean like....Tony for Lillard won't work because Lillard only made 4.2 million this year...You stumped me with the word 'realistic' Is that possible with Trade options for Tony?
Who could fix my account? I can't start threads, can't access my profile and edit, i want my account to be fixed or delated...
The great eye.....check where this site is registered...and you get your mod...
This. Plus the Spurs have bigger issues at the center and SG position and guys that can't shoot off the bench.
...besides...the Blazers have bookooo money to spend....Lillard will be well taken care of in Portland...
Lol at Portland paying Anderson Varejao 9.7 mil to play for GS...
Spurs salaries and contracts thread I mentioned these three trades:
Parker for Teague/Sefolosha ( Fits two needs for the Spurs)
Neither New York area teams have lottery picks, and may look for star power right away to satisfy fans as the best two free agent point guards Conley/Rondo don't probably want to play there:
Parker for Grant/Calderon (Young point guard to groom, and Calderon could take the Andre Miller role but younger and better shooter)
Parker for Thaddeus Young (Least desirable.Maybe Sean Marks was the one who gave Parker the extension in the first place? Young has an extra year on his contract, and fills a need of having a big man that can score off the bench.)
well him in this uniform and his antics will guarantee that we won't ever win again. The pg position is the deepest in the league. If you actually think a 34 year old pg(35 next season) that can't defend anyone and is inconsistent on offense should continue to start on a championship contender, then I don't know what else to say..
he certainly can't defend Westbrook, nor can he defend Curry, nor can he defend Lillard for that matter....hat can't defend anyone and is inconsistent on offense
Numbers work, but what is in it for Atanta? ..you would need to sweeten the pot with a first round pick IMO...Parker for Teague/Sefolosha ( Fits two needs for the Spurs)
A 1st round draft pick.
nicca should of been shown the door since 2010 tbh
I don't want anyone on the NY Knicks not named Porzingus..Neither New York area teams have lottery picks, and may look for star power right away to satisfy fans as the best two free agent point guards Conley/Rondo don't probably want to play there:
Grant is a project...so your basically trading Parker for Calderon....Parker for Grant/Calderon (Young point guard to groom, and Calderon could take the Andre Miller role but younger and better shooter)
that would be a heist for us. parker is net negative right now with his salary considered. trading him for 0 would be a gain
Well if the Spurs were willing to trade Parker, it probably won't be too hard. With the cap rising to $92 million, there's going to be a number of teams who need to get past the cap floor. Or at least teams with tons of cap space that miss out on the other FA's and need someone to strengthen the bench.
But the Spurs won't trade Parker due to loyalty. Might just have to wait out the final 2 years.
Wow. Nothing to do with your statement, just the thread le made me realize that I've wanted to trade Tony so many times over the years. Some of them were a good idea and some of them were a very bad idea. For example, as far back as 2003 I wanted to trade him for Gary Payton. One of the most recent times was in a draft day trade for Andre Drummond. I thought we needed a mobile big that can rebound and block shots, so Drummond was my target as I thought he had a lot of potential. Not sure if any of those trades would have been good ones or not, probably not, but now that it would be beneficial to trade him, I just don't think we can get anything of value back for him.You stumped me with the word 'realistic' Is that possible with Trade options for Tony?
He could fit a team like New York, Orlando, and a few other Eastern Conference teams. I wouldn't want to dump Tony over money. He's been too important to the team since 2003.
Well, the Spurs can't go back and re-do his contract so the only option is trying to trade him. His play isn't worth the money he's getting paid. I have no idea why RC extended that contract without first seeing how he played during the 2015 season. Just stupid stuff. I didn't like it at the time, really didn't like it at the end of last season, and now after this season I absolutely hate it.
If you can find the right offer, I can agree that he's not the same guy from as recent as 2013-14. But, for the sake of sanity, I want it in the Eastern Conference. Parker would be an upgrade over at least a third of the leagues PG play even at 34, IMO.
TBH this team wouldn't be the same without him, his presence. Same can be said for Manu, Duncan, but there is the reality now that the Spurs need to adapt and guys pushing 40 aren't gonna help this Spurs roster get better. So loyalty is a huge part, but also these guys aren't gonna be able to play at the high level the NBA demands forever. Both Duncan, Manu have another year in them but as bench players. Parker is still a starter, but his game is slowly regressing sadly. It's up to the Spurs FO to trade Parker, they wont do it due to loyalty unless it mean't signing Kevin Durant or something.
Tony for Lillard AND McCollum
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
