Reply With Quote
He's not gong anywhere. No one is stupid enough to take on a bench warmer owed 30 mil over two years. Stop.
The mods disabled your thread creating and other features cause you're a ty poster.
He's not gong anywhere. No one is stupid enough to take on a bench warmer owed 30 mil over two years. Stop.
Spurs aren't trading Parker. They wouldn't even cut that fat uselesa piece of Bonner. You seriously think they'd trade a member of the big 3? Gtfo. Our only hope is that Parker is willing to take a bench role and be a 6th man of sorts.
None of those guys could defend each other, either.
Tony Parker is very tradeable. He is not "cap trash."
The Spurs would not have to sweeten the pot to trade TP, they would get something back in return.
Is that the question asked by this thread? If not that, then what?
I agree, his contract may be to us but there are teams out there that need some of the things Tony can still provide.
His skills just don`t fit this team anymore.
Yep when the big pay scale goes up your going to see some really ty contracts that makes Parker look OH SO GOOD>.......
Can a contract be "restructured" so that a player can flat out take less money? Not just spread the amount over more years, but overwrite the original contract so that the amount of the contract can be lowered?
If that's possible, that's what we need to convince Tony and the team to do. His contract is really gonna hurt us otherwise. And there would be no trading him even if he wasn't a historic player because everyone can see that he is only slightly less done than Tim and Manu.
Boris/TP to ATL
Teague/Splitter + pick to SA
Who are you bringing in that is so much better? Sounds like you want a superstar, I don't think the Clips are dealing for him straight up..
FWIW, Teague or Schröder are available since both want to start
We'd have to give them picks. Boris when he's not giving a is probably worse than an injured Tiago.
Teague > Parker.
So we can waste Leonard and LMA? Are you ing stupid?
Parker isn't some evil spirit.. As soon as we get a starting quality pg he's gone. Because this team can't suspend the ing cba it must make hard choices. Those choices might result in the least bad option being starting Parker. Please acknowledge basic logic. I don't want to make the same comments ever second page.
Contracts can't be restructured. Stop suggesting it.
Regarding trade ability....consider that Parker isn't the only bad player out there. Parker is very tradable for another bad asset.
Now as most of y'all know, this team doesn't need bad players. But if you insist on a trade for good players you will probably be denied by the other team.
This. He's easily the most accomplished PG of his era. The nerve of some of you Spur Fans.
Notice how the majority of the people who want us to hold on to parker till the end of his contract are fans of other teams, trolls, or jingoistic frenchies.
Parker is here to stay tbqh, nobody would trade his skills for that contract, it was a lifetime achievement contract tbh of which he totally deserved
It sucks because that's 2 years of LMA/KL prime we're wasting 15 million on but what are you gonna do... Tony is family
u don't need a superstar. U just need a pg that can somewhat stay in front of their assignment on offense and not be hit and a pg that knows he's a pg. Doesn't have to be a superstar for those things.
He doesn't have to be traded, but we aint winning with him starting. That's a fact.
people overestimate Bobo's value. He works well only in limited and very specific situations. There's a reason Charlotte cut him. He's trade fodder at best to teams who have no idea how to use him. Parker's championship experience, veteran leadership, and above average mid-range game can find value around the league but the Spurs will be hard-pressed to find takers for a PG with dwindling athletic abilities and a mediocre stroke from deep, especially with that kind of contract. Mills' value fizzled in the playoffs.
It's not fair, no reason to do this, at least should give warning first, what they did to my account jinxed the spurs, they shouldn't did it...
The mods disabled your thread creating and other features cause you're a ty poster.
It seems like the Spurs want to go the route of moving Parker to the bench to take over that Manu role from what it sounds like in the recent interest in Conley. In which it's going to be very difficult to replicate because Manu could play, and guard three positions and was a much better playmaker even past his prime. Parker has a hard time guarding his own position hate to say that. Unless Durant lists the players in his meeting with the Spurs of who he wants to play with and Green is on that list, and Parker isn't then I think Green will be the preferred guy to traded by PATFO imo. I don't think the Spurs will entertain the deal of getting rid of Parker unless they get someone(s) that help now and in the future. I can't wait until the draft, and free agency starts. Even if they're some nice american players that could help especially athletically when we pick. If they go international again, I think they're going after big names in free agency again imo.
Porker fan logic: "MVParker is the head of the snake, a superstar, the alpha! But we can't trade him because nobody else wants him."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions