Reply With Quote
A minor can be willing and still be sexually assaulted. Not rocket science here.
No a minor can't give consent I've said that repeatedly. That underage boy took advantage of an awesome situation. Same could be said for the situation of the 17 year old getting his sucked by Hastert, but I don't claim to know his sexuality."Dodging" a whopper of a question there. My answer is, "maybe...but defending Dennis Hastert definitely makes you a pedophile defender." Are you satisfied with my answer?
Those women took advantage of an underage boy. They committed a crime. Now while that boy may have been "willing", the state and federal government RIGHTLY don't allow a CHILD to make decisions like that because they are children. Do you comprehend age of consent yet Pedo-Defender? If CC is the captain, does that make you his lieutenant?
A minor can be willing and still be sexually assaulted. Not rocket science here.
While you are good at regurgitating criticisms leveled at you whenever a GOP figure or issue is criticized, you don't know how to apply them properly.
The TSA and CC way: state mitigating and exculpatory arguments exclusively to support the disgraced then make the socially acceptable thesis when called on it. Have the best of both worlds even if it makes you a nihilist dimwit.
It has been confirmed long ago. None of this is made up. You and sanity are gullible s.
But Trump does the same thing. Many of his products are made outside the United States. Most Donald J. Trump ties are made in China. Some Donald J. Trump suits are also made in China.
Donald J. Trump signature men's dress shirts are made in China, Bangladesh or "imported," meaning they were made abroad.
And it's not just Donald's products. Harvard professor and trade expert Robert Lawrence analyzed over 800 items in the Ivanka Trump fashion line. There are shoes, dresses, purses and scarves. All are "imported."
http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/08/news...d-trump-trade/
How about you do some research eh?
Find a single quote of me saying Trumps swag wasn't made in China. I'll save you time, you won't.
So what are your thoughts on the Rueters article? Are you done claiming none of the emails were classified at the time sent?
No I meant when it comes to everything Hillary. You take everything you read on her for concrete facts. Things are more complex than just laying fault.
Are you still disputing the fact that those emails were classified when sent?
They were.Are you still disputing the fact that those emails were classified when sent?
Were what?
Returning veterans are twice as likely to become chronically homeless as other Americans, according to Veterans Inc. Women veterans are four times as likely to become homeless as male veterans.
Veteran homelessness affects vets for nearly six years on average, compared to four years on average among non-veterans, according to Green Doors.
About 40 percent of homeless vets are African American or Hispanic, according to the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans. African Americans account for just over 10 percent of the veteran population while Hispanics represent less than four percent of vets in the United States.
The number of homeless veterans in America was estimated at 49,933 in January 2014, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness. That was a decline by 33 percent, or 24,837 people, from 2010 due to national efforts to deal with the problem.
Breaking News at Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/...#ixzz48yO5xr7d
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
the WC ratio -- and consistency -- of exactly wrong takes continues to amaze
Are you sure about that?
"Most veterans are quite well off."
any estimate of how many are des ute or homeless?
see the previous page
OK, tell us.
What percentage of veterans are in that category compared to non veterans?
The previous page is 100 posts. Care to specify?
start ten posts back. good luck finding it!
Lol "you disprove my stupid claim"
Well, Oregon democrats voted 55.5% for Sanders vs. 42.9% for sHillary.
http://gov.oregonlive.com/election/
http://theweek.com/articles/623728/n...sidential-raceNationally, according to Gallup, there have been more Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents in the U.S. every year since 1991, when the pollsters started consistently measuring party leanings. According to Pew, Democrats have outnumbered Republicans since FDR was president, with the sole exception of 1995, when Republicans had a 1-point advantage.
(Pew Research Center)
It's hard to escape the conclusion that if Democrats voted, they would win a lot more. The fact that they don't should probably worry Hillary Clinton
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
