kyles well established quan y= CRAP
Rockets tried to recruit Bosh by showing him a photoshopped picture of him, Yao, and Aaron Brooks holding a championship
Good idea, these GM's are idiots![]()
kyles well established quan y= CRAP
Better idea would be to trade Diaw to New Orleans for the 36th and 40th picks.
They need a replacement for Anderson. Diaw is sort of a floor spacer (even though his mid range shooting percentage is mediocre and he does not take nearly enough 3's)
I think Gentry was on the coaching staff in Phoenix at the time Diaw was there.
Spurs would have three picks in the top 40,
I'll allow it, tbh.
Celtics would laugh at this trade suggestion and hang the phone on your ass for this re ed idea.
NEXT....
+2 Too young and still improving. I could see Diaw getting traded though.
I'd guess kyle is good for a late late first at least. The league knows the spurs are being patient and everyone said he was worth it when the pick happened. Contrary to re s here, Kyle hasn't done anything to really say he's a bust.
why, to draft somebody they'll leave in europe for 2 or 3 years?
Diaw/ Mills for Jeff Teague >>
I already hate the off season![]()
I love Manu but his body just can't do what his mind wants. Kyle is best suited to lead the bench to the style of motion offense that we lacked this year. 20-25 minutes of Kyle = MIP and 12 pts, 7 boards , 5 assists and 1 steal a game.
If he doesn't win MIP next year I will impose a self-ban that I have no intention of keeping.
Last edited by LongtimeSpursFan; 05-18-2016 at 01:56 AM.
Nobody is taking Diaw, he could just become lazy fat if not motivated. Nobody is taking such risk.
I could possibly see that if ATL is serious about going with Shrouder
Spurs would then have to make the decision of Parker or Teague as a starter. I think that Parker would be best off the bench, he can still play but I think it would be best if he could play more against second units.
$7 million is a drop in the bucket with a cap that could easily reach $90 million. Some team would take that risk. If it does not work then he can be traded or waived to save the team from paying out all of his salary.
Here comes the Kyle Nut-Hugging crew. What trade do you think would be a less of a re ed idea? We want to hear it.
from the celts view i'd ask for danny green. Maybe 16 for danny plus spurs first
What about Simmons, Danny and the 29th for the 16th and 23rd picks? Celts have 3 picks in the 1st round; 3, 16 and 23.
Not a bad deal, Diaw is old and Kyle is horribly overrated imho. But I'm not sure if 16th pick makes much sense, I'd prefer a lottery pick at the very least.
Never underestimate the idiocy of GMs
Must of the teams struck-out in the 2011 Draft
BTW, this is the 2016 1st Rnd Order:
1. Philadelphia
2. Los Angeles Lakers
3. Boston (From Brooklyn)
4. Phoenix
5. Minnesota
6. New Orleans
7. Denver (From New York)
8. Sacramento
9. Toronto (From Denver via New York)
10. Milwaukee
11. Orlando
12. Utah
13. Phoenix (From Washington)
14. Chicago
15. Denver (From Houston)
16. Boston (From Dallas)
17. Memphis
18. Detroit
19. Denver (From Portland)
20. Indiana
21. Atlanta
22. Charlotte
23. Boston
24. Philadelphia (From Miami via Cleveland)
25. Los Angeles Clippers
26. Philadelphia (From Oklahoma City via Denver and Cleveland)
27. Toronto
28. Phoenix (From Cleveland via Boston)
29. San Antonio
30. Golden State
Celtics will not change the 16 by Mills + Diaw, that's all (especially after SAS having achieved Kawhi with pick 15, no GM will make that mistake, especially Ainge).
Now that Philly got the #1 pick overall (Simmons/Ingram) with also having multiple bigs to play, what about this trade at the draft?
Spurs to PHILA:
a)Parker
b)Danny
c)Diaw
PHILA to Spurs:
a)Okafor
b)24th overall Pick
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)