I care more about spur les then cement kawhi's legacy
The Second best spur ever.
Crazy how much he's exceeded expectations.
I care more about spur les then cement kawhi's legacy
We all do..
"Why win another championships as the lead guy? how about 32 MPG and another 10 rest games in 2017 as you enter your prime next season? the the system will take care of the rest..you are just another cog in it "
From a legacy perspective, he broke through in 2014, but I don't think 2014 seals anything. He's improved dramatically from last year to this year, but he needs to take another big step to get above Robinson and Manu and probably Parker.
To be honest, I'd trade Kawhi for a young David Robinson without a second thought. Imagine having Robinson in this era.
agree, imagine D-Rob playing in the league today, damn
lol winning a championship, first win a round as best player, don't get barnsed...
Give me Robinson 11 times out of 10. Even FMVP/DPOY kawhi
Only an idiot would say such nonsense. How about leading the team, cause you realize this is a "team" sport, back to the WCF first.
Last edited by J_Paco; 05-20-2016 at 07:43 PM.
He hasn't even showed up for a FULL series, meaning each game
He will never win a championship as the top guy. He's a third banana tbh
All Porker had going for him was the 2007 FMVP & finishing top 5 in MVP voting. Well, Kawhi has the FMVP & finished 2nd in MVP, not to mention his DPOY & All-NBA 1st Team honors.
You mean like 2008 KG?![]()
Perfect comparison tbh.
He's the KG of Small Forwards. Was always the third best player in his position when he played, came up short in the playoffs, shot too many mid range shots at times, etc.
Do you really think a team couldn't win with kawhi as a second option? I knew you were had like zero basketball knowledge but damn you might actually be downs.
If Steph breaks his ankles, Durant leaves the Thunder, and Lebron fails a drug test... Absolutely
Regardless of ignorance of some, Parker has been a good player for years. Kawhi may be better, but he hasn't played as long and proven to be this good every year. Parker has had a HOF career. Anyone that thinks otherwise doesn't know basketball.
Kawhi might be one of the top 5 Spurs eventually, but he surely isn't yet. He could have a career-ending injury next season and he'd not even be in the top 10. Longevity has to count for something. Duncan, Manu, and Parker (and previously Robinson, Iceman, etc.) have been doing this thing a long time... There's a good chance Kawhi won't even be in the league at age 38-40, as Duncan and Ginobili are. Most players are washed up long before that.
I am not hating on Kawhi, BTW, but he's basically had one great season, and we got bounced in the second round of the playoffs then. Let's see some more before we start anointing him as one of the all-time great Spurs.
are you the guy who's been creating these anti-David Robinson threads?
Last edited by JohnnyMax; 05-20-2016 at 08:59 PM.
If it's dominant like 2003 Duncan sure......But if it's best player like 2014 finals then no. Robison is just so much better as a player.
When it mattered, Porker played like a HOFer for an ENTIRE championship run ONLY in 2007.![]()
Except his fortunes have been the reverse of KG's thus far, which means he will be raising banners during his peak since KG was toiling in mediocrity.![]()
You mean like Admiral during the majority his PRIME?![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)