Reply With Quote
Both losses said more about the Spurs not being that good IMO..
Eliminate us, then proceed to give up 3-1 series leads. Both championship potential too.
Both losses said more about the Spurs not being that good IMO..
^last year was a bit of a championship hangover and injuries . This year, just a totally new system/team. Other teams had continuity
You're opinion is wrong. Thunder were very fortunate to get passed the Spurs.
Have to agree. This coming from someone who actually thought we were good enough to win a le both years...unfortunately was proven wrong both times when we proceeded to the bed in the postseason.
And by the way, the Clippers had no chance at winning a le last year
Curse of the Spurs lives on! Any team that gets by us with the refs help are doomed! Lol!
**FIFY**
2:51.0 T. Parker misses 3-pt shot from 23 ft 103-102 2:50.0 Offensive rebound by K. Leonard 103-102 2:48.0 K. Leonard makes 2-pt shot from 2 ft +2 105-102 2:31.0 105-102 C. Paul misses 2-pt shot from 3 ft 2:29.0 Defensive rebound by T. Parker 105-102 2:25.0 T. Parker misses 2-pt shot from 4 ft 105-102 2:22.0 105-102 Defensive rebound by M. Barnes 2:12.0 105-105 +3 M. Barnes makes 3-pt shot from 25 ft (assist by J. Re ) 1:52.0 B. Diaw misses 2-pt shot from 2 ft 105-105 1:51.0 105-105 Defensive rebound by M. Barnes 1:33.0 105-105 B. Griffin misses 2-pt shot from 4 ft (block by D. Green) 1:31.0 Defensive rebound by T. Parker 105-105 1:27.0 T. Parker misses 2-pt shot at rim (block by J. Re ) 105-105
1:08.0 90-90 T. Parker misses 2-pt shot from 19 ft 1:08.0 Defensive rebound by D. Waiters 90-90 0:55.0 Shooting foul by D. Green (drawn by K. Durant) 90-90 0:55.0 K. Durant makes free throw 1 of 2 +1 91-90 0:55.0 K. Durant makes free throw 2 of 2 +1 92-90 0:43.0 Personal foul by S. Adams 92-90 0:43.0 92-91 +1 T. Parker makes free throw 1 of 2 0:43.0 92-91 T. Parker misses free throw 2 of 2 0:42.0 Defensive rebound by R. Westbrook 92-91 0:42.0 Oklahoma City full timeout 92-91 0:30.0 Turnover by K. Durant (lost ball; steal by D. Green) 92-91 0:11.0 92-91 T. Parker misses 2-pt shot from 20 ft
Spurs would have lost Gm 6 @ OKC in 2014 if Porker wasn't out for the 2nd half.Have to agree. This coming from someone who actually thought we were good enough to win a le both years...unfortunately was proven wrong both times when we proceeded to the bed in the postseason.
And by the way, the Clippers had no chance at winning a le last year
Move on now nothing to see here.....What happened ...Happened....build a bridge and get over it.....forget the past already....
We would be 50/50 against Warriors. I don't see how they guard Aldridge.
Like we were 50/50 against OKC, 3 games were decided in the last plays and by bizarre calls.
But of course internet forum users have to have takes like "Wow that means Warriors would beat us"
Hey dummy, it was pretty obvious that OKC, GSW and SAS were extremely close. If these series were played again we could see us beating Thunder, or Thunder beating Warriors. There wasn't a basketball difference, just some momentum, luck and calls. Specially luck and calls.
Funnily enough, even losing, I thought Thunder had the control of the game against Warriors, way more than against us. It was not untill game 5 and 6 that Thunder started to bully our tired body in the boards.
Long story short, if we have a corpse 5 who can defend in the mold of Ayers instead of David ing West, we are in the finals.
Fact: no team ever beat Duncan/Parker/Ginobili and went on to win it all (except Heat in which case there was no further series). Spurs death rattle curse.
Spurs next year tbh...
You bear that team you pay, BBALL GODS get you and the refs can't even save you later
Both teams ted on Kahwi... Embarrassing, tbh
Both teams ted on Kahwi... Embarrassing, tbh
Spurs lost 2 home games in both series, seriously? Thats the most disappointing part tbh
They were simply the better team.
Especially this year. Couldn't believe it
FIFYMario Chalmers ted on Porker... Embarrassing, tbh
The Spurs have been so successful the past fifteen years that every season that doesn't end in a championship is considered a "failure." For them to win 67 games in a season where the big 3 all play reduced roles is a small miracle. It's extremely rare for an elite team to significantly change their personnel with no down years-- just ask the Lakers and the Celtics....
Clips last year, OKC this year... Custer's Last Stand. All three are ing history. The good guys lost - unless you happen to be one of the other guys.
It's kind of funny that after the Battle of the Little Bighorn, the analysis was that it was "a bad match-up, and they just made more shots than we did." I think there's a lesson here, but I'm too in lazy to look for it.
It's just history.. get over yourself.
Matt Barnes last year, Andre Roberson this year
When will Kahwi have his first FULL good series?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
