So are you saying this story from Politicusa is fake?Bro you just read les, not click links or look at what news sources report huh?
Click his link
OK, let's try other sources..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rt-claims.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/donal...clinton-2016-5
https://heatst.com/politics/deadbeat...n-out-of-cash/
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...-on-funds.html
That enough? I could probably find a couple more.
First two are fine, but I don't see the problem tbhSo are you saying this story from Politicusa is fake?
OK, let's try other sources..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rt-claims.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/donal...clinton-2016-5
https://heatst.com/politics/deadbeat...n-out-of-cash/
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...-on-funds.html
That enough? I could probably find a couple more.
Man can just write a check if he needed to.
Does this even register with Trump clones?
Has the media been able to ask Trump specifically about this? Oh I know he will dodge dip and weave, but has he been asked?
Does it really matter when he cut the checks? So far Trump has donated $5.6 million to vets, compared to what, Hillary's $75,000?
yes, it matters.
I assume, given his history of bad deals and lies, and that he has been asking for campaign funds (iow, he was lying that he was "independent" of donors he's now seeking), that he was going to keep the funds to himself, but a REAL journalist exposed his scheme.
Damn you are funny sometimes, Bookaki!
CosmicParasite is competing with Darrin, TB
Damn you are funny sometimes, Bookaki!
CosmicParasite is competing with Darrin, TB
Trash's recent, even long-time, record is the best predictor of what he's done recently and will do. no hallucinations, at all.
New From The Repug Fantasy World, as related by a Trash-sucker
Mitch McConnell sees Republican Party ‘at an all-time high’
for all the talk of the GOP’s upheaval, the Kentucky Republican says he doesn’t think a Trump nomination will redefine the Republican Party in any substantial way. The party is now at “an all-time high,” he said.
That’s not a paraphrase, by the way. McConnell specifically told NPR, “I think the Republican Party is at an all-time high.”
By some metrics, this isn’t completely crazy. Democrats may have taken some solace in the clownish, at times cringe-worthy, race for the Republican presidential nomination, but the “GOP is dead” rhetoric is wishful thinking belied by some raw numbers.
Republicans currently hold most of the nation’s gubernatorial offices, most of the nation’s state legislatures, a majority in the U.S. House, and a majority in the U.S. Senate. The GOP hasn’t seen numbers like these since the 1920s.
It’s really not that surprising that Mitch McConnell is feeling pretty good.
The trouble, of course, is that the Senate Majority Leader’s analysis overlooks some of the more alarming details that suggest the Republican Party’s “all-time high” is a peak from which to fall, not the start of a bold far-right era.
The Pew Research Center published a striking report in April, for example, that found the GOP’s public support reaching its lowest point in a quarter-century.
As we talked about at the time, Republicans have lost ground with women and men; whites, blacks, and Latinos; Americans of every age group; and voters of every level of education.
This year, Republicans are likely to lose another presidential race.
As things stand, the odds also suggest their U.S. Senate majority is in jeopardy, and there are even rumblings about control of the U.S. House.
Republicans have struggled for years to come up with some kind of policy agenda, but on most of the major issues of the day, the American mainstream prefers Democratic solutions.
In a country that’s growing more diverse and tolerant, the contemporary GOP is increasingly dependent on an older, white voting base.
The most popular politician in America is President Obama – whose public support is roughly triple that of the GOP-led Congress – despite years of robust Republican efforts to destroy him.
And against this backdrop Republican voters completely ignored party leaders and handed the GOP’s presidential nomination to a demagogic reality-show personality who’s never served a day in public office.
For all the speculation about Donald Trump’s ability to win over his party’s base, the fact remains that a healthy, vibrant political party in a global superpower would never have rallied behind such a candidate in the first place.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...d=sm_fb_maddow
Hillary went ham on this guy.
http://www.vox.com/2016/6/2/11843550...ton-trump-risk
Iran has nukes?
Reading is fundamental
"...ayatollah got nukes". You understand the word got implies they currently have nukes. Writing is fundamental.
Learn to read dumbass.
Too stupid to understand "laid the groundwork" ?
Trump is the one making commments about letting other countries have nukes so they can fight amongs each other.
going down in san Jose black and Hispanic Hillary supporters mob beating female Trump supporters
How do you embed tweets on here?
Helicopter feed
What is the extent of Iran's nuclear capability today, and what role did Hillary Clinton play in getting them there?
This must be what CosmicParasite is babbling about
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-...eal-1441753099
She doesn't seem to be friendly with Iran
http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-...eal-1441753099
Seriously? Do you not follow any current events?
Let's take this in pieces since you don't appear to be capable putting together a coherent thought.
What is the extent of Iran's nuclear capability today?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote