You said that you couldn't imagine any 14 year old boy just sitting there and allowing Hastert to jerk them off too, fattie. You do this with everything: set your expectations for others based on your expectations for yourself. You also tell us what you would do in the various violent episodes and the like. It's quite revealing.
I understand you wanting to distance yourself with this dissembling . You sure do look like a ing creeper between the above and posting articles every time a pedo teacher comes up in the news.
When you don't even try and argue my points directly it tells me I've scored a hit. I cannot say for sure you are a pedo but you do show warning signs
What point am I supposed to argue directly? I don't approve of male creepers. Period.
I'm tired of repeating it.
And yeah, I relate my expectations of others by my expectations for myself. Who doesn't, really?
If you think it's OK to let a coach suck your I'm OK with that too. I'm not gay phobic. I just wouldn't do it myself.
I set expectations for others on their own merits independent of myself. You sure are a narcissist, fattie.
And of course you wouldn't out approve because that would make you a pariah and you sure are cognizant of how other's view and treat you. That doesn't preclude you from supporting them with your rhetoric in the least. You think pedos admit it publicly? To the contrary and in the end actions, what you are doing, is much more important than what you claim.
What you haven't adequately answered is why you brought up how you couldn't imagine those kids doing anything other than consenting. I don't believe that it was just to point out how you wouldn't have let it happen. Either way you are denigrating the kids relative to your all important self which serves to support the convicted pedophile.
You haven't adequately explained how why you now try to couch your response in this most recent canned answer where you leave out the part of how you think 'any 14 year old' would behave in those cir stance. Pedos do hide and deceive.
You also haven't adequately explained why over the years you post every article relating to a pedo teacher that you find. There is yet another one in the club as we speak. You defend the pedo teachers there too.
Like I said, I cannot be sure that you are a pedo through this medium but you have shown more than enough warning signs for people to be wary for all your throwaway dismissals that you don't act according to. Hypocrisy seems to come naturally to you.
It's really simple. If you are a teenage athlete confronted by a Pedophile coach you have three basic options.
Fight
Flee
Acquiesce
If there are any other viable options please feel free to post them.
As far as the "hot teacher" articles, as a teenager I would have loved to have found one. A three way with two of them would be even better.
Again, if you wouldn't have banged a hot female teacher when you were in high school given the opportunity I don't judge you. You might have been saving yourself for the right coach. Whatever floats your boat.
And now he tries the bait and switch. Your dissembling serves to make you look more culpable and not less. I'm here to talk about why people might be worried that you are a pedophile.
It's really simple. If you are a teenage athlete confronted by a Pedophile coach you have three basic options.
Fight
Flee
Acquiesce
If there are any other viable options please feel free to post them.
What your deduction was is obvious. It's how I got to the conclusion that I did after all. It's also only an ancillary point to the overall point I was making which stemmed from the fact that you think they acquiesced. Thanks for underscoring the logic I was using though.
. If they didn't acquiesce, what do you call it?
The facts are the facts.
Give me a better word if you disagree with that one.
I'm not going to argue your dumbed down interpretation of psychology. The truth of the matter is that he is a convicted pedophile and you continue to try to paint the scenario in a mitigating light defending him.
. If they didn't acquiesce, what do you call it?
The facts are the facts.
Give me a better word if you disagree with that one.
He's going to jail in utter disgrace likely until he dies no matter what we argue here so I don't care about that minutiae. What concerns me is why you keep defending pedophiles, fattie.
You are such a ing lier. I'm not defending Hastert.
You can't answer a simple question and just bluster again.
Saying that the victim acquiesced is a mitigating cir stance. Giving mitigating cir stances is what defense attorneys do. You can make mindless assertions all you like and wave your hands at meaningless questions if if makes you feel better.
That you think they acquiesced is central to the point that I am making. Your questions premise is meaningless to the point I am making. I agree that you think that way. You are right to think that I think differently but again dullard, that is besides the point. It's what you think that is key.
mitigating cir stance
Bull
You are just making up now.
If acquiesce doesn't describe the situation pick a better word.
Legally, a 14 cannot consent. There are very good reasons for this which you apparently don't understand. This only serves to underscore the overall point about you showing pedo proclivities.
Bull
You are just making up now.
If acquiesce doesn't describe the situation pick a better word.
Good job. Acting the obtuse dimwit isn't helping you in this instance, pedobear.
Fuzzy run run running away. Refuses to answer the question and just throws more unsubstantiated insults. Typical.
This goes back to your narcissism. Just because I didn't answer your question how you wanted doesn't mean I didn't answer it. Do you need me to quote where I answer your question? You do seem to struggle with simple concepts.
As for unsubstantiated:
Answer indeed.
I really don't put much stock into the whole notion of 'running away' or that not answering questions is all that revealing yet CC clearly puts major import into such things. He has left and I indicated inadequate answers to several questions that he has dodged from the start. What can I make of that?
Talk about a narcissist.
Quoting yourself.
When you dodge questions I'm going to go on repeat to save time. You can make up whatever stories to make you feel better, pedobear. You still have not adequately addressed those questions and people have very good reason to believe that you might abuse children as you clearly support those that do again and again.Talk about a narcissist.
Quoting yourself.
Tell me more about how I dodge questions please.
Acquiesce
Pick a better word
*fuzzy ducks and runs*
*fuzzy counters by making ridiculous, insulting, totally unsubstantiated claims*
Get a job, loser.
Let's pretend that I didn't answer your question by rejecting it's premise as besides the point and let's say I cannot come up with a better word than 'acquiesce,' then what, pedobear?
Can you actually make an argument to explain why you defend pedophiles? Let's see cause I don't think you can.
It's really easy dumbass. I don't defend pedophiles.
Asshole. You just make up to argue.
You fell short. You claimed that violence at Trump rallies, by Trump supporters was far more prevalent. You're going to need to provide much more than this. I haven't even posted the left is San Diego or San Jose. Admit you're a dip and move on. There is no arguing which side has used violence more during this election cycle.
You throw the term slave in knowing exactly what it implies.
Stop with your gibberish and need to one up.
You know exactly what I stated and exactly what I mean.
Stop with the juvenile distortions. I know exactly where the OP and others are coming from.
You are implying violence IN THIS CASE is a way. It's not. It's counterproductive and you know this.
"Turn the other cheek " just where the fck did I state this? This is a GD presidential election, not a revolution. Now I'm going to pull your : Is this how you make America better since it's so Fd up Mr. FuzzyTrump revolution? That article is . This is a presidential election. You are at the OPs level.
Last edited by pgardn; 06-09-2016 at 10:35 PM.
You already admitted in this thread that you wanted to participate in pedophilia with your teachers when you were a kid as reason why you post all the articles about teacher pedophilia. That you vicariously relive that still is extremely telling as to your disposition toward recent events: you don't see anything wrong with it.
In the most recent post when people criticized the teacher you defended her stating that they were just the statements of the sexually frustrated. That is defending a pedophile in and of itself, dimwit.
You also told us that you set expectations on others based on what you expected of yourself.
What then are we supposed to make of you saying that Hastert's victims were willing after you revel in other teachers having sex with willing teens? You obviously think consent exonerates the behavior. You can call it acquiesce or whatever but its there just the same.
Are you a registered sex offender?
No, I actually knew you'd do this, as you are now doing....Deflect duck dodge ....
Kill your alt asap, you had a ty run. Or back your claim and stop being a pussy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote