Reply With Quote
What really happened...
Fire Weakens Steel but not Woman Waving in WTC North Tower
What really happened...
Gross negligence seems much more likely than any concrete conspiracy. Flight 93 crashing into a field proves as much.
George Bush...
Kurt Sonnenfeld....first some background....
And now....The Kurt Sonnenfeld videos.......
Part 2
finally, for those of you who still have doubts...
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1
MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 2
Of course, RG won't watch any of these....so.....
Spam away the same old . You cannot make a cogent argument on your own. Thinking for yourself is not your strong suit. Confirmation bias sophistry at it's finest.
What ever Fuzzy....one final spoonfeeding for RG...
Initially.
Read the report.
No, there weren't.
But hey, your claim, your burden of proof.
Please show where "cell" phone calls were made.
Remember "cellular" includes seat back phones, twit.
Ok, thanks for the funny.
"why do falling things keep accelerating?"
HOLY that is funny.
The guy does some ill-designed experiments in his back yard, misses the main concepts, and then, like every other twoofer moron, buys into, and regurgitates every stupid theory and assertion about the towers collapse without spending an iota of time/effort doing any critical thinking.
The flaws in his experiment were readily obvious to me. Care to guess what the fatal one is? Or do you care?
The only thing this video is good for, aside from the laugh factor, is to demonstrate just how bad twoofers are at actually reasoning. The throw away line at the end, scoffing about the engineers with their "equations" was particularly telling.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 06-09-2016 at 12:12 PM.
If you read the context they were talking about the initiation of the collapse. If my memory of it is correct. Feel free to actually read the whole thing, sophist.
(reads previous page with 8 or 9 youtubes from conspiracy buffs)
oh , here comes the youtube spam.
I almost forgot what it is like arguing with twoofers.
Not going to watch any of it. Already done, and every single time it was a waste. Every single ing time.
The clips never say what the twoof movement thinks they do, and get wrong all the time.
Lies, mistakes, and cherry picking.
Not convincing.
And the source of the information about it being "his cell phone"?Rg and Fuzzy don't not want you to see this....
Detailed Account of Telephone Calls From September 11th Flights
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/e...alldetail.html
For example, the slide in the right-hand column for Edward Felt indicates that he used a cell phone.
A 9-11 conspiracy website picture caption?
That is what you are hanging your hat on?
Really?
then there is the fact that even if you get to "cell phone" call, the flight was buzzing at an al ude that makes it possible.
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/flight93page1
leaving us with a "so what?"
, let's grant some measure of truth to the caption.
What does it show? That the plane was low enough to make a call near the end of its flight? Didn't we already know that?
so
ing
what?
Ghazi still chickening out of his own thread.
I spent my time watching this a while back. You're right.
You won't return the favor. You expect everybody else to watch your ty videos, then hide your head in the sand when given material to watch in turn that refutes your point very thoroughly.
Why would anyone watch your material when you aren't honest or interested enough in the truth to do the same?
So Ghazi ran the away.
What does it say about the strength of ones assertions about what is true or not, when they can't be bothered to explain even the smallest thing about them?
I guess we know what to do with the OP's theory.
The question any truther avoids answering is... why plan a conspiracy when gross negligence is so much easier to pull off and infinitely harder to prove?
The perpetrators weren't gonna leave anything to chance...this was military precision and planning...once the hijackers committed, it was a go...and even that they didn't leave to chance...
They only had this one chance, on that one day to get this right...we don't know everyone who was involved but those who would have needed to be involved include Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.....
Cheney orchestrated the NORAD simulations on Sept 11th that made the attacks a success....
How do you know NIST is lying?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
