Reply With Quote
You mean like MVPorker in the 2014 playoffs.
Excuse, excuse, excuses.......
You mean like MVPorker in the 2014 playoffs.
Excuse, excuse, excuses.......
They are more like the '92 Bulls than the '96 version:
Record: 67-15, Finished 1st in NBA Central Division (Schedule and Results)
Coach: Phil Jackson (67-15)PTS/G: 109.9 (5th of 27) ▪ Opp PTS/G: 99.5 (3rd of 27)
SRS: 10.07 (1st of 27) ▪ Pace: 94.4 (22nd of 27)
Off Rtg: 115.5 (1st of 27) ▪ Def Rtg: 104.5 (4th of 27)
Expected W-L: 66-16 (1st of 27)Arena: Chicago Stadium ▪ Attendance: 759,980 (5th of 27)NBA 1992 Playoffs:
Won NBA Finals (4-2) versus Portland Trail Blazers (Series Stats)
Won NBA Eastern Conference Finals (4-2) versus Cleveland Cavaliers (Series Stats)
Won NBA Eastern Conference Semifinals (4-3) versus New York Knicks (Series Stats)
Won NBA Eastern Conference First Round (3-0) versus Miami Heat (Series Stats)
Record: 73-9, 1st in NBA Pacific Division (Schedule and Results)
Coach: Steve Kerr (73-9)PTS/G: 114.9 (1st of 30) ▪ Opp PTS/G: 104.1 (19th of 30)
SRS: 10.38 (1st of 30) ▪ Pace: 99.3 (2nd of 30)
Off Rtg: 114.5 (1st of 30) ▪ Def Rtg: 103.8 (5th of 30)
Expected W-L: 65-17 (2nd of 30)Arena: Oracle Arena ▪ Attendance: 803,436 (7th of 30)NBA 2016 Playoffs:
Winning NBA Finals (2-0) versus Cleveland Cavaliers (Series Stats)
Won NBA Western Conference Finals (4-3) versus Oklahoma City Thunder (Series Stats)
Won NBA Western Conference Semifinals (4-1) versus Portland Trail Blazers (Series Stats)
Won NBA Western Conference First Round (4-1) versus Houston Rockets (Series Stats)
Co sign
What about when they were down 3-1 to a team not named the Spurs (the only team with a record similar to theirs)? No matter which way you look at it, they aren't the best team of all-time, though they are up there.
After the series was already over. Plus, they lost to a team that, as historic as the Bulls' season was, only lost 8 fewer games. The Sonics would have had the best record in the league most years in NBA history.
Yer regular season maybe. Not sold on the one leg thing either, his second chance to be playoff superstar and it's not workin as yet tbh.
Casual fans overreact to single games.......
Honestly, my trolling answer from earlier aside, they've had a comically easy run in the past 2 playoffs, tbh..
During this year's run, the highest-ranked defense they went up against has been the 10th ranked Cavs
To be fair, historically great teams generally face ty compe ion, which is typically the reason a team will look so dominant in relation to the others..nobody will remember the Warriors compe ion, though, they will only cite the wins and rings, and rightfully so, that's sports..
Please, I'm here saying the same thing, they've almost lost as many games in the playoffs as they did the entire regular season. They lost a game to the Rockets, Steph Curry or not (they proved they can be just fine without him) when the Rockets tried their best to give it away. They lost a game to the Blazers after getting them as a gift over the injured Clippers. The Thunder choked, which is the only reason they're still playing (and not just because they were up 3-1, they should have won Game 6).
They will have zero sweeps and I know Steph being injured is a factor but this is not the best team of all-time. They're probably in the top 15 though.
So not all time great, but best of this season and on par with 2014 spurs. Today's nba and all that.Please, I'm here saying the same thing, they've almost lost as many games in the playoffs as they did the entire regular season. They lost a game to the Rockets
They will have zero sweeps and I know Steph being injured is a factor but this is not the best team of all-time. They're probably in the top 15 though.
No one thinks the 67 win 2000 Lakers were better than the 56 win 2001 Lakers. Going down 3-1 to OKC ended any reasonable talk of this Warriors team being one of the all-time greats.Honestly, my trolling answer from earlier aside, they've had a comically easy run in the past 2 playoffs, tbh..
During this year's run, the highest-ranked defense they went up against has been the 10th ranked Cavs
To be fair, historically great teams generally face ty compe ion, which is typically the reason a team will look so dominant in relation to the others..nobody will remember the Warriors compe ion, though, they will only cite the wins and rings, and rightfully so, that's sports..
bum, the sorehead loser.
But he didn't lose to a bunch of zipperheads who took time off from the rice paddies to beat the out of a bunch of Americans too stupid to figure out how to avoid getting drafted.
Nonetheless, he's a sorehead loser.
You have no room, you won 17 games.
True, but, at least I ain't bitter over it. You get beat by OKC in Texas and you're grudging State their onions. That's the epitome of the sorehead loser.
And you disgraced America by losing to a bunch of illiterate zipperheads.
You're the definition of bitter, Dale. Shining shoes for six years now with no end in sight.
Thoughts on James Earl Ray?
They were selling your .
They were selling your .
What was more embarrassing? When you rushed the floor for Jordan ringing in your building or when you threw the parade for losing to Jordan in 93?
I think a lot of people here never actually watched the 72 win Bulls play in the RS or playoffs, they just watched highlight reels. That's why you keep reading these stupid takes about how great they were. It was basketball with one good player between both teams.
I watched them, so there goes that. I still remember how highly anticipated the Rockets-Bulls games were that season. They were poetry in motion and a thrill to watch.
The parade by default. We never rushed the floor.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
