Reply With Quote
is OP going to waste duncan's last year by posting on the only decent spurs forum?
It's not about any one person. You've got to get over yourself and realize that it takes a group to get this thing done. Besides, Kyle is like a swiss army knife, he can play all 5 positions.
is OP going to waste duncan's last year by posting on the only decent spurs forum?
Ok, thanks genius. I'll take your assessment of his play, cross reference it with PATFO, Sean Elliott, league officials that praised his improvement, and then put it in the toilet, on it, then flush it down the ing drain.
Carry on.
yeah, the geniuses that kept Bonner around for 10 years.
Ultimate Spurs homer. Almost convinced me that Ayres was decentSean Elliott,
oh yeah, so praised that he was often left alone at the 3pt line.. Just so Kyle can pass up the open shotleague officials that praised his improvement
Don't forget he hustles too!
It's a spurs forum where you talk about the spurs man. I'm not getting paid to hire fire players. I'm just a fan saying Kyle is worthless. So according to you nobody can give him or her opinion on the spurs. Only front office and sean? Eat a snickers
when Kyle suddenly becomes the point forward of the Spurs, then everyone here criticizing him shall be shocked.....
Hopefully the #1 pick will be worth the tanking, tbh...
Delusional Spur fan will be happy with how the team played in the first few months of the season before Tim had to use a wheel chair on court to get around and before Manu needed Steve Nash treatment to get into games. Parker was given a dribble count, can't dribble more than 15 times before he has to pass the ball and Kyle showed promise because he stayed in front of a few players and averaged 6 points instead of 5. This will prompt the Spurs to be the first team to ever Draft and Stash a #1 while they bring the back together for one more more run.
True, but everyone should be rerady to catch and shoot on this team, regardless of what your strong point is. It also doesn't excuse the sometimes lackadaisical stuff defensively regarding loose-balls/rebounding, etc... I know he's on the slower side, but instincts have to be better.
(decent write-up on Anderson here- http://www.poundingtherock.com/2016/...couting-report )
Cojo started coming into his own towards the end, when Parker would sit out and he would take over. I think that OKC game 6 series where he was just amazing in the closeout with Parker out was an indicator of what he could do. Anytime he came in, he was usually solid. Didn't try and do too much, maybe not as aggressive as he could be, but he was never out of character. He hurt us offensively at times cause he wasn't a scorer, but he was a very good defender, and we could always count on him for that. So re: Anderson, you might be right. He might be able to flourish somewhere else. That's OK for both sides IMO if it comes to that. I just think Anderson needs to get stronger in other areas other than what his "comfort" zone is. You don't become great by staying in your comfort zone, you have to be able to do other things, at any given time.Cojo didn't really flourish until he got out of San Antonio. He did make strides, but he was not a regular and was always yanked in and out and ceding time to Mills. Do something like that to Ginobili or any of the regular vets. It does affect rhythm, confidence etc. Anderson may be the same way as Cojo unfortunately. It may take him being somewhere else with more opportunities for him to flourish and then we'd be here thinking wtf was Pop thinking.
Mills had a down year, but he is key because he spreads the floor and can get going in a hurry offensively. Just prior to the shoulder surgery, he was a huge reason why we won it all. Not to mention we got him much cheaper than we should've cause of the shoulder surgery, so his contract isn't an issue. He's a shooter, and shooters struggle. (See Danny Green) but when they get going, it makes the team soooo much better and dangerous. So you live with some of the shots they take/miss. I don't think the Mills experiment was a flop by any means. I think we just had several guys have down years, in a very new system with a guy like LMA coming in. Mills is only 27, so I don't see them going away from what they tried. I think they'll tinker a bit, and maybe we'll see our younger guys get a few more minutes, but Pop is a stickler for corporate knowledge. If the Anderson/Simmons/Boban's of the world still make mistakes that they shouldn't, it'll hurt their chances of playing . Idk if that's fair or not, but that's usually how it is.Cojo could have served us more than Mills going forward who was a perfect to complement Ginobili but the bench should no longer be structured like that. It's time to put the ball in someone younger's hands. I think personally Pop gave the chance to Mills this past season while he also tried to develop both Simmons and Anderson whenever he could spare it (garbage time and towards the end of the season). The Mills experiment was a flop, so it's time to try someone new.
Wtf, all these people saying " people that hate Kyle don't understand the game", major bs. The play where the okc guy shoots the corner 3 and Kyle is so confused as to who to cover sums up his game.
The ones that have won you 5 NBA les and counting, and who is nearly universally considered the creme de la creme of NBA coaches and front offices.
You are dismissed.
You should bring facts to back up your like, opinions, man.
He was 22. I bet you ed up plenty of at 22.
Never as bad as KA tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
