Hawks coach Bud arrested for DUI

[ace3g]

Maximum Sports @MaxSportsSA
Coach Bud brings several of his Hawks to SA to workout with Spurs.

[racm]

Maximum Sports @MaxSportsSA
Coach Bud brings several of his Hawks to SA to workout with Spurs.

Which ones, I wonder. Jeff Teague? John Jenkins? Dennis Schröder?

[xmas1997]

Maximum Sports @MaxSportsSA
Coach Bud brings several of his Hawks to SA to workout with Spurs.

Which ones, I wonder. Jeff Teague? John Jenkins? Dennis Schröder?

I would like to know as well.

Also, what happened to the DUI case, get swept under the rug?

[ace3g]

I would like to know as well.

Also, what happened to the DUI case, get swept under the rug?

Not sure but I'm sure part of it had to do with the workout with Wilkins; since he was going to workout for both teams, make it easy, and have both teams in same place.

[exstatic]

I lknow not to drink and drive and to make such a. Choice. Have a friend killed by one then you can spread your bull about how it's ok.

Typical Repug strawman: I say you're a wide spectrum judgmental asshole (and you are) and you turn it into "DWI is OK". Never said that, so shut the up.

[spurs10]

Typical Repug strawman: I say you're a wide spectrum judgmental asshole (and you are) and you turn it into "DWI is OK". Never said that, so shut the up.

I am not sure what a "Repug strawman" is, but I like the way it sounds.

[Spur|n|Austin]

I am not sure what a "Repug strawman" is, but I like the way it sounds.

I was going to ask the same thing.

[RuffnReadyOzStyle]

because we aren't as big a pussies as you guys. We still have the slightest little bit of resistance to big government tyranny disguised as public safety. Pretty soon even looking at booze will get you a DWI. Watch.

Now THAT is a "Repug strawman", and displays compete ignorance of the relevant science and road safety data with regard to drinking and driving. Winner of the MHRCP (aka Moronic Hard Right Conspiracist Prize!) for this thread.

Not driving while under the influence is NOT a liberty issue, it's a responsibility issue - it is each individual's responsibility not to endanger others by doing something that has been proven to be a major public safety hazard.

[MultiTroll]

If you've only had one drink, why would you refuse the breath test? Furthermore, why do you guys in the US get a choice on the breath test?

breath tests many times give a false positive.

That having been said, i am hard core supporter of don't drink and drive.
Do what you want with yourself, don't force your drunken ass on others.

[dallasmaverickslose]

Any update on this situation?

[bklynspursfan]

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atla...rial/367659908

[GSH]

Not driving while under the influence is NOT a liberty issue, it's a responsibility issue - it is each individual's responsibility not to endanger others by doing something that has been proven to be a major public safety hazard.

Speeding in a car is a major public health hazard. So is texting while driving. Drug abuse is a public health hazard. So is being too fat. But I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people here have been guilty of at least one of those.

I don't like it when people drink and drive. But all the judgmental bull here is laughable.

[Chinook]

Speeding in a car is a major public health hazard. So is texting while driving. Drug abuse is a public health hazard. So is being too fat. But I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people here have been guilty of at least one of those.

I don't like it when people drink and drive. But all the judgmental bull here is laughable.

Being fat is a personal health hazard. If fat people somehow made other people sick by being near them, then it's a public health issue. I can't agree that drinking and driving can be filed under "whoever is without sin, cast the first stone". It's reckless endangerment of life in the very least. If anything people need to be more judgmental.

[tholdren]

breath tests many times give a false positive.

That having been said, i am hard core supporter of don't drink and drive.
Do what you want with yourself, don't force your drunken ass on others.

1. you can still be arrested/charged under legal limit
2. its safer than texting, which MANY people do, but penalty is life altering for dui but accepted for "distracted driving"
3. im a hard core supporter of logic - drinking is subjective in terms of affects on body i.e. a person could drink 3 and drive better than a person who drinks 2. if neither cause an accident or harm to anyone then they should be fine, or have a zero tolerance policy

[tholdren]

Now THAT is a "Repug strawman", and displays compete ignorance of the relevant science and road safety data with regard to drinking and driving. Winner of the MHRCP (aka Moronic Hard Right Conspiracist Prize!) for this thread.

Not driving while under the influence is NOT a liberty issue, it's a responsibility issue - it is each individual's responsibility not to endanger others by doing something that has been proven to be a major public safety hazard.

Road safety data chalks up an alcohol related crash to mean that if I was a DD and you were my passenger (who consumed alcohol) and I had an accident it would be alcohol related. To use statistics blindly, like you just did, is erroneous. Again, look at the non-profit behind the laws enacted in the US. Then study the data. Don't just cite like we do Surstalk numbers.