Reply With Quote
Thoughts? Your handle is gay as
We had 2 major holes - PG and C - and could only attempt to plug one with #29.
Is anyone disappointed that we took Murray over Damian Jones? He's the athletic kind of big our roster lacks.
Or should we have traded for #31 and #35 to take Davis or Diallo and someone else?
Thoughts?
Thoughts? Your handle is gay as
Lmfao
Wow, you haven't said that before... not.Thoughts? Your handle is gay as
I tried to change it but Kori/LJ/Bruno wouldn't let me. What else can I do?
Surely those draft and stash Europeans, or those 1st rounders they've picked the fast few drafts, all of them big guys who can move....surely there's a couple who will end up stateside this fall...?
From the looks of what the tape shows, Murray was a hard talent to pass up.
A possible multi-year solution at one of the guard positions.
I was glad the Spurs did NOT pick Jones. He's too much like Mahinmi in his lack of feel for the game. Just look at how he fared when he played against someone with size and talent in AJ Hammons. It wasn't pretty. One can hope he'll improve, but he hasn't shown much of that in college.
Murray was probably the "safest" pick if PATFO were swinging for the fences due to his supposed upside, but I was really hoping they picked Malcolm Brogdon who is just as versatile, is far more disciplined and is NBA-ready.
The only player at the time I thought might be better was Ivica Zubac. But a combo guard was more of a need. They basically said they took the best player available but I think they said that cause they didn't want to offend Parker. Yes Parker, we are looking for your replacement...
We already have centers in the pipeline, no PGs. Not convinced by Jones anyway.
Wanted Deyonta Davis. Was happy with Murray. Center was NOT a need for the draft. Milutinov is as good of a prospect as an center who was left.
RC stated Murray was one of the guys the Spurs would have moved up for.
The draft move up did not work. But Murray happily fell to us anyway.
I know RC is pleased.
Very athletic, very young, with bad habits the Spurs feel they can fix. Definitely not NBA ready. So the demise of Parker has not been solved
Thoughts? Let them play a game first before we decide on who is better or who they should have drafted.
Start a thread when that happens.
Meanwhile we's a speculatin.
Go on now, git.
Wow, you haven't said that before... not.
I tried to change it but Kori/LJ/Bruno wouldn't let me. What else can I do?
Thanks for the comments everyone (except pego).
I don't get to watch a lot of college and was just wondering what people thought.
Yeah, Davis would have been a really nice pickup. I wonder if FO tried to get #31 but Grizz offered more?
Like the Spurs pick. As far as center goes, just heard D How is available for 100 mil.
All I can offer to your post is that I went back and STUDIED Milutinov and that guy could be somebody.Thanks for the comments everyone (except pego).
I don't get to watch a lot of college and was just wondering what people thought.
Yeah, Davis would have been a really nice pickup. I wonder if FO tried to get #31 but Grizz offered more?
Not a franchise guy, but a Splitter. He has that want-to already with a tiny bit of polish which shows that he adheres to teaching. Edit: sprry- he shoes adherence to teaching
I think there's a chance he may stay on the team going into the RS. I know the team is conservative. but he does everything you want a madern day center to do and he does quickly and with instincts.
He may just be a year, or two more off, but he may just be what the Dr ordered also, given the chance.
Yeah, Davis would have been a really nice pickup. I wonder if FO tried to get #31 but Grizz offered more?
It's a good question and interesting alternative scenario, Ruff. Murray has tremendous talent that jumps out and grabs your attention. I'm not sure the turnovers can be reined-in but that will be up to the player development staff and Dejounte's ability to grow and learn. I'm intrigued to see how his future plays out. He's a head-turner.
Also, we don't have much of a view behind the curtain to see what the Spurs FO has brewing in free agency and trade scenarios. I still remember Sam Presti with the Spurs working a 3-way trade with Sac and Indy where Danny Ferry signed up for his final year, was traded (Spurs received Hedo Turkoglu and Mercer) and then retired 2 months later before the season started and became a front office guy. That could happen with Timmy if he wants to retire. Now, the Turkoglu experiment didn't quite work out but it was initially exciting and was a really smart trade. Who knows? This may end up being a pretty nice offseason when all is said and done. 'Hope so!
As a player, Murray is more in the mould of Ginobili than Parker, i.e. with an unpredictable style and an ability to slash into the heart of a defence to either score or create for others. The Spurs have always found a way to overcome Parker's disappearance, but not Manu's.
If the Spurs intend to hang on to Parker, they may have already planned on working around his glaring weaknesses, such as benching him and trading defence for offence by throwing out a bunch of cheap 3-point shooters in Arcidiacono and Forbes such as when GSW inevitably makes Parker unplayable.
Even though everyone has him pegged as Tony's successor, he could just as easily be the team's next starting SG or Manu's successor.
If his game is in fact like Jamal Crawford's then i would much rather see him playing the 2 and finding Tony's heir apparent elsewhere.
Basketball is perimeter oriented. So having the chance to get an Elite PG trumps an elite big. I liked jones a lot too. But Murray has a lot of excitement about him too.
Thanks Solid D. Nice to see you weighing in.
I remember the Hedo trade - thought it was excellent at the time - but then he rarely played well for us, and nor did Mercer, and that 2004 season ended in 0.4sec. Perhaps better forgotten!
LMAO... from the guy with the "Dub Nation" cartoon as his sig.Thoughts? Your handle is gay as
I watched Damian Jones play several games last season. The truth is, he's not very good at anything at this point, except being tall and having a pretty high-revving engine. He's going to have to put in some time in the weight room to be able to hold his own against NBA bigs, but that's pretty typical of bigs his age. But the worst thing is that he tore a pectoral muscle, and just had it operated on. From what I heard, he basically had an avulsion fracture - which is where the tendon is torn off the bone. (I guess it's technically only an avulsion fracture if it tears off a chunk of bone with it.) In his case, it sounds like the tendon may have torn off the bone cleanly. That's still a nasty little injury, and he's going to be doing some extended rehab. With all the pushing and pulling that goes on in the low post, a torn pec is something that has to completely heal before he starts wrestling with other giants.
I think he's got the athleticism, and probably the drive, to turn into a serviceable big. But it's not going to happen this season, and probably not next. The Spurs need some help in the middle sooner than that. I don't think you're wrong for wondering if he would have been good for the Spurs. I think he would - just not soon enough. His energy makes him look like he could be one of those kids who comes in and starts giving good minutes with the backups. But I think he would get lit up by veteran NBA bigs for a while. And that injury is going to keep him from proving anything, at least for a while.
BTW - the one trade-up I wish the Spurs would have pulled off was for Denzel Valentine. I predicted he would go at #14, and that's exactly where he went. Some of the trade-ups to #2 or #3 that people were talking about were never realistic. But I think they could have gotten to 14.
I know everyone wants freakish athletes, but he would have been so good in the Spurs' system. To me, he's the one that got away this year. I don't know - maybe it would have been too costly to have gotten there, but I would have loved to see him in silver and black.
I was never sold on Diallo, and thought he was over-hyped. The Clippers traded him for a pair of second round picks - David Michineau and Diamond Stone.
Not against this, main concern is Murrays lay ups look like they'd all get swatted in the NBA every ing time, and it seems to be a big part of his game.
Haven't seen heaps of him tho
PATFO may have been put off by Valentine's inability to defend.
Anyway, the Spurs may have been eyeing Deandre Bembry, another guy who can play and defend positions 1 through 3.
Too bad the Hawks snagged him first.
Among the big men, no one particularly stood out. Poeltl may have been the highest ranked, but he struggled against elite size, and was even dominated by the smaller Sabonis. Jones, Diallo and Onuaku are extremely limited. Only Hammons have shown flashes of dominance on both ends, doing classic big man stuff and even stepping out to hit 3-pointers at a decent clip in his senior year. We'll see how he pans out with the Mavs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
