FBI Clinton investigation - Comey delivers statement

[TheSanityAnnex]

The high IQ voter can't consciously vote for her OR Trump, tbh...

Quite the pickle. But I hate Hillary too much to stay at home, and Trumps a dip so it's tough.

[Reck]

Do you think honestly think Lynch would have indicted had he recommended it? Do you think Obama would have allowed that considering he was actively campaigning with her as the sitting President? Can you name the last sitting President to do that?

Dude it doesn't matter whether Obama would have intervined. Had Comey reccomended indictment she would have been finsihed.

Look at what's happening now. She's already being exposed as a serial liar and her trustworthness will not recovered. Comey did as much damage as he could and this will probably reflect in the polls soon.

Imagine what a reccomendation to indict would have meant and then have Obama say, never mind. It would be a disaters of epic proportion.

And the reason why she'll probably win the presidency will be because she's going against Trump.

You don't with the guy who appointed you and you do as he says, pretty simple.

Comey is a dirty republican. He doesn't care what Obama has to say.

Just read up on Comey's history when he was AG.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Dude it doesn't matter whether Obama would have intervined. Had Comey reccomended indictment she would have been finsihed.

Look at what's happening now. She's already being exposed as a serial liar and her trustworthness will not recovered. Comey did as much damage as he could and this will probably reflect in the polls soon.

Imagine what a reccomendation to indict would have meant and then have Obama say, never mind. It would be a disaters of epic proportion.

And the reason why she'll probably win the presidency will be because she's going against Trump.

Rabid Clinton defenders like yourself (her base) could give two s if she was indicted, and would still vote for her.

[ElNono]

Quite the pickle. But I hate Hillary too much to stay at home, and Trumps a dip so it's tough.

Like you voting red was ever in doubt (and don't take that as admonishing you, it's your right and that's fine by me).

I'm gonna do what I always do: go to the office and do some work, make some bucks and catch the soap opera later on. I don't buy into the lesser of two evils BS. Frankly, neither of those two are going to do for me anyways, so they're really not worth my time.

[Reck]

Rabid Clinton defenders like yourself (her base) could give two s if she was indicted, and would still vote for her.

You seem abit rabid yourself. You're coming undone.

Her base of voters wouldn't be enough to elect her. The majority wouldn't if she was to be indicted.

Also read

You don't with the guy who appointed you and you do as he says, pretty simple.

Comey is a dirty republican. He doesn't care what Obama has to say.

Just read up on Comey's history when he was AG.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Like you voting red was ever in doubt (and don't take that as admonishing you, it's your right and that's fine by me).

I'm gonna do what I always do: go to the office and do some work, make some bucks and catch the soap opera later on. I don't buy into the lesser of two evils BS. Frankly, neither of those two are going to do for me anyways, so they're really not worth my time.

Last time I cast a vote for President it was for Clinton.

[boutons_deux]

Ryan formally asks DNI to block Clinton's access to classified info

House Speaker Paul Ryan sent a letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Wednesday requesting he deny any classified information to Hillary Clinton for the rest of the 2016 campaign.

After FBI Director James Comey called Clinton's handling of classified material "extremely careless," Ryan argued in an interview on Fox on Tuesday that the Democratic nominee shouldn't be permitted to get top secret briefings, but the letter formalizes that recommendation.

Ryan cites his own experience receiving classified intelligence briefings as his party's vice presidential nominee in 2012 in his letter, saying he understands Clinton is set to begin getting similar briefings after her party formally nominates her at the Democratic convention later this month.

"There is no legal requirement for you to provide Secretary Clinton with classified information, and it would send the wrong signal to all those charged with safeguarding our nation's secrets if you choose to provide her access to this information despite the FBI's findings," Ryan write

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/07/politi...inkId=26297625

[Spurminator]

Like you voting red was ever in doubt (and don't take that as admonishing you, it's your right and that's fine by me).

I'm gonna do what I always do: go to the office and do some work, make some bucks and catch the soap opera later on. I don't buy into the lesser of two evils BS. Frankly, neither of those two are going to do for me anyways, so they're really not worth my time.

There are about 100 other things and candidates to vote on in an election, and your vote matters more for each of those than it does for the Presidential vote.

[Reck]

Ryan formally asks DNI to block Clinton's access to classified info

House Speaker Paul Ryan sent a letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Wednesday requesting he deny any classified information to Hillary Clinton for the rest of the 2016 campaign.

After FBI Director James Comey called Clinton's handling of classified material "extremely careless," Ryan argued in an interview on Fox on Tuesday that the Democratic nominee shouldn't be permitted to get top secret briefings, but the letter formalizes that recommendation.

Ryan cites his own experience receiving classified intelligence briefings as his party's vice presidential nominee in 2012 in his letter, saying he understands Clinton is set to begin getting similar briefings after her party formally nominates her at the Democratic convention later this month.

"There is no legal requirement for you to provide Secretary Clinton with classified information, and it would send the wrong signal to all those charged with safeguarding our nation's secrets if you choose to provide her access to this information despite the FBI's findings," Ryan write

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/07/politi...inkId=26297625

While letting Trump have access to it.

[Th'Pusher]

Theories are theories. To me they're fun to toss around but I can't read like this with a straight face

"Because there was no evidence of intentional mishandling, disloyalty, or obstruction of justice that would hold up in court"

Do I need to dismantle this quote 1 by 1 or can you just accept how fraud doesn't your claim is?

Do whatever you like. Comey said basically the same thing before congress today. There was no evidence she knowingly did anything wrong and they would not be able to successfully prosecute her...

[FromWayDowntown]

I'm sure Hillary's housekeeper has intermingled trash and recycling and that Hillary probably didn't do anything to stop that.

Perhaps congressional republicans should look into that next.

[Reck]

The hearing was a massive waste of time. They got nothing out of Comey.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Do whatever you like. Comey said basically the same thing before congress today. There was no evidence she knowingly did anything wrong and they would not be able to successfully prosecute her.

Are you claiming she didn't know scrubbing top secret classification and sending non secure was wrong?

[angrydude]

Hillary is either a criminal, and has no business being president, or she's dangerously stupid and incompetent, in which case she has no business being President.

[pgardn]

Trump is either a criminal, and has no business being president, or he is dangerously stupid and incompetent, in which case he has no business being President.

Goes for both.

Also both are liars. I would say lying is much easier for Trump as he lies about both important and innocuous subjects. Hillary tends to lie on important matters.

[Th'Pusher]

Are you claiming she didn't know scrubbing top secret classification and sending non secure was wrong?

That's the 3rd time you've posted this email is this thread alone. I'm interested to know why you think it's so important.

[TheSanityAnnex]

That's the 3rd time you've posted this email is this thread alone. I'm interested to know why you think it's so important.

Are you claiming she didn't know scrubbing top secret classification and sending non secure was wrong?

[boutons_deux]

When Repugs tried to trash Hillary, her ratings went up.

We'll see how her ratings do after the Repugs went after Comey and the mainly popular FBI (60% approval).

Trash is totally out of control, off script, off message, and so is his campaign. Trash is mentally disordered, a grifter, a fraud, a crook.

Just ask the 100s if not 1000s of suppliers he stiffed.

He pocketed $160M as his totally mismanaged casinos, trashed by his ignorance of the business, went bankrupt, as other casinos did OK.

[Th'Pusher]

Are you claiming she didn't know scrubbing top secret classification and sending non secure was wrong?

What secure information was in the email?

[TheSanityAnnex]

What secure information was in the email?

Irrelevant what the classified information was, she instructed him to scrub classification and send non secure. Stop dodging, did she not know this was wrong?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Will be interesting to see if they can get her on perjury for lying to congress under oath, which Comey said she did.

[Th'Pusher]

Irrelevant what the classified information was, she instructed him to scrub classification and send non secure. Stop dodging, did she not know this was wrong?

We do not know that the information in the email was classified. What we do know is that the email contained talking points which are generally used for unclassified purposes and that it is not uncommon for non classified do ents to be crafted and shared on a classified system.

Now what evidence do you have that the email contained classified information? especially in light of the fact that Comey had access to the email and explicitly said that Clinton did not intentionally share classified information.

Your inability to reason is making me think you may be slightly re ed.

[TheSanityAnnex]

We do not know that the information in the email was classified. What we do know is that the email contained talking points which are generally used for unclassified purposes and that it is not uncommon for non classified do ents to be crafted and shared on a classified system.

Now what evidence do you have that the email contained classified information? especially in light of the fact that Comey had access to the email and explicitly said that Clinton did not intentionally share classified information.

Your inability to reason is making me think you may be slightly re ed.

Calling me re ed when they are clearly discussing a fax and not an email you keep referring to lol.

[Th'Pusher]

Calling me re ed when they are clearly discussing a fax and not an email you keep referring to lol.

She asked that the talking points be sent non secure. Are talking points generally classified? Is it reasonable to assume the talking points while not clasified were crafted and shared on a secure system requiring secure fax for transmission?

Now, what information do you have that the talking points in question were classified?

ive answered all your questions. Now answer mine.

[TheSanityAnnex]

She asked that the talking points be sent non secure. Are talking points generally classified? Is it reasonable to assume the talking points while not clasified were crafted and shared on a secure system requiring secure fax for transmission?

Now, what information do you have that the talking points in question were classified?

ive answered all your questions. Now answer mine.

Why ask for the heading to be removed?