I'm sure it is, that's probably why he decided to play in the Olympics too
I'm sure it is, that's probably why he decided to play in the Olympics too
I think he made $14.5M then, tbh... big difference...
Pau's 15M, TP's 14M, Manure's 14M.... We better hope their quests for gold end quickly at the Olympics![]()
I'm supposed to get a cut too, tbh... plus taxes, fees, etc... round it up to $14m...
some people will never get Spurs "culture."
Geef det men hees maaaneeey!
^ one of the gots ing about Parker's 14M for the past 2 years, lol.
Not surprised your got ass is ing about the 2nd best Spur of the Big 3.
Not ing about MVParker, tbh
Why not? This $14m for one year isn't holding up the Spurs from acquiring talent... unlike other deals.
You just implied Tony is numero 3.![]()
One influences the salary cap, one does not.
classhole
He cost us Boban, tbh
Today's signings![]()
![]()
![]()
haters that thought he was going to sign for the minimum
But as Hillary says: What difference does it make? Manu's deal didn't cost the Spurs any players, and it didn't make any difference in the way anything happened. If Manu had signed with someone else, Boban would still be gone and the Spurs would have one roster spot and 2 million bucks to spend.
So pretty much what a few of us thought. The Sixers made the most sense.
Brett Brown throwing that monopoly money.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)