Mr Trump update today obliterates supreme justice Ginsberg, catches Shillary in polls

[spurraider21]

So trump calls her out and insults her... Then she apologizes. Power move

[ducks]

She still has more balls than the entire Repug Congress and the rigthwing hate media.

She speaks the truth, get trashed.

Repugs LIE out of every orifice, and get away with it

she has no balls she a pussy
second of all she said I was wrong so she admitted she made a mistake

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Absolutely.

Tell me what kind of advertising you see that is political in nature?

And when I say you, I assume you understand that some of those adds have come from firms that try to pin down your personal tastes for the magazine.

Pulling a CC and expecting me to support your assertion?

I looked it up to see wehre such claims came from and I found the dailycaller and breitbart making such claims. Sorry man but I don't buy it. FWIW, I also found something saying they were conservative. When I see that it says to me that they are more impartial than most.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Just this morning.
Its always something like this. Are you with Hillary, are you with Bernie (when he was still in)
what kind of ads to you get?

I use adblock and advertisement does not control content. It's a third party who pays for the space and are not indicative of the pubs political leanings.

Conservatives go to Fox News, Breitbart, Drudge and Daily Caller to be spoonfed. That doesn't make everyone else liberal.

[hater]

so after getting her ass handed to her, she apologized to Trump

My god this man is magnificent

[hater]

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she regrets her ill-advised public criticism of Donald Trump. Ginsburg says in a statement issued by the court on Thursday that judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office.

she might as well resign as she has been completely embarrassed and will be remembered in history as Trumps punching bag

[hater]

Why do these idiot so called "experts" keep throwing softballs at Trump?? is batting .459 at this point. Too easy

[spurraider21]

So for the strong conservatives on this board, can you guys provide a list of acceptable news/media sources outside of Fox/brietbart/daily caller/freebeacon

[hater]

So for the strong conservatives on this board, can you guys provide a list of acceptable news/media sources outside of Fox/brietbart/daily caller/freebeacon

I'm no conservative but One America News Network seems pretty decent and they have jumped on Lord Trumps wagon as well

[Reck]

One America News Network seems pretty decent

They are on par with Rasmussen.

[pgardn]

I use adblock and advertisement does not control content. It's a third party who pays for the space and are not indicative of the pubs political leanings.

Conservatives go to Fox News, Breitbart, Drudge and Daily Caller to be spoonfed. That doesn't make everyone else liberal.

The ad I posted is from a liberal group IMO. I have never seen anything close to a Conservative slant ad on this site.
This is clearly a liberal site. There is nothing wrong with it. But call it what it is. Liberal.

So you really don't think Politico leans left? Really?
I totally disagree.

And conservatives going to conservative sites and being spoon fed has nothing to do with my assertion.

[TeyshaBlue]

I dont think it leans left at all...seems pretty straight down the middle to me.

[pgardn]

Pulling a CC and expecting me to support your assertion?

I looked it up to see wehre such claims came from and I found the dailycaller and breitbart making such claims. Sorry man but I don't buy it. FWIW, I also found something saying they were conservative. When I see that it says to me that they are more impartial than most.

Look up who paid for the ad.

Pulling a CC? I don't know wtf that means.

You laughed that I labeled Politico as a liberal leaning site. You think that's wrong. I think the articles and especially the ads make my assertion valid. How would you label Politico? Neutral? I also think that wapo and the nytimes lean left but they are among my favorite papers for good info.

[pgardn]

I dont think it leans left at all...seems pretty straight down the middle to me.

Then why all the ads for Democrats?

Thats all I have ever seen?

So of course I disagree. It does not mean it's a propaganda machine like FOX.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

The ad I posted is from a liberal group. I have never seen anything close to a Conservative slant ad on this site.
This is clearly a liberal site. There is nothing wrong with it. But call it what it is. Liberal.

So you really don't think Politico leans left? Really?
I totally disagree.

And conservatives going to conservative sites and being spoon fed has nothing to do with my assertion.

So you base a sites political leaning by ads instead of by actual content. One of the more asinine things I have read here.

You have anything objective to support this as I said the only thing I heard that claimed this was breitbart and daily caller. You have the ads that are shown to you to support it. Anything else other than your own echo chamber?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Look up who paid for the ad.

Pulling a CC? I don't know wtf that means.

You laughed that I labeled Politico as a liberal leaning site. You think that's wrong. I think the articles and especially the ads make my assertion valid. How would you label Politico? Neutral? I also think that wapo and the nytimes lean left but they are among my favorite papers for good info.

Again the ads are paid for by third parties. Your logic just sucks. Any evidence that they bias what ads they allow or not?

Yes neutral. They have been accused by both sides of being biased towards the other.

[pgardn]

So you base a sites political leaning by ads instead of by actual content. One of the more asinine things I have read here.

You have anything objective to support this as I said the only thing I heard that claimed this was breitbart and daily caller. You have the ads that are shown to you to support it. Anything else other than your own echo chamber?

So you think the ads have nothing to do with the type of readers a site attracts?

Seriously?

[pgardn]

Again the ads are paid for by third parties. Your logic just sucks. Any evidence that they bias what ads they allow or not?

Yes neutral. They have been accused by both sides of being biased towards the other.

Advertising put ads on sites that attract certain types of readers.

During a presidential election and congress I have not seen one Republican add? You don't find this curious?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

So you think the ads have nothing to do with the type of readers a site attracts?

Seriously?

I have no idea what ads they show on aggregate. You handwaving at a personal anecdote is fun and all though. Do you have anything that corroborates your other than this?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Advertising put ads on sites that attract certain types of readers.

During a presidential election and congress I have not seen one Republican add? You don't find this curious?

Again other than personal anecdotes on advertisements do you have anything to support this? You cannot even mention the actual content.

[pgardn]

Again other than personal anecdotes on advertisements do you have anything to support this? You cannot even mention the actual content.

Personal anecdote...

Look up the advertisers on this site and tell me they are not left leaning.

And absolutely yes, advertising follows very closely to clientele. This is a very good way of determine type of reader a site attracts. This ain't rocket science. You don't find hunting advertising on vegan sites.

And yes I consider most of politico liberal leaning yet very informative. Just like the Ny times and Washington post. Even though they are very good IMO. You want me to compile a list of all the articles I have read and point to particular places where an alternative view could be presented?

Yes. I can indeed do this. But you see I, like many others, make generalizations based on years reading stuff. Yes?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Personal anecdote...

Look up the advertisers on this site and tell me they are not left leaning.

And absolutely yes, advertising follows very closely to clientele. This is a very good way of determine type of reader a site attracts. This ain't rocket science. You don't find hunting advertising on vegan sites.

And yes I consider most of politico liberal leaning yet very informative. Just like the Ny times and Washington post. Even though they are very good IMO.

So you still have nothing and are waving your hands at a personal anecdote on advertising. Are you going to make a case on the actual news reporting of the site or you going to continue to try this brain-dead backdoor approach?

Think what you want in your own echo chamber. What do you see as an objective site then? You just seem to be spouting the Fox News marketing campaign about the 'liberal media' which boils down to anything not them.

[TeyshaBlue]

Personal anecdote...

Look up the advertisers on this site and tell me they are not left leaning.

And absolutely yes, advertising follows very closely to clientele. This is a very good way of determine type of reader a site attracts. This ain't rocket science. You don't find hunting advertising on vegan sites.

And yes I consider most of politico liberal leaning yet very informative. Just like the Ny times and Washington post. Even though they are very good IMO. You want me to compile a list of all the articles I have read and point to particular places where an alternative view could be presented?

Yes. I can indeed do this. But you see I, like many others, make generalizations based on years reading stuff. Yes?

The ads or the alledged "clientele" didnt write the articles. Jeebus.

[SnakeBoy]

Trump is going to stumble into the oval office if the rest of the summer is anything like the last month or so.

[pgardn]

The ads or the alledged "clientele" didnt write the articles. Jeebus.

Of course not. But are you going to advertise for Bernie in the Drudge report.

Seriously, looking closely what ads are used in sites tells one a lot about the READERS.

So. Why no Republican ads? Not for senate house nothing? Plenty for Democrats. You don't think this indicates anything? Seriously? And do you think wapo and nytimes are more left leaning? We may just have a different definition of liberal and conservative. I am from Texas so, there's that...