Reply With Quote
Why would he lut Iverson, jackass.
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/pau...-ever-guarded/
He had:
Kobe
Tmac
Carter
Lebron
Melo
Not sure if it was in any sort of order but hard to argue with that list. Surprised iverson wasn't there, but maybe Pierce didn't really guard iverson that much.
Why would he lut Iverson, jackass.
For someone professing he cannot stand a lack of logic this comment takes the cake!
Of course it's hard to argue with that list or any other list Pierce might have come up with regardless of who's on it. There is absolutely NO argument that can be made. NONE. It's his personal experience.
If he lists tony Allen then he's a re . You re .
If he lists Tony Allen, Smush Parker, Spd Webb, etc... It doesn't mean he's a re . It has nothing to do with mental capability at all. It simply means that he had found difficulty guarding them. Again, for someone who says he can't stand a lack of logic this is baffling. Your comment above defies all logic.
And you call me a re ? Priceless!!!
It would be highly questionable. Do you know what arguable means? I would question the integrity of his list.If he lists Tony Allen, Smush Parker, Spd Webb, etc... It doesn't mean he's a re . It has nothing to do with mental capability at all. It simply means that he had found difficulty guarding them. Again, for someone who says he can't stand a lack of logic this is baffling. Your comment above defies all logic.
And you call me a re ? Priceless!!!
Yes I do know what it means. Questionable? You would question the integrity of his list? Like he's lying? So because he may find someone hard to guard that doesn't check your box on hard to guard players you would call it re ed? Seriously?
AMB: Hey , what was your hardest subject in high school.
Person: English literature. Had a real difficult time with it.
AMB: That's re ed! Everyone knows math is the toughest.
Person: Well, for me it was english lit.
AMB: Well, your answer is highly questionable.
BRILLIANT!!!!!
nailed it tbh..
Why not? He is a public personality, he doesn't want any backlash, he wants to discredit certain players he didn't like, there could be lots of reasons. Like Phil Jackson does time and again.
Only subjects are ranked by difficulty by the general public.
Here's a more apt comparison.
cobbler: I am a re
everyone: I agree.
BTW, Dale, are you going to respond to my questions? You chicken .
I am going to keep bumping that thread you are trying to bump daily, reminding how shrewd a business man Duncan is.
If that truly were the case it would be...
everyone: "we" agree.
Do you not know the difference between singular and plural?
Again... BRILLIANT!!!!
Ambchang getting bullied by a cripple
Everyone can say individually "I agree". Can't imagine how that could pass your amazing "logic skills".If that truly were the case it would be...
everyone: "we" agree.
Do you not know the difference between singular and plural?
Again... BRILLIANT!!!!
Touché, I'll give you that one. And I never said I had amazing logic skills AMB. Your imagining things in your head yet again. I have only stated your lack thereof. Which I might add is overwhelmingly evident as I have perused some of your rants with many others here over the last few days. You are very sensitive guy. Well, if you are a guy. I don't know you. Maybe it's that time of the month? And boy do you have an almost unhealthy obsession with all things Kobe. I cannot imagine spending so much of my life ranting about any one particular individual. Life is way too short to be obsessing over some sports star. Yikes!!
Ambchang getting bodied by a cripple..
Tbh...Ambchang getting bullied by a cripple
Why are all the Laker fans suddenly so active?Ambchang getting bodied by a cripple..
And also, how so?
I have shown quite clearly that people can argue over individual lists. Hidden agendas and political reasons often sways public announcements of individual preferences, especially in sports figures.
For example, Tiger Woods often publicly showed his affection for his wife earlier in his career, and yet after the incident, it was found that he was quite active sexually with many different partners. So his list of women was previously publicly only 1 person, but then turned out to be many. Same with Jordan, same with Kobe.
Barkley and Iverson were really one of the rare ones that say what they think, as far as we can tell.
I am surprised you guys are that gullible.
And in terms of saying the "I agree" "We agree" bit.
An instructor asked a class of 5 people whether they agree Kate Upton is hot. Without any discussions, the 5 people individually said "I agree".
The lesson to you guys though, don't side with a cripple, because it makes you look like him.
Last edited by ambchang; 07-16-2016 at 10:11 PM.
You don't know me, and yet you know I have an obsession with Kobe because I spent the last few days arguing with you Spurs vs. Lakers, Jordan vs. Duncan, and the importance of repeats? How does that work? And you spent exactly the same amount of time arguing the same topics with me the last few days, so you can imagine just fine, you are living it yourself.
Life is way too short to be obsessing over some guy you don't know over the internet. Yikes!!
Yep. Amb got too big for britches & Cobby took him apart piece-by-piece.Ambchang getting bullied by a cripple
Yes, because it was brought up by several other posters and a quick 5 minute perusal can clearly prove that. Not to mention that there are quite a few Kobe obsessors here and I have spent enough time over the years here to know that he is more a topic in this forum than any other player. By a long shot! Heck, someone in the threads we were discussing in mentioned he thought you would disappear from the forum when Kobe retired since you were so obsessed.
I'm not obsessed over you AMB. Don't be silly. I have spent a grand total of maybe 2 hours bantering with you. And most likely, unless I see you outright lying and putting words in my mouth as you have over the last two days, I doubt I will have any reason to discuss anything with you again simply because nothing you say impresses me and sensitive types get too emotional to carry on a decent conversation. Well, let me take that back a little. I most likely will chime in if i see you implying someone is a re for answering a personal question like "what (pick a topic or subject) was the most difficult for you?" simpley because it doesn't agree with your personal experience.
, never seen an ownage this bad. OP's thread backfired big time, even Spursfan are ting on him
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
