Reply With Quote
Good point. Teams know he's ended up unwanted from the last few teams he's been on.
I just don't know about this random and what it would end up taking to make it a certainty.
Hmmm...
And they have only had him for a year. Detroit let him go and they instantly became better. It's an odd trade that I call bogus (Kidd probably garnering interest by using Spurs).... rather have someone like TGibson who is half the price, plays defensive, and retains flexibility next year.
Good point. Teams know he's ended up unwanted from the last few teams he's been on.
I just don't know about this random and what it would end up taking to make it a certainty.
Hmmm...
lol you're obviously missing the point. the player described is not available for the min nor is there any team willing to trade a player like you described because they would likely be important to their rotation. like I said, Monroe is available because bucks have been trying to trade him for awhile and his stock is low, making him a player that could likely be traded for in theory. spurs would probably need a third team to facilitate or could trade Parker for him. I'm not saying it's a great idea but pointing out that based on what is available he's not a terrible option
i'll take john henson. wanted him since the draft.
Gotcha. I still think, even with a third team involved, that the Spurs will have to give up players to attain salary matches to get this guy.
Giving up Parker is not worth it to me. Giving up Danny is even worse. Someone (somebodies) has to go and tossing out the team's trash is an unreasonable thing to suggest.
So... My point still stands somehow.
They will have to throw in MCW, as well.
Parker I would think is not a bad deal but I don't think spurs will ever trade TP, especially to a team like Milwaukee (they accommodated Diaw) so in a two team trade it seems Green would be gone and yes I definitely think that's a terrible idea.
who knows if spurs can get a third team involved though then things become interesting
The Bucks will not be letting go of Henson anytime soon.
And immediately put him on year long inactive list due to injury
i wouldn't either.
Could become very interesting, for sure.
Doubt anything comes close to anything though. We'll see I guess.
Hey GSH, I'm thinking of seguing from Megaforce to PumaMan. Natural progression...
Well Spurs do need to get another big....Spurs don't have any legit back ups.......Bonner? Don't think so.....Im pretty sure spurs will sign someone.....
A team that I could see trading for him are the Bulls who could offer Robin Lopez/Taj who are better fits for the Bucks.
doesn't Chicago have a time period they have to wait to trade Lopez?
Not a fan..he's a cancer as a starter due to his lack of big man qualities(defense, rebounding, etc) and tendency to be a black hole on offense..he would be great as a bench anchor, though..
Kidd would love Kyle, though..he would be a perfect fit for Milwaukee's approach to the future..
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=jrfllnl
No...Spurs need to get Taj who is a better fit.
I approve of this trade
would rather have taj.
Can we form an online pe ion with this trade linked, gather the required signatures and send it to PATFO?
Damn, looks good.
Parker's going nowhere.
this is why the link was garbage.
Spurs don't have the cap space to absorb Monroe's contract.I approve of this trade
Not surprised to hear SA/Monroe rumors. I brought it up before the draft as a possible candidate but I can see it making some sense even now. Then the logic I had was Tim might come back and SA might be able to absorb that Monroe deal with only sending out abou 7M. Would help them get another big and free up FA cap space for MIL.
There is still some logic even after FA why MIL would want to dump Monroe and why SA might be interested.
Again, like Pau, Monroe is on what looks to be a one-year deal. He has a player option for next year which I think he may not exercise. If you are looking to compete as much as you can this year, need a big man and don't want to mess up long-term flexibility there is none better than Monroe.
Sure, there is some risk (like Pau) that they opt in, but you can't have a perfect scenario. SA needs more big depth (IMO) and fit can't be the big concern; talent is.
If SA can sneak in by giving up someone like Kyle+Filler (not sure if that is even possible - don't think it is) and get a free audition for Pau/Monroe, I see how that makes sense.
Who was the last player we got from Milwaukee?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
