Reply With Quote
Manu from 99-07 was a monster.
I love Manu, but you guys are using all the wrong games to prop him up. Yah, he had a good game 7 (23/4/5), but saying the guy was unstoppable is pretty laughable when even in his best series, he was very stoppable. He didn't even shoot 50% in those Finals. No one's arguing Parker was better in that particular series, Parker had tons of others he was much better than Manu was in those Finals. But yes, that was one of Manu's better series (18.7/4.0/5.9)...he almost scored as much as Duncan that series and was almost as good, which is why he almost won a FMVP.
Manu from 99-07 was a monster.
Lol - it's hard to argue with someone who just compares numbers
Since this has been settled for a long time, even when we had that poll like a year ago and its common knowledge to say Manu is a much better player...
Thread should be called SASdynasty vs Manu Ginobili.
Manu is way better than Sasdynast, Manu dominated sasdynasty for a decade now. Even Tony knows Manu is way better than him and sasdynasty combined.
^ The conversations between Manure s
Parker is better. Has better numbers, individual accomplishments, and has had better longevity over Manure. Swear to god I've never seen a non Spurs fan put Manure as a Top 50 greatest of all time, I've seen it with MVParker.
Anyone who chose Parker is a ing re , the lowest of the lowest in terms of intelligence, and should be pinked, banned, unbanned, unpinked, pinked and banned forever, while forbidden to discuss or express any opinion about basketball online -or anywhere else in the Milky Way- by a judge order and lashed to death by people who suffer Parkinson's because his gotness.
[/ST off-season mode]
Lol, player fans...your name is a giveaway. Parker is a top-50 player. Manu is top-75.
Also, good content in your post. I'll take some time to consider it. Plenty of content & stats, plus you use good logic to make good points.
The only difference being I didn't have the worst game of my career in Game 6 of the Finals.
There's 3 porker s in here and they make up half the replies.
You didn't get outplayed by Mario Chalmers in the Finals either, but your mancrush sure did.
I guess shooting 6 out of 23 doesnt count as the worst game of someone´s career during the same Game 6 of the Finals.
8 Turnovers could mean losing between 16 and 34 points if all those shots are good for the other team.
17 missed shots could mean giving away between 34 and 51 points if the other team counterattacks and scores during all those opportunities.
Even a first grader understands that.
I also remember him being a monster on June 15, 2014!
Even the biggest Porker fans knows things as they are, SASDinasty is reaching new lows, tbh.
Boban's played a fraction of the minutes Manu has. If Boban can keep it up over years, at 20+ minutes a game, he'll be an all-star. Not going to happen though.
Lol:
2013:
Parker: 15.7/6.4 on 41%
Chalmers: 10.6/2.1 on 39%
2014:
Parker: 18.0/4.6 on 48%
Chalmers: 4.4/2.8 on 33%
Hahahahahahaha outplayed!
Hahahaha equating a missed shot with a turnover! Talk about new lows...whatever it takes!
As I said, you are reaching new lows.
Can you imagine if Parker got completely outplayed by his counterpart as bad as Kobe used to outplay Ginobili?
2003 Playoffs:
Kobe: 32.3/5.0/3.7 on 43%
Ginobili: 11.7/3.2/2.5 on 51%
2004 Playoffs:
Kobe: 26.3/6.3/5.8 on 46%
Ginobili: 14.7/6.2/3.7 on 48%
2008 Playoffs:
Kobe: 29.2/5.6/3.8 on 53%
Ginobili: 12.6/3.2/3.0 on 36%
Wow.
Last edited by SASdynasty!; 07-28-2016 at 03:18 PM.
03 and 04 Manu was a bench player and not a star yet in the NBA, how was Kobe his counterpart?
Interesting how much more efficient Manu was, even in his rookie season... it's unfortunate he had a bum ankle in '08, tbh, after basically dragging us past the Hornets with his 26 points in game 7...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
