Reply With Quote
Bill is so charismatic, it almost makes you forget he is part of a family that lies under oath
LOL a values voter cheering a rapistShut the up lib .
Bill is so charismatic, it almost makes you forget he is part of a family that lies under oath
StrengthAndHonor the biggest semen shield on the forum for rapist Kobe but goes nuts about someone hiding getting head from an ugly .
I'm a libcuck male who also identify myself as a struggling woman. Go Hillary. I'm with her
Of all the things to on Bill about: NAFTA, China's most favored nation trade status, running with Greenspan's re ed vision for the economy, repealing Glass-Steagal, the expansion of the prison industrial complex, shutting down the Waxahachie supercollider, failing to get a national healthcare that he campaigned on.. and the right thinks he's evil primarily because he cheated on his ugly of a wife and lied about it.
The right agrees with everything else though... perhaps, in hindsight, China would be the outlier now that they have a candidate that beats China all the time!
StrengthAndHonor the biggest semen shield on the forum for rapist Kobe but goes nuts about someone hiding getting head from an ugly .
Didn't know this. him, and the shrew **** of a wife he rode in on
Clinton is the same asshole Reagan was, though Ronnie couldn't cheat because Nancy's psychic would have known and snitched.
The supercollider being shut down really pissed me off. Texas could have been the center of the scientific world, they would have likely found the Higgs boson 15 years earlier if not for Clinton signing the bill that killed that . It was going to be a much bigger collider than the LHC.
He might be, but he rode a nice economic bubble, tbh... Cuban probably loves him. Also, when you look at what followed, except for Bush Sr, I don't know I wouldn't put him up there over Dubya and HNIC.
That's a pretty low bar to clear.
Though yeah, I'd take Bush 41 over Clinton any day, he is head and shoulders above any recent American president on foreign policy. I'll forever be grateful to him for how he handled the fall of the Berlin Wall so that Gorbachev didn't get overthrown by Communist hardliners who would have started another world war over the prospect of losing East Germany.
That's a pretty low bar to clear.
Yup, also knowing how to get in and out of Iraq without starting the storm his kid eventually started...
41 said this 25 years ago, I don't agree with most of the he did but dammit if he wasn't spot on about this.
Ironically, on the 200th anniversary of our Bill of Rights, we find free speech under assault throughout the United States, including on some college campuses. The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones. It declares certain topics off-limits, certain expression off-limits, even certain gestures off-limits.
What began as a crusade for civility has soured into a cause of conflict and even censorship. Disputants treat sheer force -- getting their foes punished or expelled, for instance -- as a subs ute for the power of ideas.
Throughout history, attempts to micromanage casual conversation have only incited distrust. They have invited people to look for an insult in every word, gesture, action. And in their own Orwellian way, crusades that demand correct behavior crush diversity in the name of diversity.
We all should be alarmed at the rise of intolerance in our land and by the growing tendency to use intimidation rather than reason in settling disputes.
Damn, even Bill is "triggering" some people
What a surprise. Maddog is a man hating . it's amazing MSNBC keeps her around with her abysmal ratings.
What is Maddox's problem? I found the beginning of the speech the best part - very quaint - and what is wrong with being absorbed in one's marriage - that's probably when it was most successful - controversial, shocking, weird? She's the one that's controversial and weird.
1/2 way there. I will set aside my temptation to be snarky to someone I don't agree with, and try for a more constructive tack:
Your posted article made a rather strong claim, and this requires evidence, and some reasonable, logical support.
Claims that laws are violated generally require a bit more than rote recital of the law. Definitions, usage of terms, and tests generally have to be met. The posted article was really thin on what part of the code was violated, and silent on how, which is why I suspect you are having difficulty. I will assume that you read the entire question, but will emphasize the part that requires critical/original thinking:
Which part of that law did the DNC break? Be specific, and tell how it was broken..
I would point out that a long marriage involves commitment, emotional maturity, communication, and compromise, i.e. strong interpersonal skills.
Your chosen candidate is on his third marriage, all arguably rather shallow trophy wives.
(and yes the quote is real)
I made no derogatory comment about the Clintons' marriage - I was complimentary toward Bill's speech - my comments were directed at Maddox. You don't have to lecture me on what a long marriage entails - I already know (and there is a big distinction between a LONG marriage which the Clintons definitely have and a HAPPY one which they probably don't - but that is a still a guess). I am not voting for Trump because of his marriages and imo, a businessman who has been as successful as he has must have strong interpersonal skills. And you are assuming a lot - that beautiful women are shallow - isn't that sexist?
You sound like a lovely person
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
