There you go
#AllInForMcGeeOrKaman
There you go
He cucked the Duds last season in his revenge game:
For Dedmon I was referring to him playing well and SA losing him because he gets a bigger pay day..
Boban all over again...![]()
It depends on how he's primarily utilized. If it's as the backup power forward, Dedmon can only either roll or play in the "dunker" spot. Whichever of the two would be in the latter, with likely Anderson as one of the two spot up guys, teams would easily strangle the life out of the pick-and-roll.
This is why I think he might be more so insurance, for two reasons. 1) Aldridge/Gasol/Ginobili injury/rest games, 2) Dedmon/Anderson not being good enough for regular rotation minutes or Simmons/Bertans not being good enough for fringe rotation minutes.
It's the 14th guaranteed player, but it's not the 14th man. They probably hope he doesn't have to be more than 10th-11th, but he has a chance to rise as high as 7th.
He'll more than likely opt out so long as he doesn't suffer a significant injury. That's why most veterans on minimum deals have a player option: For insurance.
And do what though? Salary cap rises even more next year so it's going to be slim pickings x2. If Lee has a big year, it would be nice to have the assurance that he'd be back. Of course, if he has a bad season, the Spurs can waive him outright. However, the Spurs gave themselves no options with this contract. I wouldn't be shocked to see Pau and Dedmon opt out too giving the Spurs even less wiggle room.
I remember that. He had a double-double too.
you David Lee.
You and Gasol times a thousand,
and you still couldn't replace TD.
Both > Manure
Better than re-signing Bonner, tbh.
If he plays that great then you make an effort to re sign him.
I fail to see how a minimum contract gives the team "zero options" its minimum. Also if Dedmon and Gasol have good years theyll want to cash in. Not that hard to see.
Well sure, but that might not be possible like with Boban. If SA has goals for a max type player next year, might be a casualty.
It's what it is and nothing to fret over, but something to watch for as the 2nd year option works both ways and can hurt the Spurs losing people (although, if it's what SA had to do, then so be it).
Different scenario. Dedmon wouldn't have signed for that little without the player option.
I'd rather have Bonner tbh...
Spurs really needed a backup PF. I mean, the bench bigs can't get any worse. At least David Lee is a proven NBA player.
Lee is worse of a defender than West. During his prime and now. It is not arguable.
Yeah. You nailed it.
Lee's prime numbers came when he played center for the Knicks. His game revolved around speed. He could take any center off the dribble and get pass them for his nifty close game. He had an okay triple threat mid range as well which made defenders crowed him. Those years are loooong gone. Now he plays PF. Just too small to defend legit centers, not strong enough to keep them at bay, and isn't fast enough to get pass them on the other end. So he must play the 4 most times. It would be another West situation if he plays some 5.
This is the correct answer. Though we lose whatever three point threat that Bonner still represented.
And we need three-point shooters. Last year was proof of that.
Your takes are garbage. Fook off clown.
Are you saying Lee > Diaw is a lie?!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)