I challenge you to find one post on here of me supporting Trump.
Original thought from bonnerific in 3...2..1...
I challenge you to find one post on here of me supporting Trump.
It's funny their "method" accurately predicted 2004, since the site was actually created in 2008...
Domain Name: LONGROOM.COM
...
Creation Date: 31-jan-2008
Expiration Date: 31-jan-2017
damn, you beat me to it![]()
I doubt Cruz would be doing any better tbh. Now if Romney would have run I think he would have been the favorite this time around.
Trump can turn this around with a good debate and stay on message tell the debate
Hillary can extend this lead with a good debate and stay on message tell the debate
Kasich wins this one easily, tbh... even maybe fatso Christie...
But you are the one running around posting made up polls and trying to make Trump look good.
You don't have to support him to to want him to win.
And you continue to be a hopeless dumbass. The emails leaks won't decide the presidency. People already have a ty view of Hillary and don't trust her. But they like Trump even less.
but but the next batch of emails will definitely put her in jail.
![]()
Rubio would easily beat her as well. Jeb would be running even. Walker would be trailing a couple of points but within striking distance.
Those polls don't make Trump look good and they aren't made up dip .
Seething.![]()
... it would have been closer, but his tax returns and his 47% and his total absence from politics since 2012, plus being a P/E predator would have killed him.
The ignorant Repug base has finally realized that it has been ed by Repug/VRWC/1% policies for decades so no establishment Repug 1%er like Willard would be supported.
speaking of P/E, P/E is apparently buying up San Antonio's Rackspace, taking it private.
P/E, in standard fashion, is going to extract $100Ms from Rackspace, load it up with debt, then sell it along as cash cow to other P/E, or bankrupt it.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-05-2016 at 07:22 AM.
Maybe on Kasich, no shot in for Christie though. No way American voters would elect a fat bas .
How the Trump Presidential Campaign is Affecting Trump Businesses
https://medium.com/foursquare-direct...c03#.59joofcee
Will Donald Trump Sink Republicans in Senate Races?
Republicans have become increasingly alarmed at the prospect that Trump may be a major liability for several GOP senators up for re-election.
While many GOP Senate seats were already in play before Trump became the nominee, the polarizing candidate at the top of the ticket makes it harder for GOP Senate candidates facing voters in November.
"That's the reality," former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said Thursday.
"Candidates have to answer for whatever issues they need to deal with in their state.
They don't want layered on top of that the latest musings of a highly controversial presidential nominee.
You don't want the microphone stuck in your face asking you about that, too," said Steele.
"They just can't afford to have the extra baggage on what is already a difficult re-elect."
The presidential contest always plays an enormous role in how Americans cast their votes in "down-ballot" races for Senate, governor, Congress, city council, and so on.
If a voter chooses a party's presidential candidate, research shows, that voter will probably stick with that party all the way down the ballot.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/will-trump-sink-republicans-senate-races-n622991?cid=sm_fb_lastword
Trash as "extra baggage", the dumpster fire sucking up all the oxygen, for state and local Repug campaigners.
This is what happens when a black man goes to a Trump rally alone
http://fusion.net/story/280795/donald-trump-dayton-rally/
The Repug base is deeply racist, and has been implicitly, dog-whistle-y, pandered to, cultivated by Repugs for 50+ years.
Trash's explicit racist demagoguing has exposed the racist Repug voters who Repugs have lied about, saying they didn't exist.
"Party of Lincoln!"
holy
exposed the racist Repug voters who Repugs have lied about, saying they didn't exist.
obviously not the same but similar to how a lot of young democrats scoffed at being called socialists only to swoon over sanders. and no, i'm not saying its a bad trait like racism, just referring to the denial
Bernie isn't marxist/leninist socialist, but a social democrat, so supporting Bernie and his platform/issues, while denying being socialist, is perfectly correct.
Democrats wary of post-convention bounce
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/04/politi...nce/index.html
Clinton up in Georgia![]()
did they altanta?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)