Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38
  1. #26
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    Good thing or bad thing?;

    I know Splits gives you the business for being against the black man, but I read your "racism" as tongue-in-cheek. I think you sympathize with the black man's struggle. You wept for Magic and defend Kobe like a Doberman. And Jim Brown was your boyhood hero.

  2. #27
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    Good thing or bad thing?;

    I know Splits gives you the business for being against the black man, but I read your "racism" as tongue-in-cheek. I think you sympathize with the black man's struggle. You wept for Magic and defend Kobe like a Doberman. And Jim Brown was your boyhood hero.
    It was the white man's game.

    & anyway, why should I entertain you, Midst? You never reciprocate. You take. You never give.

  3. #28
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    It was the white man's game.

    & anyway, why should I entertain you, Midst? You never reciprocate. You take. You never give.
    Not looking for entertainment. Looking for honest discussion.

    I think you get a bad rap as a Trump supporting racist. I think you play up the bitter old white man shtick to piss off Splits.

  4. #29
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    Not looking for entertainment. Looking for honest discussion.

    I think you get a bad rap as a Trump supporting racist. I think you play up the bitter old white man shtick to piss off Splits.
    Forget it, Midst.

  5. #30
    SeaGOAT midnightpulp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,061
    Forget it, Midst.
    I'm siding you, Gd'it!

  6. #31
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Pelicans
    Post Count
    15,822
    Another day, another mention of me. Still living in your head. Love it.

  7. #32
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    81,091
    16 NBA World les ain't nothin' to sneeze at.
    If that's your goal. Just five more and you're there.

  8. #33
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    81,091
    It was the white man's game.

    & anyway, why should I entertain you, Midst? You never reciprocate. You take. You never give.
    What a selfish lover he is.

  9. #34
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    81,091
    Then the Celtics followed it up by slapping the Lakers on their home court the next season!


  10. #35
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    81,091
    ^^^
    Classic. Denying the LA Lakers their first championship on their own court.

  11. #36
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    101,216
    West was a chucker something fierce.

    Cousy was ahead of his time, though. A lot of his passing a en looks modern.

    Manu-style shovel pass in traffic:



    Nash-style pass in the lane:



    Another Manu-esque pass:



    Cousy should be highly respected by any basketball fan since he pretty much created the modern PG style as we know it today, innovating ball handling and passing like no player before him. Pistol Pete and even Magic get a lot "credit" for skills Cousy first innovated.
    today's NBA

  12. #37
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,423
    Yea, I could see Cousy being an all-star in today's game. He'd shoot better with the better ball. Sam Jones would probably be, too. He was a scorer with a pure stroke.
    Better ball? Interesting. I've never heard or read anything about the ball making a difference. How was it different back then?

  13. #38
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    81,091
    Better ball? Interesting. I've never heard or read anything about the ball making a difference. How was it different back then?
    Heavier and harder. Shooting percentages, especially from distance were drastically down. I don't remember all the specifics. Might've been a harder leather that wore out faster than the fancy synthetics of today.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •