Reply With Quote
Whining about optics then defending a guy who alluded to Clinton getting assassinated to stop her AFTER she's elected
Ive been calling hater a pussy for months, not days. And my bets are directly related to his predictions, because he posts daily about Trump poll or election victories yet refuses to back it up with anything but emojis. I've made plenty of predictions about objective data points, feel free to take up any of them.
Whining about optics then defending a guy who alluded to Clinton getting assassinated to stop her AFTER she's elected
So please explain how this concept would be used to prevent Hillary or SCOTUS from acting? I would imagine it involves using a gun, somehow. Please enlighten me
And my bet is directly related to you mocking the attendance at a Trump rally that hadn't even started. Am I wrong to assume after your post you think Hillary gets better turnouts?
The bet still stands. Or do you think Hillary gets far less turnout at her rally's?
Meh, I don't take anything he says at face value. Anyone paying attention already knows not to.
That was my thought process when he announced he was running for president, tbh
I would think gun rights proponents would be falling all over themselves to denounce Trump's comments instead of defending the comments. A Presidential candidate implied, joking or not, that they would be willing and capable of assassinating his opponent.
Where are all of the good guys with guns telling us how wrong he is?
Trump is +300 odds
It was +180 two weeks ago.
It was a 4 point game at halftime, now Hillary has a 15 point lead in the 3rd quarter
Former Dem Sen. Joe Lieberman Could Endorse Trump
I took it as a call for 100 million gun owners to get out and vote to stop Clinton. Others took it as a call to rise against a tyrannical government trying to take away their guns. If you watch the entire speech, and know how ty Trump puts his thoughts to spoken words I think it's the former.
A Presidential candidate's speech shouldn't have to require such detailed parsing.
I didn't read it because I don't really care, it has absolutely no impact on my vote.
If you truly believe he was calling for someone to kill her sure, of course it would involve a gun.
Rally attendance is subjective. I've also never claimed that Shill turns out more than Trump.
hater, on the other hand, has predicted Trump will win the election, will be ahead in the polls after the first debate, will "take the gloves off and she'll never recover" etc etc. When PA was tied, I offered him Trump +5 in the GA and he still wouldn't take it. Every crap prediction he makes, I offer a bet. But he won't take any of them because he's a pussy and/or doesn't believe his own posting.
He makes ridiculous predictions to try to get a rise, I call him out to put his money where his mouth is, he backs down. Rinse repeat.
Feel free to make an objective prediction, and I'll decide whether or not I agree with you.
Here, I'll start: Shill will beat Trump by over 100 electoral college votes. Loser can't post in the political forum until 2017.
Next time you guys post an article about the tweets of random protestors, ask yourselves if you're holding them to a higher standard than the leading GOP candidate for President of the United States, and then ask yourself why that would be.
But everyone needs to watch the entire "interview" to understand the context?
Pick a lane.
Why ask what gun owners think if you won't read it in its entirety and don't care?
Take a bet pussy. Attendance numbers are easily verifiable.
I'm just surprised gun owners, knowing that most people will read the comment supposedly taken out of context, and knowing how sensitive the discussion of gun rights is in the current political climate, aren't more concerned about the comment itself than about whether everybody is considering the full context and best possible interpretation of the comment.
I don't make the same claims hater does and have never predicted a Trump victory. I decline your bet.
Explain in to me why you posted the picture of the pre-Trump rally if not to mock his turnout?
Maybe I'm not most gun owners and at this point just really don't give a . As a Californian I have my gun rights trampled yearly, I'm used to it now and am firmly in the will not comply camp.
I posted it to mock his turnout.
It is one of his main rallying cries. In recent weeks he has booked venues he knows are too small, then goes off on the fire marshall that people aren't allowed in.
Shill does no such thing. If she did, I wouldat her as well.
Gotta run. Splits take my bet, we'll just make until next Monday.
Peace.
How many were at that Shill rally?
Oh I'm not pinning all of this on you. I'm wondering when we're going to hear from the NRA or anyone else of influence in the Gun Rights community with the same hysteria that follows any comment on guns by the current President. Not even Obama has suggested that 2nd Amendment advocates are POTUS assassins.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions