That's basically it. I mean there's the whole "he can do whatever he wants". Yeah, we get it (wink wink). But that year TD had .4 eliminating a B2B followed by settling for a bronze medal. You know there's still butthurt in there.
What? That 's no secret. Tim flat out said he hated FIBA and was pissed after his Olympic experience.
That's basically it. I mean there's the whole "he can do whatever he wants". Yeah, we get it (wink wink). But that year TD had .4 eliminating a B2B followed by settling for a bronze medal. You know there's still butthurt in there.
Dabom/Fkla, who signed your last paycheck? I'd bet $500 it's the US Government, someone in the top 1%, or you are unemployed. China and Russia would love to have additional socialist support. That's where you want to be or in Detroit.
Source?
double beta trying to pull off a relegation quip.![]()
That's a bunch of BS. I live in Cali. Dems have been raping the sh** out of citizens here for the last quarter century.
FIBA sucks. Brazil is a toilet.
What does Parker have to do with Duncan turning down Obama's invitation?
Pro-Democrat group says 9 of the 10 poorest states are Republican
http://www.politifact.com/rhode-isla...states-are-re/
"Ultimately, each measure of the poorest states has its drawbacks. But the supplemental poverty measure offers a reason to temper the evidence from traditional measures that demonstrate the statement to be True. For that reason, we rule the "9 in 10" claim Mostly True."
![]()
Don't go boxing without arms bro.![]()
Brah, if you can't find something to say, I'd say to just lay low on this one. It's a lost battle. Pick your fights better.
Drop in the bucket compared to Bush
$19.4 trillion is the current national debt, you are welcome grandchildren. Bush sucked, Obama made him look extremely frugal. Democrat leadership for you. Without Republicans thwarting we'd basically be Russia
You must want another Clinton in office then.![]()
Anyone who talks about the National debt doesn't know how it works tbh.
I can't educate every ing fool in here.
And keep moving the talking points after you get owned in every one.![]()
Another bible hugger here - Trump didn't run on a traditional Conservative, "bible-based" platform (say like Cruz) but as a populist/nationalist. This is what I say to my Christian friends - hold your nose and think SUPREME COURT.
Trump on the Separation of Powers: Judges Sign Bills
9:29 AM, FEB 29, 2016 | By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON
During the last Republican presidential debate in Texas, Donald Trump spoke of his sister, a liberal activist judge who he says would make a “phenomenal" Supreme Court justice, and defended her against criticism she has received "for signing a certain bill"—his words—from the bench. He then said his sister wasn't the only judge who had "signed that bill"; more than one judge had "signed that bill."
If Trump becomes president, it could prove a bit embarrassing if he says something like, "Justice Antonin Scalia was a really terrific judge who did an amazing job of signing bills"—or if Trump says that he has chosen his new nominee to fill Scalia's seat because he or she would make "an incredible bill-signer." (Some might even mistakenly think that Trump has nominated someone to fill his own position, since the Cons ution grants bill-signing power to the president.)
To avoid such embarrassment, Trump might want to set aside some time on day-one of his presidency to watch this helpful instructional video, which explains how bills get signed into law (hint: not by judges):
Conservative Legal Scholars Prefer A Liberal Supreme Court To A President Trump
“The court is important, to be sure ― but not nearly that important,” said retired Temple University Law School Professor David Post, who now writes for the conservative website the Volokh Conspiracy. “With all due respect to my colleagues who might feel differently, this one strikes me as a no-brainer.” The next president might end up only filling a single seat on the court, Post said. “The idea that it makes sense to trade a single justice for all of Trump’s terrible baggage ― his bullying, his ignorance, his appalling tendency to shoot his mouth off without thinking, and all the rest of it ― strikes me as thoroughly preposterous,” he added.
Ilya Somin, who teaches law at George Mason University and also blogs for theVolokh Conspiracy, argues that a Trump presidency might even be worse for the courts than a Clinton one.
“Trump has a terrible record on cons utional issues,” he said. “He seeks to gut freedom of speech and cons utional property rights, and undermine cons utional constraints on executive power even more than Bush and Obama have.”
“Moreover, over the long term, a Trump victory increases the likelihood that the GOP will become a big-government xenophobic party hostile to civil liberties and opposed to most cons utional constraints on government power ― much like the far-right nationalist parties of Western Europe, whose platforms are very similar to his,” he continued. “Such a party is likely to do far more to undermine the Cons ution than even a Hillary Clinton victory.”
Epstein believes that most of his fellow legal scholars aren’t buying the argument that conservatives must support Trump for fear of Clinton’s potential Supreme Court nominees.
“I am beginning to think that my views are now mainstream among serious defenders of any version of the conservative or classical liberal traditions,” Epstein said.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...on=us_politics
Trump has since released a list of judges that most conservatives like. There's Scalia's seat to fill. Ginsberg is 83, Kennedy is 80 and Breyer is 77 - could be a possible 4 seats to fill - that is much more significant than putting up with one 4 year Presidency term.
I'm just gonna stop debating this. I don't learn anything from this.
This is why our nation is in trouble...literally full of dumbasses. But it's on me for arguing with a high school kid
Severe early onset dementia can be an ugly thing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)