Reply With Quote
I also don't need advance stats to tell me Tony is dog .
One of the clutchest 4th quarters of Finals history, securing a championship this time. In 2013 he thought the rest of the guys wouldn't choke away a double digit lead in the 4th...but they did. In 2014 he made sure that didn't happen, just like he did against the Mavs in G7. Unfortunately, our new "key guys" can't take over an elimination game. Kinda sad, tbh.
Last edited by SASdynasty!; 08-15-2016 at 06:26 PM.
I also don't need advance stats to tell me Tony is dog .
Then stop using BPM.Except I don't evaluate players with garbage minutes to Starters.
All you have to do is ignore him being a top-10 PG in NBA history, one of only a few FMVP PGs, highest scoring PG in playoff history, and winningest player in NBA history with at least 1,000 games played.I also don't need advance stats to tell me Tony is dog .
Who said that was my only tool you stupid . That's where you're wrong.
Top 3 poster in this forum, tbh.Pass first point guards like Stockton, Kidd, and Nash are losing point guards.
Score first point guards are winners. Don't know why they have bad reputations, tbh. I guess it's a vanilla thing to do nowadays.
As for the Tony hate... It's only on Spurstalka place where Manure s come to post ty takes
LOL your blind Parker love is pathetic.
We're not talking about 10 odd years ago, you idiot.
We're talking about the scrub thats been at the PG the past couple of seasons, the washed up version that looks like a deer in headlights and fails miserably when it matters.
Remember how great he was in '13?
I wouldn't call them losers, per se. But their finals records, or lack thereof, tell us we've had the right point guard for our system. Parker has been a scorer when we've needed him to be, a passer when the team's needed him to be one, & the team leader (head of the snake) when that's been needed of him. Sure he hasn't been perfect, but nobody has been.Pass first point guards like Stockton, Kidd, and Nash are losing point guards..
Score first point guards are winners. Don't know why they have bad reputations, tbh. I guess it's a vanilla thing to do nowadays.
As for the Tony hate... It's only on Spurstalk
And Kyrie is entering his prime. Easy distinction to make but you dont make it. Your takes are irrelevant and hateful. Make some ing sense.
Yep, I admit he was decent in 13.
We also lost that, didn't we?
Its irrelevant and hateful if you're a pussy that hates the truth tbh
No need to sugarcoat , we know Kyrie is younger, this isn't about age, its about the CURRENT situation.
Face the ing facts, players don't last forever...
And you Parker defending idiots need to realize its nothing personal, i used to love Parker as a player, but things change...start putting the team ahead of your little man crushes you've been carrying for a decade.
Sometimes you need to let go...
truth nuke
Tony got a max extension after he was and everyone said it was a bad idea.
He was even back then. People almost forget just cause we rang.
Which winning score first pgs you talking about? If you're using Stockton and Kidd as examples for losing pgs i'm going with 90's pgs also and assuming you meant John Paxson, Steve Kerr, Kenny Smith, Sam Cassell then on to the 2000's with Parker, Fisher, Payton, Jason Williams, RONDO, all winning pgs with Rondo probably being the biggest past first pg of them all. But i think it's safe to say that the rest of the pgs won les while not being the best player and mvp on their team during their le run including Rondo but except for maaaaybe Parker in '07.Pass first point guards like Stockton, Kidd, and Nash are losing point guards.
Score first point guards are winners. Don't know why they have bad reputations, tbh. I guess it's a vanilla thing to do nowadays.
As for the Tony hate... It's only on Spurstalk
Like u, I'm glad Kawhi is a Spur. However, in the playoffs (which seems to be the only thing that matters to the krew), he's disappointed when it matters. Sure he helped us win a championship, but he did so as a role player on an all-time great team (2014).Do you think Porker was the reason for any of that? The Big 3 were , and you think Porker was a big reason for that 67 wins possibly 70? That was all ing Kawhi.
Anyway, I hope he steps his game up even more this year. However, this doesn't mean his #s have to increase. It will be better for him (Kawhi) & the team if he stays within a system that better suits the team. A Spurs iso-heavy team will keep having a hard time beating great ball-movement teams. With the players the team has this season, it's better to let the points come from the open man, whomever that may be.
The Spurs are a JUGGERNAUT because of Kawhi. Don't get that twisted.
So many old timers underrating Kawhi, stuck in their big 3 love.
Dude gives so much on both ends of the floor but is somehow expected to win every game on his own according to spurstalk.
Kawhi is who he is because of the system, the coaching, & the culture that was put in place with Duncan, Pop, Tony & Manu.. don't EVER question that.
Are so slow that you didn't read what I quoted? Last time I looked Parker and Irving are both PG's, so they can be compared.
Here you go:Players (Parker, Irving, Anthony, etc.) with offense-only reputations are always divisive, and the score-first point guard is a particularly distrusted basketball archetype, because of how their on-floor inclinations seem to run counter to the nature of the position. In real life, people who hoard things for themselves just seem off. In basketball, the point guard’s primary role is to share.
This is why Irving drives people insane.
Culture of ing your teammates wife? Waiving the white flag? Getting outplayed by your backup?
If that's what it takes to win, then YES!Culture of ing your teammates wife? Waiving the white flag? Getting outplayed by your backup?
These deluded s.
Crofl. Kill yourself ing got. If anything Pop's system is holding Kawhi back.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions