Reply With Quote
Gotta admit.... this is lowkey /thread material.
& LOL @ dis ****-hurt over that
Gotta admit.... this is lowkey /thread material.
But not because of Parker. Manu went coo coo and took Parkers glory from him and then grabbed it for himself the next year. If Manu wouldve just been a normal run of the mill NBA player and KL made one tiny free throw the unbelievable hatred and backstabbing toward Parker wouldnt exist. I take that back its obvious this has nothing to do with Parker and everything to do with needing something to hate.
And Manu is my third favorite player of all time behind Bird and Duncan so this has nothing to do with Manu hatred.
Agreed. Kiwi got benched by TOSB Stephen Jackson
That's funny, considering you're one of the biggest Russell Westbrook haters on this site. He's the epitome of a score-first point guard.
Stockton, Kidd and Nash are losers, but so are chuckers like Marbury, Iverson and LVPorker.
I dunno when unbiased opinion became synonymous with hatred, tbh...
Everybody in here except lefty wants Tony to be great again, or at least have one "rejuvenated" season, IMO.
I loved Tony in 2012 and 2013. We needed him on the floor to compete. The last 3 years have been the exact opposite. What do these s don't get?
Yes, every player should always be in their prime all the time or their gots and deserve to die a slow death for making your lives so miserable. Boo ing hoo
No one is asking him to be in his prime. Can he at least be a neutral impact ing player?
Ummm not that it matters, but people have literally used the word "hate", plus all the silly blame that goes on to individual players, so I'll take it you're trolling.. & yes, I know they're trolling also
& i think real Spurs fans want the TEAM to be great again, irregardless of who gets the individual #s
Last edited by jehawk81; 08-15-2016 at 08:19 PM.
I would have zero problem with Parker if he was a bench player. The coaching staff also has a lot to do with the hams inflated ego.No one is asking him to be in his prime. Can he at least be a neutral impact ing player?
Dunno why you're so focused on a series from 3+ years ago that we lost.
Parker did good yes, cool....no one is disputing any of this and all hate is focused on the past 2 years, especially play off runs...we could also add bits of 14 in there too though, because he was such a minor part of us winning in the scheme of it.
This isn't hate for the sake of it, some of you morons need to take your rose colored glasses off...
This board can be such pussies with the whole "You hate X player so you must be a troll" type garbage.
Some of you just like players past their prime and are too biased and blind to see it.
Not my problem
I like Parker, but not many teams win les when their leading scorer is their point guard. I guess there was Parker in 2007 and Curry two years ago. But 2007 was against mostly weak compe ion and it took the big 3 to beat the Suns in 2007 and Utah was meh and the Cavs were not worthy. And I think the Warriors won a le in spite of Curry. I'm not aware of any other teams that won a le with a scoring point guard.
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Kyrie took the worst shot in playoff finals history and wound up making it. He is arguably the dumbest pg in the league.
What does one even say to things like this?
this tbh. besides kidd in 2011 how often are pass first guards winning anything? rondo doesn't count he was in diapers on that boston team which the big 3 carried. The entire modern history of this league the last 25 years has been aggressive score first guards putting their team on their back like tony and kyrie. they are the winners in june while the pass first guards which white people obsess over like chris paul and nash and rondo all in their primes go home ringless.Pass first point guards like Stockton, Kidd, and Nash are losing point guards.
Score first point guards are winners. Don't know why they have bad reputations, tbh. I guess it's a vanilla thing to do nowadays.
As for the Tony hate... It's only on Spurstalk
Thats cool.
He still ing sucks now and should come off the bench.
He can't even score like that anymore and isn't expected to as Pop knows this, so by your and TGY theory, we need to actually replace him now.
Thanks for confirming, guys.
Cheers
Curry is the only scoring point guard since Magic and Isiah to ring as the first option. And his three-point shooting is a historical outlier. Even then, he's a playoff choke artist who had to be dragged to his only ring by Iguodala and David Lee against a bunch of injury-ravaged teams.
Pass-first point guards are losers, but so are score-first point guards. The bottom line is, in a league where height and length matter more than any other sport, building around a point guard is a bad idea. Any roster whose best player can be neutralized in the playoffs just by having a bigger player guard them is a poorly built roster.
And then there's the real losers like LVPorker and Choke Paul, who have never had first-option talent, don't have a clutch bone in their body, but have the ego of a first option and sabotage their teams because of it.
Other celebs are too busy ing his
You can't say this...when Parker's lack of court vision and passing skills make a 39 years old Manu our best playmaker.
Since he lost his speed he isn't the scorer he was, he isn't a true playmaker, nor a shooter, he can't adapt his game to his declining physical condition.
He can play good early in the regular season but he's aging bad and his game sucks in the playoffs, he can't compete against younger, faster, elite guards anymore.
And just for the record, put Nash along prime-Tim instead of Amar'e, and tell me how many rings that "loser" would have won.
Last edited by YGWHI; 08-15-2016 at 11:11 PM.
^^ as good as LeKing is he isn't ringing if killa kyrie isn't asserting his will in the latter half of the finals outplaying the mulatto brothers. spursfan should know after he did it in 2015 and scored more points in the building than any spur has ever done. you ain't ever gonna see chris paul rondo or john wall doing that in the finals. 10 assist a game doesn't mean anything after the first round when the role players and scrubs you are passing too can't do
before manure intervened MVParker had wrapped up the a ring in 2013 for the spurs. his play in game 1, and clutch shots in 6 had the le before manure and kiwi choked of course. gotta respect the head of the snake
"Minor part" =
2014 Spurs All-Stars: Tony Parker
2014 Spurs All-NBA: Tony Parker
2014 RS Leading Scorer: Tony Parker
2014 RS Leading Assists: Tony Parker
2014 Playoffs Leading Scorer: Tony Parker
2014 Playoffs Leading Assists: Tony Parker
2014 Finals Leading Scorer: Tony Parker
2014 Elimination Game Best Player: Tony Parker
"Minor part" lol.
Please never put Parker in the same conversation as a guy who can't get out of the second round 10 years into his career with a stacked cast and good coach.
Curry is the only scoring point guard since Magic and Isiah to ring as the first option. And his three-point shooting is a historical outlier. Even then, he's a playoff choke artist who had to be dragged to his only ring by Iguodala and David Lee against a bunch of injury-ravaged teams.
Pass-first point guards are losers, but so are score-first point guards. The bottom line is, in a league where height and length matter more than any other sport, building around a point guard is a bad idea. Any roster whose best player can be neutralized in the playoffs just by having a bigger player guard them is a poorly built roster.
And then there's the real losers like LVPorker and Choke Paul, who have never had first-option talent, don't have a clutch bone in their body, but have the ego of a first option and sabotage their teams because of it.
Poor Paker's stans. They can't post any decent stats of his hero in playoffs since 2014.
I wonder if it has something to do with him being a Net negative player in the last two postseasons...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions