Parents who leave their kids in cars?

[.G.]

But do you really think a person who does not have the ability to "remember" their kid in a 9 hour window is going to have the ability to have guilt? These s bags will be back partying and living their ty life to the fullest the following weekend I'm sure.

I think the memory will haunt him forever. I also think it's a reach to think he'll be living it up as if nothing happened. Doesn't appear to have some of those casey Anthony genes in him. He locked up and went into shock mode.

[Thread]

I think the memory will haunt him forever.

G

[UNT Eagles 2016]

Awesome! So there is still a chance that she can destroy her "creation".

No, because I've reached independent personhood and am no longer a drain on her time or finances as required by law.


Admit it, the majority of babies dying in hot cars and such are "neglected" because of money. Most of them were unplanned or "mistakes" in the first place. The parents, such as this guy (who works at Walmart, case in point) do not want to expend their very limited time, money and other valuable resources on a little sucking parasite just because they satisfied their natural urge and desire for pleasure and intimacy, i.e. sexual intercourse.

Why should anyone be forced by big government to pay for such a parasite out of their own money and time? People should have viable options, and termination can be a good practical option, particularly when you consider the lengthy outbound adoption logistics process as well as the future threat of human overpopulation. Termination keeps more money in the pockets of such lower and lower-middle class Americans, and reduces societal need and demand for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid and the like. The option to terminate also encourages people to go to work and aid in bolstering the U.S. economy.

On a nature level, males in particular have never, ever been commanded or forced into working to provide for their young. This is true for most species in the world, and was true for humanity until the cancer of ins utionalization and big government got in the way.

[Blake]

No, because I've reached independent personhood and am no longer a drain on her time or finances as required by law.


Admit it, the majority of babies dying in hot cars and such are "neglected" because of money. Most of them were unplanned or "mistakes" in the first place. The parents, such as this guy (who works at Walmart, case in point) do not want to expend their very limited time, money and other valuable resources on a little sucking parasite just because they satisfied their natural urge and desire for pleasure and intimacy, i.e. sexual intercourse.

Why should anyone be forced by big government to pay for such a parasite out of their own money and time? People should have viable options, and termination can be a good practical option, particularly when you consider the lengthy outbound adoption logistics process as well as the future threat of human overpopulation. Termination keeps more money in the pockets of such lower and lower-middle class Americans, and reduces societal need and demand for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid and the like. The option to terminate also encourages people to go to work and aid in bolstering the U.S. economy.

On a nature level, males in particular have never, ever been commanded or forced into working to provide for their young. This is true for most species in the world, and was true for humanity until the cancer of ins utionalization and big government got in the way.

This has to be a troll post

[UNT Eagles 2016]

This has to be a troll post

Nope, it's just a common-sense, logical, modest proposal.

[I. Hustle]

No, because I've reached independent personhood and am no longer a drain on her time or finances as required by law.


Admit it, the majority of babies dying in hot cars and such are "neglected" because of money. Most of them were unplanned or "mistakes" in the first place. The parents, such as this guy (who works at Walmart, case in point) do not want to expend their very limited time, money and other valuable resources on a little sucking parasite just because they satisfied their natural urge and desire for pleasure and intimacy, i.e. sexual intercourse.

Why should anyone be forced by big government to pay for such a parasite out of their own money and time? People should have viable options, and termination can be a good practical option, particularly when you consider the lengthy outbound adoption logistics process as well as the future threat of human overpopulation. Termination keeps more money in the pockets of such lower and lower-middle class Americans, and reduces societal need and demand for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid and the like. The option to terminate also encourages people to go to work and aid in bolstering the U.S. economy.

On a nature level, males in particular have never, ever been commanded or forced into working to provide for their young. This is true for most species in the world, and was true for humanity until the cancer of ins utionalization and big government got in the way.

Nah, Your dad raw dogged your mom until he splooged all in her. Then she spit you out of her vag. That makes you her property forever. You might not know which guy is really your dad but you know who your mom is. You're her property.

[Blake]

Nope, it's just a common-sense, logical, modest proposal.

Lol logical

You'll need links to back up your lol claim that the majority of babies dying in hot cars are neglected because of money

[lebomb]

No, because I've reached independent personhood and am no longer a drain on her time or finances as required by law.


Admit it, the majority of babies dying in hot cars and such are "neglected" because of money. Most of them were unplanned or "mistakes" in the first place. The parents, such as this guy (who works at Walmart, case in point) do not want to expend their very limited time, money and other valuable resources on a little sucking parasite just because they satisfied their natural urge and desire for pleasure and intimacy, i.e. sexual intercourse.

Why should anyone be forced by big government to pay for such a parasite out of their own money and time? People should have viable options, and termination can be a good practical option, particularly when you consider the lengthy outbound adoption logistics process as well as the future threat of human overpopulation. Termination keeps more money in the pockets of such lower and lower-middle class Americans, and reduces societal need and demand for welfare, food stamps, Medicaid and the like. The option to terminate also encourages people to go to work and aid in bolstering the U.S. economy.

On a nature level, males in particular have never, ever been commanded or forced into working to provide for their young. This is true for most species in the world, and was true for humanity until the cancer of ins utionalization and big government got in the way.

So basically you are telling us that when you have a kid, you will leave his/her ass in the car. NOTED

[I. Hustle]

So basically you are telling us that when you have a kid, you will leave his/her ass in the car. NOTED

LMAO He'd have to get a chick first. He can't even get one to stick around.

[lebomb]

LMAO He'd have to get a chick first. He can't even get one to stick around.

You do have a point....... his hand cant get pregnant.

[I. Hustle]

You do have a point....... his hand cant get pregnant.

LMAO

[UNT Eagles 2016]

So basically you are telling us that when you have a kid, you will leave his/her ass in the car. NOTED

Nope because I'm not going to have any mistake children. I'm actually getting married FIRST unlike the dumb s of today's merica.


Marriage before carriage, always and forever. It's the only way.

[DJR210]

Marriage before carriage, always and forever. It's the only way.

You sound like a woman with goals

[UNT Eagles 2016]

You sound like a woman with goals

I don't envy rabid goon dogs like Antonio Cromartie.

[140]

You sound like a woman with goals